Talk:Marc Storace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Marc Storace was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: 28 November 2006

Marc Storace was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: 13 December 2006

[edit] GA stuff

At the very least, this needs more third party references, a prose check, and the images need to be cut down a bit. It's very difficult to read with the current layout of images. Get some newspaper/magazine sources in there and rearrange the images, and you'll be on your way. Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

• References from interviews added, some images taken out, prose checked. Mutehero^talk 17:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The lead is way way too short. It should summarize the article and be 2-3 paras long. Rlevse 23:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

• Lead Improved. Mutehero^talk 15:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Since I failed this originally, I won't review it again, but I don't think the two extra interviews are really going to cut it on this. Are there really no magazine/newspaper articles that covered this guy? --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• I haven't managed to find any. Lots of interviews, not much else. Article GA nomination put on hold to see if I can find some. Mutehero^talk 19:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I failed it again since problems have not been addressed, and the 7 day time limit on hold has passed. If additional sources can be referenced, please nominate again. --Jayron32 20:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)