User talk:Malcolma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] New template image: {{Brass-auto-stub}}

Thanks. Looks alot better now! Bjelleklang - talk 22:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the new classicprw image as well! Bjelleklang - talk 13:28, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wolseley list

Sorry about the tone. About the Wolseley list ... I have a photo of a Wolseley car from a local concourse, it came second. It is a 1949 Wolseley 18/85 yet it does not appear on your list. I don't think I am mistaken, and I am no Wolseley expert, I was going to upload it. Also, in the early 1970's I had a 1963 Wolseley 24/80 of which there was a Mark I and Mark II which is not on your list either. Solander 25 November 2005, 13:00 (UTC)

[edit] Anglo-Dane

Thanks so much for what information you could give me. I also noticed the added info to the Anglo-Dane entry. Thanks again. Malnova 04:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A Shot In the Dark - Movies with Minis in them

I saw you added 'A Shot in the Dark' to the list of movies with minis in them - good catch! I'd forgotten about that one. One of the members of my local Mini club read it and said:

 "BTW, did you know the Mini Peter Sellers drove belonged to director Blake 
  Edwards?  The car still exists and was the subject of a feature article
  in MiniWorld (or Mini Magazine?) some years ago.   Apparently driving 
  the Mini in the film was what got Sellers hooked on Minis in his 
  personal life."

Are you sure about the detail you added about the car belonging to Sellers or could your memory be off a bit?

It's possible you are both right - and this guy is thinking of an earlier Pink Panther movie...but I kinda think he's right. I didn't want to RV you because you may have more solid evidence. SteveBaker 03:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm - well the car is a Radford Mini De'Ville...but the story is *way* confusing:

 http://members.aol.com/cotsmm/cots3_7.html

 "Few cars achieved as much fame in the 60's as Peter Sellers
  wicker painted Mini Cooper used in the Pink Panther film
  "A Shot in the Dark". Sellers commissioned this car from
  the Radford company in 1964, specifying every conceivable
  extra and built to a standard usually reserved for Rolls
  Royce motor cars. Sellers used the car as his personal
  transport for a number of years then he sent it to film
  director Blake Edwards as a gift."

OK - so the car was owned by Sellers when the filming was going on - but then given to Edwards later? That doesn't sound like Edwards was the one who hooked Sellers on Minis?

...but then this web site:

http://www.radfordmini.free-online.co.uk/films.htm

 "The film sees Sellers play the bungling Inspector Jacques Clouseau
  and driving A Radford Mini de Ville with wicker-work sides. There
  are quite a few good shots of the car although it seems that three
  differant cars were used all being L.H.D.

  The Radford Mini de Ville that was used for the majority
  of the filming still exists. it was shipped back from America
  in 1994 and now resides in the 'Car of the Stars Museum' Cumbria,
  England."

So now there are three cars? One of which was Seller's personal car with all the extras? Seems kinda unlikely. Urgh! I hate facts! SteveBaker 04:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

To clarify all of the above, I imported this car to the UK from California in 1993 and thoroughly researched it's history at that time before carrying out a restoration to original specification. Peter Sellers had been hooked on coachbuilt Mini conversions a couple of years before the film was shot. He suggested to director Blake Edwards that Clouseau should have one in the film and the production company ordered a left drive French specification Mini Cooper from Radford. This car was used for the majority of the British studio scenes.

A second unit went on location to France to shoot a short sequence, containing a naked Clouseau and Maria (employing doubles), showing the Mini driving from the nudist camp to the traffic jam in Paris, using a similar looking Mini 850 in black with wicker side panels. However, from memory, it did not feature the fog/spot lamps, sunroof or roof aerial which the Radford sported. I believe that this car was one of a special batch ordered by a Paris dealer from BMC. The traffic jam in the Paris square was filmed in the UK and utilised the first car again.

