Talk:Manu (Hinduism)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Hinduism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
|
| ??? | This article has not been rated yet on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the Mythology WikiProject.
This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
[edit] Flood character?
Ive read that Manu is the flood protagonist of the Hindu culture, and is also the human progenitor of Irani culture, why isnt this mentioned? Here is the connection between Manu with Noah and with Nimrod (Menes). Manu is the word we use to say man or mankind. He can therefore be Adam or he can be Noah beacuse he is the father of all. However, we have a nother Father, a Pope (or Papa) who was named Narmer (Nimrod) and in the year 350 he created the Pharaoh. This is also the year Noah died, which is therefore the incentive to unite the two families pitted against each other when Noah cursed for being defiled in his tent. Narmer named himself Men or Mena or Menes. He therefore was taking a lead to make decisions for kings, the way the Catholic Papa also does. For this reason there is confusion between the Flood year and Noah's death year. It is at Noah's death that Narmer becomes Manu, and yet Noah is recorded by descendents as being Manu at the Flood. So too it is at his death that Noah becomes V-ish-Nu (ascending man Noah) and yet it is at the Flood that Ma-Nu represents the incarnate of Vish-Nu. This is all caused by a spirit named Xisuthros who at Noah's death claimed to be Noah, despite this king dying in the Flood and returning to heaven. The spirit or last king before the Flood is therefore a liar, he is not Noah. The year 2256 of Adam is regarded as Manu's star (Men's star). It is correctly 600 years after the Flood (1656), but again this year 2256 becomes claimed as the Flood. The confusion is whether Venus or Mars as Men's star is Noah's star or Nimrod's star. So we have three years for that star, the year of Flood, the year 350 years after Flood, and the year 600 after Flood which LXX claims is year 936 or 950 after Flood. While many readers wish to know this, i find too many evil egotists who rule Wikepedia and choose for these readers by deleting this. So copies of this will be posted to show that the death of all Egypt occurred because the school priests tried to kill Moses, as you try to kill all that i say too.
[edit] Upper caste bias
The upper caste ppl r continuously changing this page to hide the fact that laws of manu started caste system which promoted slavey to low caste. Their social status was that of insects, i.e. lower than animals.
[edit] Re: Upper caste bias
It is true that many people used Manusmriti to prove that caste discrimination is ordained by god. But the fact that this does not have the blessings of Hinduism is proved through many texts. for example, the following link to a paper clearly demonstrates this. http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=2003&leaf=11&filename=6474&filetype=html
Also, there are many people who say that Manusmriti has been rewritten many times. So, we must try to be balanced in this. When there is dispute about whether Manu wrote what is nowadays considered Manusmriti, then it has no place in this page. Remember that this is a page about Manu and NOT about Manusmriti. We can have separate page on Manusmriti and mention all points concerning it including all the controversies.
Sriksk21 06:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Sriksk21
