User talk:LukeSurl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Luke is trying to take a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia in April. Most likely, however, Luke won't be able to keep away from Wikipedia for that long, and will probably be back a lot earlier while making some small edits every once in a while anyway.

I reserve the right to screw up any edits I make - If you think I've done something wrong, please Fix it. I really won't object to my edits been reverted, chances are I won't even notice. LukeSurl 13:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

/archive1

Contents

[edit] Fourth Annual State of Indian Nations Address

Thanks for fixing the link on Fourth Annual State of Indian Nations Address. It is much appreciated, KI 01:41, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scizor Animation

I was redirected to you. So, why remove the Scizor animation on the Pokemon Pearl/Diamond article? I rather liked it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Metnik (talkcontribs) 04:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC).

Indeed, I felt it illusated the topic well.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 03:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I agree that the previous animated Scizor image was easier for comparing the two genders. I suggest that we change it back, or at least make the current one animated like the other one was. -- WiiVolve 12:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editcountitis

You removed the (Except when it comes to voting in Wikipedia votes!!!) from WP:ITIS - it does matter! Those who had less than 400 edits were not premitted to edit. As an advocate but, at the time, only reasonably infrequent editor, who took care to preview and make significant changes rather than repeated one-line changes, I found myself disenfranchised, which is why I made the comment in the talk page a while back. You are right that once you have reached the arbitrary threshold, your one vote is as good as anyone else's but not until then. I take on board the later comment that it's possible to stuff votes if the threshold is too low, but I think 400 is almost certainly too high. Reverting your change. Ringbark 20:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: User:Fattdoggy's block

That user also created nonsense templates Template:Currentbox & Template:Wikicount. He made no useful edits, vandalizing and spamming talk pages.

[edit] Invalid Title

Looks like the Featured content tag is working again, so I deleted the Invalid Title redirect. Thanks for the note. NawlinWiki 19:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Calcutta Cup

Are you sure the comment about Wilkinson beating the record is not necessary? I'm not the one who added it in the first place but I think it's relevant somehow... If you don't mind I'm going to put it back...Saebhiar 14:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:AIV

Thank you for your recent posting of an anonymous editor to Administrators intervention against vandalism. In the future though, when reporting IP addressed to WP:AIV, please make sure that they have had a final warning in the recent past. Due to the nature of IP addresses, spans of time between edits may indicate different users. Being it is possible that the currently vandalizing user did not get a true final warning they are often not be blocked. To remedy this, please make an effort to ensure that all vandals reported to WP:AIV have an appropriate, and recent, final warning. The most common final warnings are {{test4}} or {{bv}}. If you have any questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to ask me on my user talk page. Thanks again!-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 65.91.28.2 (talkcontribsWHOIS)

I saw your note at the article talk page, which I why I didn't give a final warning upon their most recent edit after my most recent revert. I'll allow them some time to bring some sense to their contributions. If good faith edits fail to arrive, feel free to request my assistance. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 23:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. One more destructive edit and they face a block. -- Longhair\talk 23:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for the help. Im an expert on Lupe Fiasco but a newbie to Wikipedia. Thanks for giving me some tips. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sartaj (talkcontribs) 23:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Doctor Steel

LukeSurl, changes have been made to Doctor Steel and I would like to direct your attenation to the voting being done on the afd talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fenixasin (talkcontribs).

[edit] Thanks

Luke, thanks for your feedback on my I, Keano article. I appreciate it. Johnny Magorey 20:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Starslip Crisis

Would this be my leg being pulled? I'm not a great writer on comics, but I'd think that the way to prove that the ship is named after Johann Heinrich Füssli would be to reference some edition of the comic. Wikis are never acceptable sources. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

That makes perfect sense! It might be worth mentioning that somehow, otherwise someone else will be confused too. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Outstanding! Enjoy what's left of the weekend, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shambag

Please tell me what is wrong with the Shambag article and it will be corrected, I think it is perfectly encyclopedic and gives people an accurate insight into how Irish society is made up.garethppls(Talk) 13:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Corned beef

My edits are not tests, but thanks anyhow. Burntsauce 15:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Jeans

Your recent edit to Jeans (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Note: This was a mistake by myself, I accidentally double-reverted. I'm new to Twinkle -- LukeSurl 20:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for creating Zoroastrian wedding

Zoroastrian wedding is a fascinating article. Thank you for creating it. -- The Anome 22:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)