The scenes with dialogue inside the car and filmed through the Mini's windscreen appear to involve the use of a third car, as the just visible rear seat is a totally different pattern to the first car and this could well be Peter's own Radford. Being a right drive car I assume the film was reversed to rectify this anomaly and the occupants' hair styles do seem slightly altered to dilute the mirroring effect.

When shooting finished, the company was quickly wound up and Blake Edwards shipped the first car to Los Angeles and used it for a few months before passing it to director Billy Wilder who, with Blake, was working for the Mirisch Corporation. Over the next three years, various members of the Mirisch family had use of the car before finally being part-exchanged for a Jaguar at Hollywood Sportscars. The new buyer owned it until just before I acquired it. In a letter in my possession, Blake Edwards recalls crossing a street in LA some years later, seeing the Radford and flagging down the driver saying " Hey, that's my car from "Shot in the Dark"!. The owner remembered this occasion too.

As correctly stated the car was bought from me by the "Cars of the Stars" Museum but their website misdescribes the car as being one of Peter Seller's Radfords. Its use in the film was inspired by him and he certainly drove it but it was whisked away to the US as soon as the film was completed.

The film car appears to have been a rush job conversion by Radford as the donor car was finished in Fiesta Yellow and the black repaint covered only the external panels. In the final scene when Herbert Lom is seen planting a bomb under the bonnet (hood), this is apparent as the inner wings are clearly visible in pale yellow. I am sure Peter's cars would have been detailed to a better standard and to a higher specification.

John Adair 21/04/2006

[edit] Morris Minor 1928

Nice to see your article on the 1928 Morris Minor. It looks good. I see from your user page that you're interested in old cars. Do you know anything about Hotchkiss? Adrian Robson 12:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

You're doing well with Hotchkiss! There are some nice pictures of an early car here http://www.dragoneclassics.com/CarPages/1912_hotchkiss_55_h.htm . The engine is marked "Moteur Type AD". Some months ago, I tried to get the owner to allow use of a picture but I don't think I ever got any reply. Adrian Robson 11:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Year linking

Thanks for your courteous message - you are quite right - I had misunderstood the year-linking issue - hope the rest of my edit was OK for you - you're clearly an authority on the subject Ballista 13:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brough Superior

Thank you for your contribution to the Brough Superior wiki. I am glad someone put more detail into the automobile section of this topic.

[edit] License tagging for Image:Chater lea advert.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chater lea advert.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arden

Hi - I noticed that you added the Arden was built in Balsall Heath, Coventry. There is a Balsall Heath in Birmingham, is there another one in Coventry? Aynuk N. Ayli 08:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Triumph 1800 Roadster + British Cars Task Force

Hello,

Browsing recent automotive articles I have come accross your great article on the Triumph, and I thought it would be a very good candidate for being featured in Template:DYK. What is important is that it contains a really nice picture of the vehicle. A small problem is that there is a fair amount of background surrounding the car, so when resized to the tiny 100x100 DYK format, the car gets lost. As this is your photo, I did not want to do any changes to it, but perhaps you might consider uploading a cropped version for the purpose of DYK (if you'd like to keep the original one in the article)?

I would also like to ask whether you would be interested in joining the proposed British Cars Task Force - for details, see WikiProject Automobiles talk page.

Regards,

Bravada, talk - 20:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello again!
Thanks for everything! The new pic (really nice!) has been added to the DYK nomination and I have (hopefully) fixed the TF descriptions. I hope you will find it OK to join now :D
Regards,
Bravada, talk - 10:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 15 August 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Triumph 1800 Roadster, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

[edit] veteran 1900 => 1905

Per the change in various places that veteran includes cars produced until 1905, could you make sure that the autos previously in Category:Brass auto stubs and which were made from 1900-1905 get sorted to {{Veteran-auto-stub}}? (I don't really have an opinion on the matter, it'd just be nice to have things consistent) (I went ahead and made all the text in the other templates and categories consistent, but there's the 181 brass articles to sort through...) --Interiot 10:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks very much! I was actually going to help once I got to my faster internet connection at home, but you've cleared them up already. Thanks. :). --Interiot 12:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ford SAF

