User talk:Luna Santin/Archive 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User	Talk	Contribs	My Sandbox	Improve Me!

			This is my talk archive. I periodically move conversations here, to reduce clutter on my main talk page. If you'd like to continue or reference a conversation that's been archived, feel free to copy it into my talk or link to it, but please don't otherwise edit or remove it from this archive. Please don't leave messages for me, here, I can't guarantee I'll read them in a timely manner. Instead, use my main talk page. Thank you.
Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23 1 « 14 ‹ Archive 15 › 16 » 23

Happy Hanukkah

Happy Hanukkah Luna Santin I know you're not Jewish but I am so I feal like spreading the Hanukkah feeling. Thanks for getting me unblocked.Sam ov the blue sand 23:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Price is Right redirects

Why did you delete two Price is Right redirects? The admin closing the RfD concerning those two closed it as a "keep". Philwelch 23:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Untitled section

So what am i supposed to do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SmokeyPirate (talk • contribs) 16 December 2006.

Thanks.

Hey, thanks for reverting the removals from my talk page archive. Looks like one of the parties didn't want a record of the dispute around. --Maxamegalon2000 16:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

AOL Netblocks

As requested here are the AOL netblocks: 62.51.0.0/16 64.236.0.0/16 66.185.128.0/19 149.174.0.0/16 152.163.0.0/16 172.128.0.0/10 172.192.0.0/12 172.208.0.0/14 172.212.0.0/16 172.213.0.0/16 172.214.0.0/16 172.215.0.0/16 172.216.0.0/16 195.93.0.0/17 198.81.0.0/19 204.29.186.0/23 204.140.8.0/22 204.235.112.0/24 204.235.113.0/24 204.235.114.0/24 204.235.116.0/24 204.235.117.0/24 204.235.119.0/24 204.235.120.0/24 204.235.121.0/24 205.188.0.0/16 206.222.224.0/19 207.200.96.0/22 207.200.112.0/20 207.200.112.0/20 217.137.0.0/17 217.137.132.0/22 217.137.136.0/21 211.137.144.0/20 211.137.160.0/19 211.137.196.0/22 211.137.200.0/21 211.137.208.0/20 211.137.224.0/20 211.137.224.0/20 211.137.240.0/21 211.137.248.0/22 211.137.252.0/24 211.137.253.0/24 211.137.254.0/24

Good Luck, Somitho 23:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

unblock-en-l

Please email Essjay using the Special:Emailuser to discuss moderation of this mailing list. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 01:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Uncivil behaviour

Hi! Sorry, to bother you. Could you have a quick look at my talk page and Talk:Wigan. Some of the comments have been fairly un civil at the least, but I would be interested to know if you think if they are personal attacks. Certainly I've got myself dragged into an edit war that is proving very boring. Thanks in advance for any advice. Regan123 04:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for that speedy =) — Deon555^talk_desk 08:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleted page?

Greetings, you recently posted a message on my talk page about a article I created was deleted, I know of no such thing since the last time a created one was 3 weeks ago. Thanks Sloveniaiscool 16:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Third opinion

Do not remove entries from WP:3O without cause. Entries do not have to fit your definition of "neutral." I have it on my watchlist, so do not try again. KazakhPol 19:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Funny, I see nothing there to justify your removing a valid entry. KazakhPol 19:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I have moved your comment on Pco's talkpage to a new section, as I believe we are discussing separate topics at the moment. Your comment is under the section "untitled." On a separate note, there is an ongoing conversation on Wikipedia talk:Third opinion you may be interested in, KazakhPol 20:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, whats up with removing my request? You must be a friend of Jayjg. Pco 20:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Luna's actions in this matter. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 22:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Lin

You know what I'll keep in mind? You need to fuck off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rasburried (talk • contribs) 17 December 2006.

where did "cold fusion/tmp" go ?

