Talk:Maleficent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There is a horrible amount of spelling errors in the "Kingdom Hearts Series" sub-section of this article. It should be cleaned up. Honestly, how do you misspell "memory"? --Sfida 18:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
This article is too emotional:
"will arguably be treasured by fans for a long time to come" - where's the evidence?
- I've removed the offending statement. --Apostrophe 01:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.167.58.37 (talk • contribs) .
Isn't "maleficent" literally "bad-doing"?
Contents |
[edit] Might want to merge
You might want to merge details from the article to Sleeping Beauty (1959 film), since some of the information that is here is there. -- SNIyer12 (talk), 04:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possible Survival in Kingdom Hearts series
I saw that my edit suggesting her survival has been reverted. Why is it not valid? Maleficent has shown herself to be more competent (if not more powerful) than Pete, and there is no doubt that she survived.198.137.26.152 16:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Maleficent's own biography section
I think we should add a section on Maleficent's life and activities during Sleeping Beauty, because most of her spinoff appearances show what she was doing then, so I think it's fair that her appearance in the film gets it's own section in this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Themeparkfanatic (talk • contribs) .
[edit] when does maelificent turn into a will o the wisp
who removed this from the board, why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.167.58.37 (talk • contribs) .
[edit] What The!?...
Why is Maleficent listed under these categories ( Fictional bats | Fictional porcupines | Fictional bears | Fictional beetles | Fictional mountain lions | Fictional tigers | Fictional wolves)?! I don't even recall her even turning into a bat or a porcupine, or a bear, or a beetle, or a mountain lion, or a tiger, or even a wolf in any media that she has appeared in that i saw/researched (by any media, i mean the sleeping beauty series and the kingdom hearts series). the only animal that she ever transformed into that I recall is the Dragon. so can someone explain why she is listed under these? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.32.238.124 (talk • contribs).
Uh, because some dumbass wants to act like a fucking idiot who deserves to get his throaght slit. I'll change it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.115.34.186 (talk • contribs).
- Whoa, watch it. No personal attacks! Powers T 14:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
ah, no, it happened again. some jerk (possibly the same one who labeled her under the previous false category list.) now labeled her under fictional sharks, fictional cattle, fictional mice and rats, and fictional snakes, and not to mention the return of fictional bats, fictional beetles and fictional wolves. I didn't count fictional crows since it is most likely referring to her pet crow, diablo. But still, who ever is placing her under categories she does not have any relations to would probably be written up! So please stop it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.32.238.124 (talk • contribs). One More Before I Go. Actually, I Think he (or She) meant like that she's a shape shifter, A Cosmic Being. Maleficent is associated with all of them. She's Powerfull, You Guys Are Wrong. All Are.
Um, that why we have it under shapshifting. This person is an asshole who loves to fill people with anger. Really, this person is only annoying people and filling them with rage. They want to act like a fucking scumbag, do it somwhere else ot they'll eventually pay for it. As I said it's some annoying idiot who deserves to get their throught slit and ripped out.
[edit] Main Maleficent Picture
I know it's not a major thing, but could someone with the Sleeping Beauty DVD get a better screenshot of Maleficent and Diablo? The current one is so dark that it's hard to see either of them, and there are many other better shots in the film (such as her first appearance at the beginning) which would make for a more impressive picture. - LainEverliving LainEverloving 05:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)