User talk:Lucky 6.9/Archives/Feb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< User talk:Lucky 6.9 | Archives

Contents

[edit] Deleated Page

Why did you do that to the page? Big Herk

- you didnt give me enough time to even add anything to it, i was still editing it, and how was it already for deleation if it hasn't even created it yet.

- thank you very much, i appreciate your cooperation. Mitchellandness1 04:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Varmint of Burke's Garden

Told you I was going to create this...I thought you might be interested in it.

Still nothing online about it, but I gather that locals remember the incident, as they apparently run a road race called the "Varmint" every year. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 01:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Headband

This user is requesting unblocking; you had blocked him for sockpuppetry, I believe for his edit to Stephen Michael Kaminski. Taking a look back, it looks like he was not in fact assisting in the recreation of the vanity page but was actually vandalizing it (not that that's much better) -- and he claims he's not the same user. Would you care to rule on it when you get a chance? Mangojuicetalk 14:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Weapons of Halo 2 - Deleted??

May I ask why you deleted the about article? You stated it as an original essay. I was getting information from notable sources, (Which I was going to provide), & had just placed a to be finished sign there (which I've done before), while I attended to a bigger matter. Could you undelete it as I was following every rule. If not, can you explain why?? Thanks, Spawn Man 02:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch! You're very understnading. Hey, if you can change the caps, I would be forever in your debt... :) Spawn Man 02:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks a bunch! Spawn Man 02:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SMiLE.dk Future Girls

Any particular reason why the track listing would be deleted? I'm brand new and I'm still getting the hang of how to post up stuff. I would love to have some help getting things straightened out, as I've got a lot of obscure knowledge to share. Sickhippie 03:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

How does that look now? Future Girls Sickhippie 03:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Good Times! I think I'll stick around and write a bit more. Sickhippie 04:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alaska cruises (sans "abuse")

Lucky, if you look at my contributions, you will see that my FIRST engagement with Alaska Cruise article was to remove the link and call into question the merit of the article. I'm trying not to "abuse" you here, but I really must say -- if the article is STILL an advertisement, then, by all means put it up for WP:AfD review. I don't give two shits about the article. If it's not advertising, though, and you're not willing to place it into AfD, then I think you owe me an apology. I didn't even WRITE the Alaska cruises content, I was trying to improve the work of some User:Steve356. I, too, was very suspicious of the external link in the article, but when I visited it, I could not detect any revenue-generating elements on the site whatsoever. Please, I really don't appreciate being threatened with a "break", when I have done nothing but try to help Wikipedia get a little better. --JossBuckle Swami 03:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the apology, and now, as I look further into the "meat" of that External Link, I am seeing that the site allows the visitor to purchase cruise tickets, using "referral" links to Orbitz, Travelocity, etc. Seems to me that that link absolutely must be deleted. I'll do it myself, and likewise apologize that I probably "defended" this article too personally. (I feel tricked, now that I see the ad-based nature of the third- and fourth-level pages of the site.) --JossBuckle Swami 04:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Macaw 54

I notice your comments on User talk:Macaw 54. We have just discovered that that user was a sock puppet of notorious plagiarist Primetime, who was banned by Jimbo. Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Primetime, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Primetime As a banned user all of his edits may be removed, and as a serial plagiarist all of his edits should be scrutinized with great prejudice. If you have a chance to review his article and talk page contributions on articles where you've worked with him it'd be a help. Macaw 54 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log). Cheers, -Will Beback 06:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Job For A Cowboy

Heyo, thankyou for unblocking the article for me! I have made it, (it's not my best but I guess it's a vast improvement on the last one!) If you could have a look and make any improvements, give me some suggestions etc that would be great as I need all the help I can get really. Thanks again.

--Davard 19:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brian Hunter (trader)

Hi Lucky, I see you got to this article before I had a chance, however I believe this is a notable person, and was readying to try and offer a quick expansion to the article before I take off for a hockey game. If it gets recreated again, I would ask that you let it stand long enough for me to expand on the creator's stub - probably later tonight. I cannot do this right away, but the article caught my eye, and seemed worthy: [1], [2], [3]. Thanks! Resolute 01:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Um, yeah. Brian Hunter is very notable due to having blown up a $6.5B hudge fund not too long ago. Please do restore the page if you can. User:Whiskey_Pete 02:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] William Sledd

A week or little more back the article on William Sledd was deleted. If you refer to the article discussion, i noted it would have been wise to wait a week, since it was simply a matter of days until he would be featured in the news. Indeed he was featured in a number of fashion glossies (glossy mags), one of which is the November edition of Women's Wear Weekly, and in the following link, (a very noted blog). Furthermore, his name has been searched in yahoo nearly 1000 which means its probably triple that in google (google don't reveal). The article was generating allot of traffic though i don't know how much exactly, and it was only deleted since a whole gang of people came on to show unwarranted support for its deletion. Please advise.

http://www.laist.com/archives/2006/11/13/the_newest_youtube_craze.php

Chavatshimshon 19:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Job For A Cowboy (Again)

Hey again! sorry to trouble you but no sooner did I make the article Job For A Cowboy someone came and deleted it again. I have contacted the admnistrator in question but on his user page it sais he will be on a break for a few weeks and I am getting pretty pissed off with this now! Any help would be appreicated.