You seem to have deleted cold fusion/tmp on Sept 18, 2006. This temporary page was written by a cold fusion researcher, and, as such, contained valuable information. I wanted to have a second look at it to improve the cold fusion article. Why was it deleted ? Was the deletion discussed and approved somewhere ? Is there anyway to find it again ? It would be sad if we could not find it anymore. Pcarbonn 22:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for undeleting it. Where exactly did you put it ? I can't find it. Pcarbonn 17:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeagley article

Hi, you've been following the recent controversy at David A. Yeagley? Multiple IPs (most likely sockpuppets) keep deleting the entire article, replacing it with a strongly negative/POV "hatchet job" article. I realize that this individual is political and thus leaves his writings open to scrutiny and commentary, but the continued reversion without collaboration or use of the discussion page (it's been several weeks) is a bit difficult to deal with. Nobody has responded to the posting I made to the biographies noticeboard so I wonder how I should proceed, other than keep reverting the article for an indefinite duration into the future. I suppose the IPs could be considered to be committing repeated vandalism, but your input would be appreciated. Badagnani 04:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks. Badagnani 09:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 51	18 December 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: Holiday publication
Elections conclude, arbitrators to be chosen	Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser opens
WikiWorld comic: "Dr. Seuss"	News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

You have new blinkennbox.

Does it work? [ælfəks] 06:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Is this User blocked?

I am not sure. Can you please check up on it and put a template which notes the blockage? Thanks. Bearly541 10:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I forgot about the log. I don't have access to it, since I am not an administrator. Bearly541 10:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

1-5-7-1

Were you going to put this on AfD? I've created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-5-7-1 and added my arguments for deletion there. I like a lot of the telephony articles on Wikipedia; they were one of the reasons I came here. However I don't think we need an article on what appears to be little more than a voicemail service. Graham87 11:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Can We Block This User?

This User: 210.5.121.190. You removed vandalism from the Prussian Blue (duo) Talk Page that that User left before. The User left this vile, threatening vandalism before; and I believe they should be blocked for it. By the content of the vandalism, I consider this User to be dangerous. Acalamari 16:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for blocking them. Most vandalism is annoying, but the type of vandalism that the User far, far beyond "normal" vandalism. I gave this User a warning when they first left the threat, but it seems that the User wrote the threat again. We'll see if the vandal keeps doing it after the block. Again, thanks. Acalamari 21:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Church of Google

I would like to inquire about recent deletion of "Church Of Google" article. The reason given was quite criptic, and I`d like an explanation, please. Alice Shade 22:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Church Of Google

Article was placed in Wikipedia according to "Search engine criteria". At the current time, requesting search for "church google" or "church of google" will yield several top-rank search results, which are either highly relevant, either directly connected with subject at hand. (tested at www.google.com and www.yahoo.com)

It was designed primarily not as a reference to particular organisation, but as a summary of religion/philosophy, geared to provide relevant information and refute several common misconceptions. Subject was referenced several times, both by internet resources and press - it could be seen in the search results, which back up earlier claim.

As an example of relevant press - http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/29/nyt.friedman/

This article was printed in New York Times, and references to subject as religion/philosophy.

As a side note, article represented a work in progress, and the state it was deleted in, could be described as stub - expansion of it was planned to follow through, along with wikification and compilation of references. It is a joint project, thus it`s compilation was stretched to accomodate contributors from different time zones. Alice Shade

Sneaky vandalism

Dhxaluzabm77 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) just showed up on recent changes, same MO as the others you blocked. Choess 03:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll hang on RC for a while yet, drop any others I see onto AIV for someone else to handle. Choess 03:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Re:Church Of Google

Well, if it comes to that...

http://www.pandia.com/sw-2004/16-god.html

http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20040504GoogleFindsReligion.html

Those articles date back to 2004 (another two of top searches for "church of google"), and reference solely to idea of religion/philosophy. They have no connection whatsoever with www.thechurchofgoogle.org - which was founded at summer of 2006. Moreso, those articles reference an Orkut society, which is quite a different medium, then web site.

I think, that this provides enough of proof to state, that the idea of such religion/philosophy is not a singular joke occurance, and had been voiced and researched in several different cases and sociums, which, in my opinion, would be reason enough to provide an outline in Wikipedia.

Alice Shade 11:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Luna!

Oops, indeed! That'll teach me for making sneaky edits while at work. Thanks for letting me know. :) Sarah Ewart 12:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Church_of_Google on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Church_of_Google. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Alice Shade 16:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for unblocking me, it made my day! I'm thankful there are people on the Wikipedia that are willing to be reasonable. Happy Holidays too. Tblore 18:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

How is an Admin De-Syopsed?

