Talk:Mark Morford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Where does the claim that notes & errata is no longer published come from? Do they mean no longer in the print version? Online copy still exists. -- nae'blis 23:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

It's still printed in the hard-copy editions of the SF Chronicle.

[edit] Iconoclast

Is not the word "iconoclastic" a little too harsh for an article that isn't supposed to be biased? This is supposed to be an article written in a formal, OBJECTIVE tone, and instead, there are negative phrases all over the place. Maybe the writers need to look up "objective", "formal tone" and "iconoclastic" before continuing the article. Look them up quickly, here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absurdliaisons (talk • contribs).

Why not ask Morford? I'm pretty sure he'd agree that he's an iconoclast. In fact, he'd probably be complemented.

Atlant 17:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)