Talk:Manhunt 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

That quote on the trailer, "What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time?" is from Shakespeare's 'The Tempest'. Can anyone make any sense of this if its in context?


[edit] Grammar and Console Clarification

I fixed a grammar mistake "games" to "game's", where necessary; and clarified what consoles the original game was released on. It was on PS2, Xbox, and PC. 75.74.203.173 04:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, but what platforms the first game appeared on is not pertinent in the sequel's article. Good catch on the grammar fixes, though. Geoff B 08:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I fixed a spelling mistake, it said Rockstar Vienna was its former "devloper"

[edit] A note on speculating....

Can people please refrain from drawing conclusions about the plot based of a tiny trailer and a letter sent as part of a marketing plan? The letter confirms three things: An asylum apparantly features, there are apparantly two lead characters, and apparantly two doctors are involved. Note how often the word 'apparantly' is used. This is because none of the sources make it clear about any of the stuff that was speculated about in the plot section. Making conclusions that 'mental illness will probably play a large part in the game' based off the letter is completely wrong, and will be removed until such time that it's is actually verifiable that mental illness does indeed play a large part in the game, and the same goes for all the other speculation on plot and gameplay. The Kinslayer 09:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A note on spelling...

Can people please refrain from spelling errors based off of the false assumption that Wikipedia editing equals intelligence? The English language confirms one thing: 'Apparantly' is not how the word is spelled. It's not just a typo, as it was not only typed 4 times, but it was put in quotes. The proper spelling is 'apparently', as another form of the word 'apparent'. Nobody is going to take Wikipedia seriously if established editors would fail a 5th grade spelling test.

Furthermore, note that per my title, an ellipsis has three dots, not four. This, having happened once, can be considered a typo. 75.74.203.173 22:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

So what do you want, a gold star for your spelling ability? The Kinslayer 09:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Please try to assume good faith per Wikipedia standards. As I mentioned before, people will not take Wikipedia seriously when the editors lack basic language ability. Thank you. 75.74.203.173 02:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)