Malcolma, thanks a lot for taking care of the Ford SAF article. I will be grateful if you could state what sources you were using when expanding this article. If you speak German, you might also want to take a look at this page - it provides some more information on the commercial vehicle side of the business. Regards, Bravada, talk - 14:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello again and thanks for your work on the Ford SAF article! I have added the reference tags to the Beaulieu tags by default to all paragraphs, as well as done some copyediting stuff. As concerns references, it would be good if you could use Wikipedia:Citation templates - you can find examples in the Talbot Tagora article, which is relatively well-referenced as it underwent scrutinized reviews by "citation specialists" before it got featured. The other part of the trick are the <ref> tags, but I think you won't have problems with using those.
I am bothering you with all that as it is important to mark which parts of the article come from where. Even when you create an article from scratch and only use one source, some other people might later add another things and then if you all just list your sources at the bottom of the page (which would be marvellous anyway, as most people don't even bother), one does not know what information comes from where and therefore it is hard to check the references. I generally mark entire paragraphs when most of the information can be found in the sources I cite or when it would be hard to point to specific bits without corrupting the integrity of the text, and to some specific fragments when just one bit of info comes from another source.
As concerns my edits unrelated to referening, I have altered the style a bit to read more "encyclopedic", and also to make it in line with other articles. I would like to kindly ask you to check for factual accuracy (whether I haven't mixed something up), as well as whether the information contained in the paragraphs can really be found in the book you cited. If not, please strike the bits (use the <s>....</s> tags) that cannot be referenced from the book and we will try to find a source for that. I also still have the German article which gives more perspective on the commercial vehicle side of business - if you read German, you caqn find it here. Thanks again! Bravada, talk - 21:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More Simca stuff

Hi Malcolma! I just wanted to tell you that I have started a section on talk:Simca to discuss and coordinate efforts regarding all Simca-related articles! Do take a look, and also continue to contribute your great stuff to all those articles that need them so desperately. You might also consider helping to procure free pictures for the articles that need them. Thanks! Bravada, talk - 06:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello again! I am writing in the hope of talking you into yet another venture. I know I owe you the German Ford thing, but somehow I can't get away from the Simca fixation. I thought it would be good to improve the Simca article itself, and even found a nice writeup on histomobile.com (see the article's reference section), but I am not that well-versed in pre-war and 40s cars, so I was wondering whether you would consider contributing another great automotive history piece. Backed by your extensive knowledge (and the Bealieu book) you would probably have a better understanding of how it all places in the general automobile history (I can barely tell early Fiat models from each other). I can pick it up from the late 1950s onwards. Thanks for considering that! Bravada, talk - 15:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
PS. I just saw you have created an article on the Lux-Sport! Now I am embarassed not to have started it myself :( I guess I can only make up for that by dropping a few lines myself...
Thanks! By Lux-Sport I meant the car you can find under the PZInz L-S title (quite wrong, actually, as it should be PZInż) - but now I see you have little to do with the article :D I looked at the Rover P3 - I wanted to make a DYK out of it, but I can't find a catchy factoid to build upon :( Anyway, looking forward to your Simca contributions. Bravada, talk - 20:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
PS. Of course there would be a redirect - when moving an article, it is automatically created. It's just that article names in general should refer to some actual beings/entities.

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 31 August 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trojan (automobile), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- Grue 14:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] adding infobox to Maruti 1000

Thanks! what do I do about that table? and can you do the same to Maruti Omni? --hydkat 10:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC) thanks again --hydkat 10:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 346 transmission

Hi Malcoma, I was pleased to find the Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire page on the wiki. The article brought back wonderful memories from when my father ownned two long-wheelbase limousine variants for wedding-car hire. I spent countless hours polishing and valeting them to earn pocket money, so I am familiar with almost every square inch of them, and that's a lot of square inches! The reason that I am contacting you is that I noticed that you made an edit concerning the transmission options of the 346. One of our cars had the "Wilson" pre-select gearbox whereas the other had a 4-speed manual collumn-change gearbox, an option not mentioned in the article. I shall make an edit to that effect, but as my memory is a bit sketchy regarding details, I would be grateful if you could verify my changes.

