Matter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Matter is commonly defined as the substance of which physical objects are composed. It constitutes the observable Universe. There is a tendency to regard manifestations of energy, such as light and sound, as not being material. However in physics the distinction is difficult to enforce — according to the theory of relativity matter and energy can be converted to one another[1]. Matter is said to have mass and to occupy space, but there are technical problems in physics with both criteria.

In Aristotle's Philosophy, matter constitutes the substratum of all things, which endures through changes form. Other philosophers preferred the atomic theory, which has existed for millennia. For Descartes, matter is principally characterized by extension, ie. the occupancy of space.

Contents

[edit] Technical problems with the common definition

Colloquially and in chemistry, matter is a substance that occupies space, has mass, and is composed of atoms.[2] . Matter is what ponderable objects are made of, and consists of identifiable chemical substances. These are made of atoms, which are made of protons, neutrons, and electrons.

However, one problem with this definition is that it requires matter to occupy space, when according to some models, the fundamental particles are dimensionless points.

Another problem is that it is recognized in the Standard Model of particle physics that kinetic energy and force fields contribute most of the mass of ordinary objects. Ordinary physical objects are mostly composed of fields and kinetic energy by weight, and so exclusion of fields and energy from the term "matter" would require that ordinary physical objects, which is what we point to as examples of "matter", be mostly composed of things we consider examples of "non-matter."

[edit] Fermion definition

In physics, there is no broad consensus as to an exact definition of matter. Physicists generally do not use the word when precision is needed, preferring instead to speak of the more clearly defined concepts of mass, invariant mass, energy, and particles.

A possible definition of matter which at least some physicists use[3] is that matter is everything that is constituted of truly elementary particles called fermions. These fermions are spin-1/2 particles, which are thought to have no substructure. They include the leptons (an example of which is the familiar electron), and also the quarks, including the up and down quarks of which protons and neutrons are made. Since protons, neutrons and electrons combine to form atoms, the bulk substances which are made of atoms are all "made" of fermionic matter.

In this scheme, matter also includes the various high-mass and short-lived baryons (such as delta particles) which are never seen except in physics experiments, and also the mesons. Things which are not matter include light (photons) and the other massless gauge bosons, such as gravitons and gluons. Massive gauge bosons such as the W and Z bosons which mediate the weak force are not included in this definition (i.e., because they are not fermions and have a spin of 1, they would not be considered matter).

[edit] Problems with this definition

The fermion definition of matter is not always satisfying when examined closely. In this scheme, elementary massive gauge bosons of the weak force have mass, but are not considered matter because they are not fermions. Furthermore, only a small fraction of the mass of ordinary nucleons such as protons and neutrons can be accounted for by the mass of their constituent fermions (quarks).

Moreover, any kind of energy in a closed system is associated with an invariant mass which has weight, inertia, and in general acts exactly like all other forms of matter. For example, when an object is heated, according to modern physics, it gains mass. Should heat then be considered matter? Even a system of massless particles can have invariant mass. For instance, any two photons which are not moving parallel to each other constitute a massive system. There may even be massive quasi-stable particles called glueballs which are made entirely of massless, non-fermionic components. See mass in special relativity.

For these reasons, it appears that there is no easy definition of "matter" that correctly takes into account special relativity while still satisfying most people's intuition.

[edit] Usage note regarding matter and anti-matter

There is a semantic difficulty with the word matter, since it has two meanings, one of which includes the other. Matter may mean either:

  1. The opposite of anti-matter (e.g. electrons, but not positrons)
  2. Both matter as defined in the previous line and anti-matter (e.g. both electrons and positrons)

The same difficulty occurs with the word particle.

[edit] Properties of matter

[edit] As individual particles

Quarks combine to form hadrons. Because of the principle of color confinement which occurs in the strong interaction, quarks never exist unbound from other quarks. Among the hadrons are the proton and the neutron. Usually these nuclei are surrounded by a cloud of electrons. A nucleus with as many electrons as protons is thus electrically neutral and is called an atom, otherwise it is an ion.

