User talk:MaGioZal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them -

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! -- Meelar 04:36, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Serbs?

Why do you seem not to like them (by making semi-insulting on a nationalist basis edits)? --PaxEquilibrium 15:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

As I said before, I’ve got nothing against Serbs per se (for example, I’ve really got nothing against people like Ljubisav Đokić or Veran Matic), but I am strongly against the radical nationalist-mixed-with-expansionist-and-fundamentalist-religious ideology of people like Seselj, Mladic, Karadzic and the deceased Milosevic and Arkan. I am strongly against ultranationalisms of any kind that put churches of stone or “nations” above the existence of human beings.
I still believe in liberal democracy, secularism and freedom of speech.
This said, what I need to say is that though I have a POV, I don’t want to impose my POV on articles related to the complicated Yugoslav relations, mainly during the troubled XX century, here in Wikipedia; I just want to make articles more balanced, showing the sides, opinions and international positions related to a determined event and to do not muislead readers that can take these articles as reference.
I don’t think that I am not insulting anyone doing the work to make some articles don’t show just one side of a question or trying to spread some kind of “truth”; I think my work is just to make them the most informative and above all scuentific and NPOV as possible.
That’s it.--MaGioZal 03:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I understand. Perhaps I have misjudged You then. Nevertheless, I noticed that despite You tend to go along that way - you have a highly politically inflamated user page (and use double standards for same cases), so I don't really see how could you claim that which you claim in the middle. Also, I would advice You that neutralism and objectivity lies in there. I've met crazy Radicals and nuthead Liberals (here, in Serbia) and I know that they are two extremities that are both bad. For the Liberals (and for a short time, even myself) have pushed and went so hard that they forgot their very own standards, becoming Serbophobes themselves and promoters of non-Serb nationalism. Those are the slow steps that moved the left extreme of Stalin from being a loyal obedient to a the peaceful Workers' world to Earth's greatest modern tyrant and the extreme right of Hitler being an ordinary painter across soldier fighting in a war to the most genocidal thug Gea had ever seen... beware, I advice yah. --PaxEquilibrium 17:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
I don’t think I’m using double standards because personally I don’t believe in the “Kosovo Precedent”.--MaGioZal 14:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
? Why don't You support a united, secular and democratic republic of Serbia, without divisions or segregations of any kind? --PaxEquilibrium 21:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
But I do support an united, secular and democratic Serbia. I just don’t think that Kosovo belongs to it anymore.--MaGioZal 18:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nice...!

I admire your goals of seeking a united BiH. We all hope that will happen someday. The sooner the better? A Bosnia where anyone can live freely, but supports their own government! Thanks, Vseferović 04:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  ?

But that's not a united secular without any divisions or segregations country. :) Just democratic. :D (whereas You support that for Bosnia and Georgia). Isn't that self-contradicting a bit?

No, it isn’t. I just didn’t add “united and secular” because I thought it would be over-citing, but now I corrected it.--MaGioZal 07:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Also, what's Your opinion on Cyprus? --PaxEquilibrium 19:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

First of all, I think no definite decision on Cyprus could be made before the Turkish troops go.--MaGioZal 07:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I just found out that Turkey (aside from Russia) heavily opposes independence of Kosovo... which is where lies the greatest irony.--PaxEquilibrium 19:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
There’s no irony on Russia and Turkey opposing Kosovo independence: they got Chechnya and Kurdistan, respectivelly.--MaGioZal 07:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, there is - it's historically expecting to see Russia fighting against independence and Turkey for. --PaxEquilibrium 13:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, but things don’t always work according to the Huntington definition.--MaGioZal 15:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Anyway, I'm not pushing You to answer me - but Your silence says more than words do... --PaxEquilibrium 19:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
And the only thing that I can say on this matter is that personally I have the same opinion of the leadership of European Union, the United States and many other Western World major institutions: the Kosovo case does not set a universal precedent of resolution of other separatist conflicts, because each conflict is specific in their caracteristics and resolutions.--MaGioZal 07:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I mostly agree with You - but You still don't have to keep Your user page politically inflated by those arguments, like You're an expert on them. :D Anyways, please tell me Your opinion of the solution of the Turkish Republic of North Cyprus issue (I think You should go that way as well). I'll be gladly waiting Your answer. Cheers, --PaxEquilibrium 13:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, I think I don’t have to be a “specialist” to got the right to express my opinions. And I would just take down my userboxes under a request from an Administator and/or when similar userboxes advocating the reverse of the ideas I defend will be taken down, too.--MaGioZal 15:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
There is a very large difference between excessing the rights of having opinions, fredom of speech etc... and playing God. --PaxEquilibrium 22:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bosniakophobia

