User talk:Makerowner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Makerowner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Travb (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] AfD on Religious democracy
Hello, Makerowner. Since you're new to Wikipedia, I thought I'd help you out by pointing out some of the resources you may have missed when dealing with your complaints about the page Religious democracy.
1) Don't take the speedy close of your first nomination as a defeat. That wasn't a decision on your nomination, just on its form. Read a few days' worth of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and you can see how the standard form of a deletion nomination works. Each page needs to be nominated separately (people can merge a set of nominations if they feel they're related), and space must be indicated where people can comment on the proposed deletion. It's usually best for your complaints to be kept brief -- excessive arguments on AfD usually are taken as a sign of excessive zeal and inability to maintain a neutral point of view.
If you were trying to re-nominate it, you'll need to create a second nomination. Use the template {{subst:AfDx|second}} or {{subst:AfDx|2nd}} on the page, then re-list as a separate entry as per the instructions on WP:AFD. The first entry will not be revisited, but a second entry will be considered on its own merits.
2) In order to maintain the integrity of the AfD process, AfD discussions are not to be altered after their closure. Therefore, we'll have to delete your latest comment on the AfD. Again, this is NOT a sign of disagreement, just an out-of-process issue. If we let people after AfD discussions, we'd have no accurate historical record.
3) Before trying to delete the page, did you try complaining about the content at Talk:Religious democracy? Quite often articles that have a biased point of view can be improved rather than deleted. In fact, that's the preferred way to deal with unbalanced articles. Indeed, we encourage you to be bold and make the changes you feel are necessary -- but be aware that others can do the same!
4) If you feel you can't get along with others editing the pages you're working on -- especially if you get into an edit war -- there are courts of appeal on Wikipedia. Requests for comment is an opportunity to allow third parties to step in and cool matters down; Requests for arbitration allows you to have a arbitrator manage the disagreement; and in extreme cases, Arbitration Committee acts as a judicial court of final review, empowered to hear evidence and administer penalties. (However, they won't hear cases that haven't been through the lower systems first.)
5) Be sure to keep cool when making your complaints. On Wikipedia, we assume good faith on the part of others until proven otherwise. We believe citizenship is important... but so is making sure the Wikipedia is fair and accurate! So please do continue your fight for accuracy... just use the tools we've worked out after many man-hours of experience to do so.
Good luck! Alba 15:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Dear Makerowner, Would you add some sections about relations of Christianity and democracy as well as Judaism and democracy to the religious democracy article? I read your discussions and made some modifications to main article. Best. Farhoudk 13:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Serial comma userbox
Hey, just a quick note to say that I've changed the location of the serial comma userbox. It is now under User:Twas Now/Userbox/serial_comma:usually
Not a big difference, just complying with a suggested convention and it still shows up on your page.
(You can delete this message after reading it.)
[edit] FYI
Abdolkarim Soroush is a well-known Islamist who calls for "democracy" and believes Iran needs more Islam. He thinks there is insufficient Islam in Iran.
He is against suicide attacks, but [Shiites believe that all Muslims should be ready to sacrifice themselves, and not willing to do so is considered as a sin. The mastermind of this plan was Dr. Abdol Karim Soroush who is today criticizing the Islamic Regime and realizing that his mistakes cost Iranian education a great deal.]
See also Islamic Cultural Revolution. --Patchouli 10:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AAVE
I'm not too familiar with the actual phonemic inventory of AAVE but I'm under the impression that the major difference is the lack of dental fricatives. Does Well have a vowel chart or anything? Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 05:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
There are excellent reasons not to rename the article "Ebonics", and I have just now presented them in the wretched talk page of that messy article. -- Hoary 09:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Mediation (African American Vernacular English)
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/African American Vernacular English, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.Wikidudeman (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for agreeing to mediate.Wikidudeman (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)