Leptons do not feel the strong force and so can exist unbound from other particles. On Earth, electrons are generally bound in atoms, but it is easy to free them, a fact which is exploited in the cathode ray tube. Muons may briefly form bound states known as muonic atoms. Neutrinos feel neither the strong nor the electromagnetic interactions. They are never bound to other particles.[3]

[edit] As bulk matter

Homogeneous matter has a definite composition and properties and any amount of it has the same composition and properties. It may be a mixture, such as brass, or elemental, like pure iron. Heterogeneous matter, such as granite, does not have a definite composition.

[edit] Phases

In bulk, matter can exist in several different phases, according to pressure and temperature. A phase is a state of a macroscopic physical system that has relatively uniform chemical composition and/or physical properties (i.e. density, crystal structure, index of refraction, and so forth). These phases include the three familiar ones — solids, liquids, and gases — as well as plasmas, superfluids, supersolids, Bose-Einstein condensates, fermionic condensates, liquid crystals, strange matter and quark-gluon plasmas. There are also the paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases of magnetic materials. As conditions change, matter may change from one phase into another. These phenomena are called phase transitions, and their energetics are studied in the field of thermodynamics.

In small quantities, matter can exhibit properties that are entirely different from those of bulk material and may not be well described by any phase.

Phases are sometimes called states of matter, but this term can lead to confusion with thermodynamic states. For example, two gases maintained at different pressures are in different thermodynamic states, but the same "state of matter".

[edit] Antimatter

In particle physics, antimatter is matter that is composed of the antiparticles of those that constitute normal matter. If a particle and its antiparticle come into contact with each other, the two annihilate; that is, they may both be converted into other particles with equal energy in accordance with Einstein's equation E = mc2. These new particles may be high-energy photons (gamma rays) or other particle–antiparticle pairs. The resulting particles are endowed with an amount of kinetic energy equal to the difference between the rest mass of the products of the annihilation and the rest mass of the original particle-antiparticle pair, which is often quite large.

Antimatter is not found naturally on Earth, except very briefly and in vanishingly small quantities as the result of radioactive decay or cosmic rays. This is because antimatter that came to exist on Earth outside the confines of a suitable physics laboratory would almost instantly meet the ordinary matter that Earth is made of, and be annihilated. Antiparticles and some stable antimatter (such as antihydrogen) can be made in minuscule amounts, but not in enough quantity to do more than test a few of its theoretical properties.

There is considerable speculation both in science and science fiction as to why the observable universe is apparently almost entirely matter, whether other places are almost entirely antimatter instead, and what might be possible if antimatter could be harnessed, but at this time the apparent asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the great unsolved problems in physics. Possible processes by which it came about are explored in more detail under baryogenesis.

It is taken for granted that "observable" matter is "observed" within our three dimensional world of length, width, and depth. Our inability to "see" Dark Matter may be due to our inability to see beyond three dimensions. So Dark Matter is simply matter that exists outside of our three dimensional ability to detect it independently. As an analogy, imagine the perspective of a comic character in the newspaper.He sees only two dimensions- length and width. When you turn the newspaper page, the comic character knows that something is affecting him, but because he can't see that third dimension (you exist beyond the two dimensions he can see), he refers to the force turning the page as "dark matter".

[edit] Dark matter

In cosmology, most models of the early universe and the big bang require the existence of so called dark matter. This matter would have energy and mass, but would not be composed of either elementary fermions (as above) or gauge bosons. As such, it would be composed of particles unknown to present science. Its existence is inferential at this point.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Einstein, A. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies
  2. ^ Merriam Webster's definition of matter http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
  3. ^ a b Povh, Rith, Scholz, Zetche, Particles and Nuclei, 1999, ISBN 3-540-43823-8

[edit] See also