User talk:Masterhomer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives: 1

Contents

[edit] Helping with Version 1.0 listing

Hi, thanks for your reply! Someone from the Judaism project has very kindly added some articles and assessments to the Judaism project table, you are most welcome to add a few more key articles. If you are interested in doing more, then perhaps you could see if others at the project would support using the assessment tags on talk pages? This approach is proving very popular because of the bot-generated tables and log, though among religious projects so far only Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism is using it, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Assessment. Please let me know if I can help. Thanks, Walkerma 06:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Articles like Kibbutz probably belong with a listing for either WikiProject:Israel or an Israeli Regional Notice Board, whichever is the main coordinating body for articles on Israel. As yet we don't have a table set up for these, though we will get there eventually! Thanks, Walkerma 06:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incomplete edit?

Hi, your recent edit in JFJ left the phrase these "indications" dangling out of context. Just FYI. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Userboxes

Hi Masterhomer: FYI, the userbox you use, {{User WP Israel}}, now signifies participation in Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel. I took the liberty to change it to {{User Portal:Israel}}. It was I who made both decisions to name/rename, so I am the one to blame for the confusion. ←Humus sapiens ну? 22:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Collaboration notices

Hi Masterhomer. Collaboration notices should go on the talk pages, not article pages. The expansion tag is for article space. Thanks. --Fang Aili talk 17:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm.. well I notice that some of the collaboration articles do have tags in article space, some don't. And the instructions do say to put the notice on the talk pages. It seems weird to me to put a collaboration notice on an article, but maybe that's just me. At least, we shouldn't have both the collaboration and the expand tags there. Anyways, I won't argue with you about it. :) Good luck on the article. I tried to do a little internet research but there's not much there (about 160 unique G hits). Cheers, Fang Aili talk 17:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Der ewige jude.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Der ewige jude.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fred-Chess 20:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I contacted you because you wrote the PD rationale.