User talk:Manu rocks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
नमस्कार! Manu rocks,Wikipedia Embassy from Marathi Wikipedia(आंतरविकि दूतावास) invites you to Marathi Wikipedia!This template shall keep you informed about support and contribution required in various Marathi Wikipedia articles in times to come.
- Marathi Language Wikipedia achives 1000 registered membership mark today!
With registration of userKrishna Londhe, Marathi Language Wikipedia has achived 1000 registered membership mark today!
Thanks to all Wikipedians who have been supporting Marathi Wikipedia through various means like interwiki linking etc.
With warm regards to you all,
Mahitgar 09:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Mahitgar 17:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Dear Mr Manu
Thanks for the note. I must admit that you are correct with regard to the Diwan's tharavaad. It is Edasseri Pattaveettil (not Pattathil) of Mavelikkara.The mistake was caused by a mis-communication on my part. I shall correct this in the article. The Diwan's sister married a certain gentleman (an Unnithan whose name I haven't got hold of yet) whose mother belonged to the Thottaman Unnithan family (which, by the way is my father's Tharavaad) and whose father belonged to Illikkulathu. I have verified this from Dr RR Unnithan (my brother-in-law) who is the grandson of the Diwan's sister and nephew of the Malathi Kunjamma whom you have mentioned. By the way I am related only very distantly to the Diwan (not a relation that merits any mention), but I am directly related to his wife Bhargavi Amma (she was my great-grandmother's brother's daughter). I shall try to gather more info about Illikkulathu. regards.
Hi Diwan Unnithan's brother-in-law was indeed Narayanan Unnithan. He had 3 sons and 4 daughters. They were Padmavati Kunjamma (or Thankamma, mother of Dr RR Unnithan), Krishnan Unnithan (former Addl Director of Agriculture, Govt of Kerala), Sarvamangala kunjamma, Malati kunjamma, Radhakrishnan Unnithan, Parimala kunjamma and Gopalakrishnan Unnithan. All the sons and eldest daughter Padmavati are no more. I'm not sure if his uncle was from Kaduvinal, by Thayvazhi he should have been from Thottaman, unless you meant his paternal uncle. By the way i'm trying to collect names of Unnithan households. Do let me know if you have any with you. regards.
Contents |
[edit] Nambiar
Hello Manu! I see that you have placed a Deletion tag on the Nambiar (Kshatriya) article. The issue was deemed as "No consensus" on the 8th of October 2006. Please explain why you wish to bring up the issue again, and what problems you have with the article. Suggestions are always welcome. Kshatriya Grandmaster
Hello Mannu! I am questioning a point that you have made on discussion pages. I believe that there are Nambiars who are Samantha Kshatriyas and some who are Illathu Nayars, as you say. The Jenmimar Nambiars, as shown in certain records, were extremely wealthy and were 2nd in line to the king. In fact many of these Nambiar women only married wealthy Nambuthris. There are also Nambiars of high rank who wear poonul (these Nambiars occupy an uncertain rank between Nambuthris and Nairs). In fact especially in the Malabar there were Rajahs who belonged to the Nambiar caste (just as there were Nambuthri and Nair Rajahs in certain parts). So to claim that all Nambiars are Illathu Nayars is wrong. Kshatriya Grandmaster 04:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SanjKaimal
I've warned SanjKaimal about the vandalism and will monitor his further edits, obviously since I am not an Indian I can't recognize his attacks. I he continues let me know and if he doesn't stop after that I will report him and he will be blocked from editing. If there is anything else I can do let me know.--Joe Jklin (T C) 10:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- He appears to have stopped. If you notice any other problems let me know, you can go through his edits here and try and fix any other vandalism. Happy editing!--Joe Jklin (T C) 10:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:LakshmiPillaiKochama.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LakshmiPillaiKochama.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:LakshmiPillaiKochamma.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LakshmiPillaiKochamma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Travancore State Manual
Do you know where I may be able to get a copy of it? In English, that is. --vi5in[talk] 21:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
What is the price ? Tintin 01:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Tintin 07:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ambalavasis
Dear Manu, I have noticed that you are deleting the Pushpaka brahmin or ambalavasi links wherever they appear. If you go for a search and research, it would be clear that there was group of castes named Pushpakas and even now there is an organization for these castes. It is Sree Pushpaka Seva Sangham. As far as my knowledge its head quatrers is either at Trivandrum or art Ernakulam. It is not fair to deleting these links without any purpose.
-
- Dear Sir since you didnt leave tht post with an id im replying right here on my page. I m not sure if ull read it but nevertheless...Pushpakas are a special subgroup of the Ambalavasis...only the poonool wearing Ambalavasis were called Pushpakans..and although they wore poonools they are supposed to be degraded Brahmins and hence were never considered Brahmins...Thats y i keep deleting the word Brahmin always...all ambalavasis are not pushpakas.
I saw the page of ur ip address...you are from Thalavur?? This is a personal quetion...is there an old family there called Parasseri or Parasheeril...they are Pillais...kindly do tell me...thanks