User talk:Luis María Benítez/2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Mensaje de un wikipedista norteamericano

¡Saludos, compañero de Wikipedia! I'm coming to Argentina soon and wanted to see if any of my fellow Wikipedians were interested in meeting up, etc...I'm flying into BsAs on Jan. 25th and I don't know many people there, so if you'd be into talking/getting together, let me know. Feel free to leave a message on my user page...seeya around - Paul 22:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC) P.S. Your "Seinfeld"-style logo is awesome

[edit] Helllooo Luis!

Thanks for the invitation! Argentines have been extremely welcoming to me (and I haven't even left the U.S. yet!) I will certainly try to come to Lobos...your city looks quite nice and I am very much looking forward to seeing the countryside and smaller cities than BsAs...I have been corresponding with a couple of Argentinean Wikipedians (User:Zzzzzzus and User:Mxcatania) and there is some talk of a meetup in February, which would be pretty chevere (do you use that word, or did my Spanish teacher make it up?) Anyway feel free to email me at apriori_paul_hanson AT yahoo.com . Have a good night and talk to you soon! Paul 23:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gracias por tu apoyo

Y sí, necesito ayuda. Podrías participar en las discusiones que tienen lugar en el Café de la wikipedia hispana o donde sea, exponiendo tu punto de vista.

También podrías recabar más apoyos. Yo sólo no puedo. Ya habrás visto como niegan los hechos. Y además apenas puedo conectarme a internet (porque no tengo ordenador en casa). --Visitante 18:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Acabo de leer tus valientes intervención en el Café de wikipedia, así como las de [[1]] o la de [[2]], al parecer en mis supuestas antípodas ideológicas. En [[3]] también podrás encontrar usuarios y administradores que se oponen a la censura. Por cierto, que el sistema imperante en la wikipedia podía definirse como "despotismo iletrado" (parafraseando la expresión "Despotismo ilustrado", aunque tal vez no valga para el inglés). Básicamente, una serie de administradores se arrojan el derecho a borrar toda información y artículos que no les guste o no comprendan, sin más explicación que su fanatismo e ignorancia (ninguna en los resumenes ni en la página de discusión).

Eres libre de usar mi informe como mejor te plazca. Incluso puedes refundirlo, borrando y añadiendo información como creas conveniente. Yo mismo añadí al final del mío un mensaje que me dirigió otro usuario hispano exiliado en esta wiki: User talk:Zapatancas --Visitante 15:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Hola, soy Visitante (otra vez, pero con el nick que usó aquí, que es el de User:Gimferrer. ¿Podrías enviarme un correo a la dirección visitantexiliado@yahoo.es? Seguramente te interese lo que tengo que contarte. --Gimferrer 11:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hola Luis

Primero supe de ti, cuando lei la biografía de Bjork, en donde hiciste un gran trabajo. Después empeze a tener problemas con usuarios como dodo, especialmente en la página Isaac Newton, en donde pedía que hubiera neutralidad ya que yo decía que Isaac Newton estaba interesado en la alquimia, esto sin tener la menor idea de la vida de Isaac Newton, ya que pude demostrar lo que ponía, y la pagina de Isaac Newton paso a ser un artículo destacado y en estos momentos se encuentra en la portada. Mi nombre de usuario en wikipedia en español es xocoyote. SIn embargo com tu, decidí retirarme con este mensaje.

"Aunque lo más importante de una biografía es por los motivos que es conocido, es tambien de gran importancia situarlo en un contexto histórico, conocer su personalidad, y entender porque hizo lo que hizo. La biografía forma parte de la historia y la historia no es sim'plemente un recopilación de datos importantes. La diferencia entre una buena biografía y una "monografía" de la papelería, es la diferencia entre saber y entender, la diferencia entre lo que puede hacer un humano y lo que hace una máquina. Saber que Hitler se suicidó no es lo mismo que entender porqué se suicido, conocer el teorema de Gödel no requiere ningun trabajo mental.

La alquimia no forma únicamente parte escencial en el contexto histórico en que vivía Newton. Para Newton la alquímia era un posible puente entre la teología y la filosofía natural. Encontrar este puente es lo que se le llama el proyecto Newtoniano, y era en lo único que pensaba Newton. Teología-Alquimia-Filosofía Natural.

Me parece que hay muchos usarios (como Ascánder y Dodo) que prefieren que wikipedia sea una recopilación de datos importantes, mi intención no es insultarlos, es proponer un cambio. Si wikipedia no es lo que yo creo que es entonces yo, como Newton que no quizo publicar el Opticks hasta que Hooke muriera, me abstendré de participar hasta que esto cambie--xocoyote 05:49 16 ene 2006 (CET)

y quize buscar otros usuarios que tuvieran las mismas opiniones que yo. Fue donde te encontre. No se de que sirve mi mensaje, simplemente de apoyo me parece. Saludos desde Mexico.....Xocoyote.--201.138.124.107 17:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:LMB_Archive.png

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LMB_Archive.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 08:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bloqueado

Hola, quizá hayas visto mi reciente actividad en la wikipedia hispana.

He sido bloqueado indefinidamente y baneado del IRC.

Socorro !

Mjoseph 06:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 13:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nice Niceland

Good job on the Niceland article. Now its at least readable and makes a certain amount of sense. Good job. Be proud. Gohst 06:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rosetta Sonda Interplanetaria.

Hola Luis, He leido tu articulo Rosetta Sonda Interplanetaria. Te felicito. Desde San José, California. Daniel.cavazos

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Björk_(Richard_Phibbs).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Björk_(Richard_Phibbs).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:19, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Earthimpact lmb.jpg

SEWilco 04:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Oddur Bjarnarsson LMB1.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Oddur Bjarnarsson LMB1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Björk Guðmundsdóttir LMB3.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Björk Guðmundsdóttir LMB3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Eyþór Arnalds LMB1.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eyþór Arnalds LMB1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Eyjólfur Jóhansson LMB1.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eyjólfur Jóhansson LMB1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jakob Smári Magnússon LMB1.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jakob Smári Magnússon LMB1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nav/contact/archive templates

Greetings! I moved three templates of yours to userspace, renaming them to User:Luis María Benítez/Navigation, User:Luis María Benítez/Contact, and User:Luis María Benítez/Talk archive. Since these were single user templates, having them in template space wasn't really the right way. You can have templates in your userspace just the same, so I moved them and updated all the links on your userpages where they were used. All the best, --Durin 13:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Randroide: Hola

Hola. Lo de la es:Wikipedia va, como no podía ser de otra forma, de mal en peor.

Como el mal, si no se le hace frente, no hace más que progresar (esto es de Ayn Rand), he tomado un par de iniciativas:

Página: User talk:Randroide/Abuse allegations in the Wikipedia in Spanish

Proyecto de userbox:

¿Para qué todo esto?.

• Para que hay un esfuerzo organizado de recogida de información "al otro lado del muro" (ver mi página de usuario) y de "apoyo psicológico" a los "exiliados" de es:Wikipedia.

• Porque la mera existencia de una organización "al otro lado" podría empezar a frenar los abusos más flagrantes (... pero creo que soy demasiado optimista al respecto).

• Porque, mucho me temo, algún día habrá que ir con todo el dossier de abusos e irregularidades a hablar con Jimbo Wales. Cuanto más gordo y con más abusos el dossier, más probable es que los dueños del invento entren en la es:Wikipedia como los SAS en la embajada de Irán (destitución de bibliotecarios "desde arriba", implantación de "policía" bajo órdenes de Jimbo y demás) , que, me temo que es lo que habrá que hacer al final.

Un saludo Randroide 16:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)