User talk:Luzzifer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image tagging for Image:0271.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:0271.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Beograd202.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Beograd202.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blanking Belgrade history
Please do *NOT* arbitrarily delete large sections without prior consensus! If you feel History should be removed from Belgrade article, discuss it first on Belgrade talk page. Thank you. Shinhan 05:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've just moved it to paragraph 8. It's better so.
--Luzzifer 00:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Ah sorry I didnt notice it was moved >_< Shinhan 07:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:SvSava.default-318x345.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SvSava.default-318x345.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lucid statements
"Old Belgrade is situated in South-Eastern Europe, with one part on the Balkan Peninsula". Please stop vandalising the article. Balkan peninsula and Southeastern Europe are synonyms so this sentance does not bear any rational meaning. Vojvodina indeed belongs to Central Europe and so does Zemun and even New Belgrade, the latter however only geographically. To check out the borders of the Balkans see Central Europe, Balkan peninsula etc. Balkan peninsula reaches Sava and Danube which is where it merges into Central Europe. User:NeroN_BG.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Avala_07.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Avala_07.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] link to Bosnia
Hello, when you want to link to the article about Bosnia, please do not link to Bosnia, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as Bosnia (region) or Bosnia and Herzegovina by writing out [[Bosnia and Herzegovina|Bosnia]]. Regards, Jeff3000 00:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
yes i returned to Serbian page and your information means nothing. I have many dictionaries. some old, some new. If you read what I said, I was clarrifying that our language is not tonal in a sence, it is in part tonal, but only as much as Swedish. Most of those words have one meaning, so they cannot change when you say them different. That was my point! Prove they do and we'll talk, extra, where there is variation, it is easy enough from sentence to see what is meant, and even then, the words are cognates, or derivatives. Not like "Biti" means "to be" one way, and then "rabbit's testicles" on another pronouncement. Chinese is like that, Swedish and Serbian are not. The tones are recomended and not everyone adheres, not even people from Vojvodina and Sumadija, I lived in Kragujevac long enough to know. Jordovan 14:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)