Talk:Majesty: The Fantasy Kingdom Sim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Knight chess piece. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.


Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Title change

How about getting rid of the "(computer game)" in the title by moving it to "Majesty: The Fantasy Kingdom Sim"? -- Darklock 02:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

One problem with the proposed rename is that this article also covers Majesty: The Northern Expansion and Majesty Gold. --Muchness 04:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
That has not been a problem for any other similar game article. -- Darklock 20:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
I just created a page for Majesty: The Northern Expansion. Therefore, I see no reason not to change the name of the article. True, there is still the Gold Edition, but Empire Earth and Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest also have a Gold Edition and the articles have been doing alright. Thunderforge 00:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cheat codes

Not sure if the cheat codes are really encyclopaedic, but the game is covered fairly comprehensively here, and the codes are fairly straightforward and certainly a 'part of the game'. Links to strategy, walkthroughs and other more in-depth information are there if people want that sort of thing, but as part of an overview I think the codes should probably be part of the main article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Natronomonas (talkcontribs) 03:53, June 19, 2006.

[edit] Will there be a sequel

I think it was successful enough for one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.174.135.175 (talkcontribs) 09:30, 30 May 2006.

A sequel was planned, but aborted. I don't think the company was doing so well in other areas.
A sequel would go down well with me though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Natronomonas (talkcontribs) 15:18, 30 May 2006.