Luna, what is the process of an admin being de-syopsed? Don't worry, I am not talking about you. Bearly541 20:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, because this admin was rude to me on this incident [1]. He has been stalking me since a prior incident. Bearly541 21:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Kalpesh on Wikipedia Again

Hello Root_Exploit, Thanx for your co-operation in being big discussion on Ankit Fadia Talk Page. I have answered your queries on. Please Check :

[2] http://kalpeshsharma.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/wikipedia-administrators-ankit-fadias-relatives/#comments

Thnaks a lot ! Kalpesh Sharma —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.201.77 (talk) 20 December 2006

Er, sorry, but I'm not sure what you're referring to? If we've had some communication in the past, I may need you to jog my memory. Luna Santin 21:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

why am i blocked?

why did you block "wikimaster,beter than you"??????????????????????????????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.41.12.21 (talk) 20 December 2006

mak82hyd

Thanks for ur help, I will make sure I keep calm and talk sense. regards. Mak82hyd 00:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I will, Thanks very much for ur warm advise and help. regards, Mak82hyd 00:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Recent Changes

Did you notice on RC that there are (-152) and (+155) on the changes? What do they mean? Bearly541 00:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The numbers mean how many characters are being added or removed. A character is each letter/number/symbol - for example, cat has three. (+572) means 572 characters were added to the article, whilst (-176) means 176 were removed. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 10:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Selena Protection

Luna, can you please protect Selena since she is a FA? Vandalism is currently occuring there. Bearly541 00:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays, Luna Santin! Wishing you a very happy holidays, full of laughter and good times! Hope you have an awesome beginning to 2007 as well! Best regards! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 01:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Failure

please don't change the failure passage back to the normal one. im trying to do this funny thing for my math teacher and when you change it it messes everything up —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

how do you do that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

i got it nevermind. thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

Wobble

I cant stand this user and the crap hes posting on here. I cant allow such anti-diversity, anti-racial, anti-ethnic things tobe posted on Wikipedia because even thoug hhe thinks hes doing something good, all it does is feed far-right, fascist, racists opionons who fear of losing their distinct identities, cultures and other features. Im sorry, but people like Wobble are a waste of air. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.107.88 (talk) 21 December 2006

Ok, I will try to make an official complaint about him with the measures you suggested. I like Wikipedia, and I only wish for it to have the most valid, factual, correct information and sources as well as trying to better human society rather than negatively and faslely altering or affecting peoples perceptions of the truth. 69.157.107.88 11:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

This user has a history of making personal attacks and has specifically targeted me for some reason. He has been blocked in the past for this sort of behaviour.[3] I don't know what his problem is, but he never participates in discussions on talk pages, and seems to think that all of the changes he doesn't like are somehow down to me (when often the changes were nothing to do with me). Often when changes are made they are the result of a discussion on the talk page. Alun 12:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• And you Wobbs have been consistently warned and near-blocked for vandalism and POV pushing. Read what I said above and that is my problem with you. Some of your opinions are dangerous and unwanted and I'll do everything I can on Wikipedia to stop someone from you pushing such an agenda. Your views insult aspects of peoples identity and distinctivess that they value, and such views need to be stopped. 69.157.107.88 12:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Personal_attack_intervention_noticeboard#Does_possible_dispute_invalidates_PAIN_report.3F

Replied there.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  20:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

thank you

thank you for that however i would still like to see some type of news or something posted in the athletic section. Because currently what is there tells me nothing. If I am new and I look at the athletic section all i can say is ok they have sports there. Please tell me a way to get something on there that is interesting and will let others look at a page that has some character about it.71.76.199.201 23:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Bill Rane

Your decision to eliminate the article "Bill Rane" based on lack of notability is in error. You should check this in greater detail. While Bill Rane is not known extensively in some places, he is, in the opinion of many, the most notable artist to come out of Art Colony Taos, NM in the entire last half of the twentieth century. You need to google "Bill Rane" and go through the many articles in the Taos newspapers to really understand just how important he is to the Taos Art Colony. This is a mistake that hurts wikipedia, and does not help it. Wikipedia is the appropriate place for speicialized knowledge. Just because you are not personally familiar with Bill Rane does not justify your deletion on notability grounds. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.35.122.142 (talk) 07:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

