User talk:Markdsgraham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Clifford Orwin

I nominated this article for deletion, and want to clarify that I didn't mean any offence. You're clearly new to Wikipedia; your article was very well written, but I would advise you to read the Wikipedia notability guidelines. Your article doesn't appear to satisfyWP:PROF, the Wiki policy about inclusion of academic figures. Alternatively, if you can provide adequate sources that assert the notability of Professor Orwin, then add them, and leave a comment on the deletion debate. Please don't be discouraged, and don't give up editing Wikipedia just because of this. Walton monarchist89 17:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I have been working on the article; I'd say it is now perfectly good. Charles Matthews 21:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks everyone for the help on my first article.--Markdsgraham 21:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I've withdrawn the AfD, as the article's now adequately sourced and provides evidence of Professor Orwin's contributions - he's more notable than I thought. Excellent first contribution. Walton monarchist89 17:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Clifford Orwin:

Your recent edit to Clifford Orwin (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 21:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harper edit

Thanks. CJCurrie 01:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 04:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)