User talk:Madndndrumr711

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Ashwin Betrabet

  • Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages — it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. JuJube 06:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hari Ananth

  • Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices and comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JuJube 06:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Please stop removing maintenance notices from articles when the required changes have not been made. If you continue to disrupt maintenance processes you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JuJube 06:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:JuJube

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a user's page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JuJube 06:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I think this edit, which postdates the "last warning", counts, but since I was the intended "victim", I might be seen as biased if it was me who gave this bloke a little vacation. It's an interesting edit, an admission (not surprisingly, IN FULL CAPITALS), that he's having "fun" which I am interrupting. -- Hoary 06:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Minutes later, you made another silly edit. I'm therefore giving you a little break from Wikipedia. -- Hoary 07:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Jaworski

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Paul Jaworski, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Wittyname 06:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by removing maintenance and AfD tags and tagging userpages for speedy deletion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Please collaborate constructively with others so we can write a great encyclopedia. Thank you. Kusma (討論) 07:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

You beat me to it by mere seconds, Kusma. -- Hoary 07:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "The claims that my edits to Ashwin Betrabet, Hari Ananth, and Paul Jaworski are unjustified and offer no proof."

Decline reason: "(i) I cannot parse the request. (ii) Blocked user doesn't start to express any desire to make any worthwhile edit to any worthwhile article. (iii) I can't parse the user's edit summary, "unblock me motherfucker": this could mean (a) "unblock my motherfucker" [whoever that might be], "unblock me, [who am a] motherfucker", or "unblock me, [you] motherfucker". I fear it's the third, which is an odd way to describe a contrite statement of good intentions."

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.


I am sorry if I wasn't clear. I was actually referring to myself. I have been widely known to fuck many people's mothers. Also, I would like to be unblocked so I may begin to constructively edit wikipedia pages. Again, I am sorry for any confusion.

By the way, your second interpretation is incorrect. It would be "unblock me, [who is a] motherfucker, not am. It does not make sense to say "who am" without an "I".

Also, I would like to add that by stating that my article is not "worthwhile," you are being biased. If a judge cannot be biased in court, a Wikipedia administrator should not use biased judgement when blocking a user.

  • And a Wikipedia editor should abide by policy instead of just saying "These people exist because I say they do and that should be good enough for you". JuJube 11:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/a/d/User_talk%7EMadndndrumr711_f993.html"