Hey, there. I have no objection to a review of my actions -- if what you say is true, then it's possible I've acted in error. A discussion has been started at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Rane so that the community can have more input and develop a consensus as to what should be done. If you haven't already, you may wish to read about our deletion policy, about the AfD process in particular, and perhaps how to use a discussion page, so that you can have your say in the discussion. I highly encourage you to direct your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Rane. Thanks for your time. Luna Santin 09:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

IRC-motivated blocks

Does this statement mean that you approve IRC-motivated blocks? It is not the first time that I face this problem and I think it legitimate to investigate what's going on there. If you find some hidden political agenda underneath it all, you are welcome to share your apprehensions. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 10:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Moved from User:Luna Santin

Hey, would you rather me put "Texan Tyrant" or "The GoatseMan" there? I could have easily done the latter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AaronFX (talk • contribs) 22 December 2006.

hi luna

hi luna, sorry for the edit reverts without explanation . kindly go to the page. the discussion wsa put up two months back and the editors had agreed to test out the changes. a new page called "iipm controversy" has been active since almost a year back but strangely the "iipm" page completely repeats text from that page into this page. after a lot of discussion, the reverts were made . unfortunately the people who are reverting back wish to keep text in two places, which is not acceptable. but we'll work towards a concensus. thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.65.248.234 (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

Checkuser

Thanks... I left the code blank because I didn't see one for "User swears he's not a sockpuppet and I'm inclined to believe him based on circumstantial evidence so I thought I'd be nice and request a checkuer since he is on indef block and his request for unblock was denined". Maybe that should be G?  :) --Isotope23 16:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Civility

Please, be respectful and civil when you come to my page - I do not expect you say me Hey. I was never involved in Battle of Konotop. When is illuminated complete country - that is blanking vandalism.--Vladyslav Savelo 19:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

PERSONALLY ATTACKED!

I was PERSONALLY ATTACKED by the below user on my user page; here;s what he wrote: The main Dune page is already long, this and other articles were purposely split off the main one. In the case of Dune planets, many minor Dune planet links redirect here, if you checked the "What links here". Why is List of One Life to Live characters deserving of its own article and this one isn't? Because you're crazy. TAnthony 01:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

He should be reprimanded! Yrgh 01:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)yrgh

Is anything being done about that user!?

Killercop.com

Luna, hi, I was trying to delete the page regarding killercop.com and you blocked my IP (wheresericat). I created the page and decided to delete it. I was not vandalizing it. Any questions email me at wheresericat AT gmail DOT com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.127.246.120 (talk) 23 December 2006

Merry Christmas

December 24th message of the day: "Luna, you got this page in Simple English? Also, I redirected your name, because it gets confusing for me! Bearly541 14:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

vandalism

Thanks for fixing my user page. First time it's been vandalised, and it's not a nice feeling. I see that the perpetrator was warned earlier yesterday. Tony 15:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Thejax

Hey, there! Wondering if you had any thoughts or comment regarding this user's current unblock request -- they seem to be claiming that they left their account open, and someone was abusing it. They do seem to have a prior edit history, at least. Any thoughts? Luna Santin 10:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Luna!

Thanks for your note. I have declined to unblock this user; from the very beginning his edits were vandalistic or nonsense; I've left specific examples on the user's talk page. If someone else unblocks, he or she will have to watch this user very carefully. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 19:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

==User:Meisterchef I just wanted to drop you a thank you for your swift attention to the issue you resolved for me. It's good to know that there are administrators here that are willing to do the right thing.

meisterchef 06:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Pile-on on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pile-on. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Frotz661 06:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the undelete. Pile-on is a bit of a mess, so I'll go ahead and adopt it for a while. Frotz661 09:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Revert Warring

Can you do something to stop the current revert warring being made on edits I am making regarding spelling mistakes. I would hate to see anyone brought before ARBCOM for their endless reverts because they dont like using non regional spelling. "Snorkel | Talk" 12:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

welcomenpov template change

That was fast! Thanks :-) -SpuriousQ 14:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)