From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 26/5/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
More information about this article...
|
|
Creation by a banned user is not in and of itself reason to delete. This content seems valuable (although it needs sourcing perhaps). Put it up for AfD if need be but don't speedy it. IMHO anyway. ++Lar: t/c 04:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the only contributors to this article are Benzee and Prince_06 - who are both proven puppets of Prin. So he is unavailable to cite references or answer questions regarding this article. As to the article itself, this film is just a masala entertainer. It is not a classic to enter encyclopaedias. Anwar 04:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know what are the notability guidelines for movies, but the plot has been copied from [1]. - Mike Rosoft 09:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- That's a copyvio and reason to remove that part, (which I have done) but not the whole article. As for Anwar's first objection, I've addressed it at Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions#Thirupathi as it appears that someone may have taken this article under their wing. It wasn't my intent per se to do that but removing copyvio counts. I have no problem whatever in putting this up for AfD but I think insisting it's a speedy on what is ultimately a bureacratic point may not be the best approach. The speedy has been contested, validly or not, so AfD it. If it can't survive AfD no harm done, but if it does, typicailly it will be a better article at the end of it all. Putting it through AfD will address his second objection of non notability. ++Lar: t/c 15:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
