Talk:Mark Turgeon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Mark Turgeon is part of WikiProject College Basketball, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Before reverting again, please note my edit summary and visit here. The content in the newly cited source does not support the material over which there is controversy. The solution is to cite the material or modify the article to adhere only to the source. There is a considerable amount of material in the article not supported in the lone source. Just address the concerns fully and there will be no problems. CyberAnth 07:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

That doesn't mean you remove everything. You remove what is controversial.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I evaluate dozens and sometimes up to 100 BLPs articles per day. It is the author's burden establish verifiability, not every editor concerned with BLPs that comes along. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence.

But "it seems like something that could be true" must not be sufficient cause to re-introduce questionable material into Wikipedia, and if all that someone has time to do is nuke a bad article, the right response to those who want to restore it, is to restore it fact by fact, piece by piece, making absolutely certain that the quality is right.--Jimbo Wales 07:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Talk:Ron_Jeremy#WP:BLP.

It looks pretty good, now. :-) CyberAnth 08:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)