Talk:Magic satchel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Kirby Super Star Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

I am unsure why the Wiki link to TARDIS is provided at the bottom when there is no mention of the TARDIS within the article. It does follow a related concept, but I think of a true magic satchel as an object that can be used to hold other items, not a spaceship in which the users can walk around. I think it should either be removed or some more rationale given to explain similarities and/or differences. I also don't see any major problems with cleanup. Perhaps the copy edit tag can be removed? ElinneaG 17:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Well, along with the other 'See also' articles, it's a theme not of holding things, but of extradimensional objects: The Bag of Holding, the Portable Hole, the TARDIS, and Hammerspace itself. SAMAS 00:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Examples section

The Examples section should either be significantly trimmed to a small list or moved to another articled titled, for example, "List of examples of the magic satchel". As it is, the section is excessive and makes the article tedious. Rintrah 15:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)