Many thanks=Red Sunset 19:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


The wording of the paragraph relating to the limousine gave me the impression that the only transmission option available to the limousine was the "Wilson" gearbox. I had noticed the prior mention of a manual gearbox but that didn't seem to apply to the later limousine paragraph. Hope I don't appear to be nit-picking. Please revert the edit if you think best.

Red Sunset 20:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou for your responses. I'm attempting to move them to my talk/discussion page from my user page.=Red Sunset 20:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] users talk pages

Please note that is is usual to leave messages on the talk page rather than the user page.


[edit] Image:LDV Pilot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LDV Pilot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, concerning TVR. I said that he got TVR out of Trevor, by removing 2 vowels (O and E) and one consonant (the first R). You seem to think that this comment is incorrect?

[edit] =)

The Working Man's Barnstar
I, EdGl, hereby award you this barnstar for categorizing countless uncategorized articles. Keep it up! —EdGl 18:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] British motor industry

Hi, thanks for your message! I've often looked at it too, and decided, after coming across a list of UK car plants, to act this time. Yes, good idea to add stats fron the beginning of the industry, I wonder if there is a better way of doing the graphs to make them more compact. The National Statistics source that I used goes back to 1977, but I ran out of patience adding them all! The history could be quite interesting as/if it develops. -- de Facto (talk). 19:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Malcolma, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Malcolma]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk | Contribs 04:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Evil oranges 18:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mini Moke - peer review please

Hi! I recall your help in getting Mini through to WP:FA and wondered if you would have a moment to copyedit Mini Moke. The article is in reasonable technical shape - but I'm not good at polishing the English to the standard needed and I could use a little help! SteveBaker 12:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Categorisation

Hi there Malcolma. We happened to be categorising the article Spyders at the same time. The previously categorised list is nearly done but I expect there's plenty more where those came from. Keep up the good work! Gimboid13 16:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, no problem! Just thought I'd say hi. They're down to the hard ones anyway. Gimboid13 16:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Uncat removed?

What was the purpose of this edit, and what did the summary mean? I ask because I originally tagged the article with {{sources}} and {{cleanup}}, then someone else replaced them with {{new}}, and then you removed that tag as well. Thus, were I not an experienced editor with a huge watchlist and a severe addiction, my two tags on the article would've been removed without anyone doing anything about them. Something seems to be going wrong here somewhere... any idea what it is? -- SCZenz 11:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I guess the fault is with the use of the new tag. Better to have specific cleanup tags. -- SCZenz 21:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] copied collective barnstar

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for participating in the lightning-fast clearing of the backlog of uncategorized articles from October 2006. Pascal.Tesson 17:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Prewarcar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Prewarcar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Liftarn 15:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bond Minicar 1957.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bond Minicar 1957.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Category recreation

Hi there. I see you re-created Category:CSS Attributes and Category:Czechoslovakian motorcycle Grand Prix. I deleted these two categories recently because they were empty for over four days, which is a speedy deletion criteria. I look now and I see that they both are again empty. I hope now that you have re-created these categories you intend to categorize articles in them. If not, you should not have re-created them and they will be re-deleted once they have been empty for another four days. Thanks, VegaDark 02:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

They were not awaiting deletion, if you look in the deletion log I deleted them about 7 hours before you added a category to them. By adding a category you re-created them accidentally. I am guessing the problem was that your browser cache might have recorded them as still existing. VegaDark 20:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for catting

Thanks for categorizing all those Australian Open pages! --dantheox 16:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/a/l/User_talk%7EMalcolma_2863.html"