It is interesting how Serbs promoted invented word "Serbophobia" on the internet. First they introduced the word to wikipedia, and then thousands of other scrapper sites copied content from wikipedia, and now Google yields thousands of matches for this invented word. Of course, while Bosniaks wanted to do the same, and create an article Bosniakophobia, Serbs quickly jumped and voted "NO!". It is sickening to see Serbian propaganda and lies poisoning Wikipedia. Bosniak 06:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image of your Samsung SyncMaster display

Hi, I've changed your image TFT_LCD_display_Samsung_SyncMaster_510N.jpg as was suggested by user:KittenKiller on the TFT LCD talk page. Hope you don't mind. --ReconTanto 14:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Year, New Talk Page

Hi,

Today I made a cleanup of my talk page since it was becoming too long and many of the topics were clearly outdated. I’ve deleted everything but the first welcome message from Meelar and the topics from December 2006 (these topics will be deleted too, but in February; the exception will be the ones that went on through this year).

But nothing is lost: if you want to check the past topics, just browse through the last 2005 and 2006 versions of this page; and if you want to make any new comment about them, just write a new section here, OK?

That’s it. Best regards,


-- MaGioZal 01:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "pro-Serb-nationalist editors"

Please stop with the ad hominem attacks, frankly, it's sad that this is all you can resort to. [1] Thanks. // Laughing Man 21:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

My opinions and questionings aren’t related to people, but the ideas they defend (and their ways to do so).--MaGioZal 21:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Yugoslav wars

I've begun work on Template:Yugoslav wars. It's a work in progress, but feel free to add anything I've overlooked/haven't got round to yet.--Hadžija 18:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)--

[edit] OK

You are very deeply emotionally involved (evidently) with this pan-Serb deal for an American. You cannot deny that. I'm just asking you why ('cause you're one of the prime suspects on my sock-list for potential sock-puppets). --PaxEquilibrium 15:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Man, I just edit articles here in Wikipedia using this ID. I have a fixed IP from my ISp, and I don’t do any king of sock-puppetry.--MaGioZal
Hello Brazil, PaxE also thinks I am one of your sockpuppets. and he apparently haas 'evidence' to back this up according to this message he left me. Well, clearly interpol won't be lookig to recruit him in a hurry.
There's no problem if you're User:MaGioZal (and I have to say that everything indicates at that direction). You did nothing wrong. :) --PaxEquilibrium 12:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Love from Buffa ( your twin!!) Buffadren 14:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

MaGioZal, I just saw that Buffarden had an IDENTICAL userpage to yours, IDENTICAL interests and IDENTICAL aims.

Plus, he did one of the oddest things in the world. He replied to my talk page in perfect English, and then rewrote the whole thing to "pig" English. And later, fixed some of the bad wording [after I asked him if he's You].

Tell me honestly, wouldn't You go for the very same conclusion? Isn't my suggestion rational (even considering you're not the same person)? --PaxEquilibrium 19:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
PaxEquilibrium, I just have one thing to say: I am not Buffadren. As I said before, I just use this username to make edits and comments in articles, and there’s no reason to me to create an “alias” or sockpuppet to say what I’ve already said. I think anything should be cleared if the IP numbers were compared — and, as a tech-savy bright, usually I don’t have interest in typewriters or Christian music…-- MaGioZal 23:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
yeah, you already said that. :)
I'm just asking you wouldn't you in my place suspect the same thing? --PaxEquilibrium 09:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Paul, I offered you an IP check before. I did not want to do this as it immediately indentifies the organization at where I work... Also my English is nearly perfect I never wrote PIG English, English is the spoken language in my career place even though few here are native. I do not have IDENTICAL interests as MaGioZal. we live in opposite corners of the world and our edits are in complete opposite timezones.....we edit different pages.....Buffa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Buffadren (talk • contribs) 17:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Reasons

I suppose none of the examples I presented to You you recognize? --PaxEquilibrium 21:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I've studied around Abkhazia, and in most cases I agree with You - but as far as I've read about South Ossetia (at least here on Wiki), it's totally different. --PaxEquilibrium 23:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
There is much more similarity between South Ossetia and Kosovo (Ossetians were a vast majority before the war too, unlike the Abkhaz issue). I'm getting a feeling You grouped the two only because of Russian support and only that. (What happened with old NATO's every single separatist movement is unique)? :D --PaxEquilibrium 00:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia

Pointer: MaGioZal, please carefully read the following: WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:DICK and most especially WP:NOT (and WP:POINT).

All cheers (don't be mad, I'm only trying to help You out)!!! --PaxEquilibrium 15:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/a/g/User_talk%7EMaGioZal_0bbd.html"