User:Marco Krohn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Wikipedia news

"We can, do, an[d] should doubt anything we read or hear from any source whatsoever. Especially the information you get from the 6 O'Clock news.

I find Wikipedia surprisingly reliable. If i ever find something that is really off the wall, then i will be *glad*. Then i can go fix it myself - no[t] so the 6 O'Clock news - not so the textbooks for my philosophy courses." -- patty [1]

My thoughts about a review process for Wikipedia:

User:Marco_Krohn/Distributed Review Process

[edit] notes

review is much more than validation (review = syntax, spelling, ..., validation)
is validation possible at all? see - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Article_validation#Trust_metrics (it is thanks to NPOV)
Vergleich mit Linux hinkt - bei Linux gibt es einen streng regulierten Zugriff auf CVS, und insbesondere keine anonymous edits
posting auf de - user hat mehrere Artikel verändert und es wurde nicht bemerkt - http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikide-l/2004-August/019760.html
meta:Article validation
http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/history/results.htm
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000674.html
http://www.frozennorth.org/C2011481421/E652809545/index.html
http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/17/17817/1.html
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2004/07/12/one_great_source____if_you_can_trust_it/

[edit] HTTP

	Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under the GFDL and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.