--Davard 16:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Klik (band)

I noticed you deleted my recently created article on the band Klik, with the reasoning being non-notability. What exactly would qualify the band as notable? I can't seem to find wiki's policy on this, but I believe I had read once that being in a national publication was one of the qualifiers. Klik was featured in the 1000th issue of Rolling Stone Magazine and won their Ford Fusion contest. Does this not qualify? I hadn't put this info in the article at the time, because I was hoping to finish it up at my home where I have easier access to the sources and citations I'd need for the article. Your help is appreciated.

Xero Anarian 21:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Liam walls

If you have, or can take, a moment, please look at the edit war currently going on between this overactive Aussie and one of his friends (here: [[4]]) I have grown tired of playing tag with the two of them over two articles which are nothing more than nonsense. Thanks. ---Charles 01:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incomplete nomination

  • Space - Glory Through Conquest

There is an incomplete deletion nomination here... would it be possible for you to complete it by creating the subpage? The desired text is on the article's talk page. - 152.91.9.144 01:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, someone else got there already. Thanks. - 152.91.9.144 02:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: "Bloggers"

No problem. Thanks for the smile! ---Charles 04:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Hello Lucky 6.9, I noticed you deleted my article I created. I am entirely fine with your decision...all I want to know is why you deleted it so I can know in the future. Thanks!--Seadog 00:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome! The article was Wen Chang...It was extremely short though.--Seadog 00:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for page move

(I keep picking you since your name is at the top of Special:Log everytime I need something.) Could you please move Bilz y Pap to Compañia de Cervecerias Unidas? I've suggested it to the article's creator, but he will be too new to make the move. It's clear from the article's content that this (and the redirect it would leave) would be the appropiate thing. - 152.91.9.144 00:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Banned Users:

Since you are familiar with them, can you please add Wiki Brah and Maoririder to the "list of users banned by the community" here [5] in order to help admins in case any sockpuppet or new issues arise in regard to them? Thanks. Adam Nicholson 03:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Evan Finney

Hi! You posted good advice to User talk:Evan Finney. But since he identifies himself as an 11-year-old child, we need to remove any personally identifying information that he posts about himself. The policy is described here: WP:CHILD. I'm concerned that he's using his real name; I'm not sure if that's a problem in the absence of any other identifying information. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The kid also created an Evan Finney page; I speedy-deleted it. And since his personal information is still visible in the page history, I've posted a note to WP:ANI#WP:CHILD requesting that the page history be removed. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Woops

Hmmm... Guess there is no point in me trying to welcome Klose-up (I was just about to warn him about recreating his article, when I rechecked the article status). ;) Ah, well... =) Thanks for deleting his articles. And also all of the other work you do here. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Re your message: When the idiots get to me, I walk away from the computer and visit that other idiot box... television. Either that or have a bowl of ice cream. =) I know what you mean about editing with a touchpad. If I use my laptop for an extended amount of time ends up hurting my thumb pressing against the "mouse" button. Ouch. I usually plug in a mouse. Most of the time, I use my desktop to edit Wikipedia, but I'm having issues there, too, as the foot on my keyboard broke yesterday so things are either wobbly or at the wrong angle. Not good. =) -- Gogo Dodo 23:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiSmile

-WarthogDemon 08:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll just place this underneath the wiki smile, just stopping by to see how things are going Lucky. Talk to you soon! KOS | talk 08:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The troops are home!

I wrote a very important article regarding the troops coming home from Vietnam. You should take a look at it. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 18:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I uploaded the picture to Wikipedia as well. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
I already put it on DYK. I am so excited about this article! I mentioned it on the Reference Desk under Humanities, and a shitload of people were like "this isn't notable because I've never seen it before." It totally made me roll my eyes...dumbasses. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 04:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey!

Hey Lucky! I just wanted to let you know that you forgot to sign your post on Mcrrules' talk page. See ya later! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 02:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey, Lucky!

When you're deleting an attack page, it's probably a good idea to delete the attacks from the edit summary.  :) User:Zoe|(talk) 04:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Forgive Durden

I was wondering why you deleted the article on the band Forgive Durden. The article seemed decent to me for a stub and at the very most warranted editing.

Interestingly enough the albums of Forgive Durden are still wiki pages.

"Cast in the name of God, ye not guilty" 09:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bohol Churches

Trying my best with Churches in Bohol. Thanks for the encouragement! - Pinay06 05:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Popeye dies

  • I saw this on the deletion log and I could not stop laughing. I'm not even sure why. ^_^ Danny Lilithborne 02:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Some nut trying to argue that it's okay to say "Your God, my Satan" on Wikipedia. Danny Lilithborne 02:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Sylvan Learning v. Brainbench ?

Why is it that Sylvan Learning is allowed to exist on Wikipedia but Brainbench is summarily deleted? i.e., what "notability" (or whatever) guidelines did Sylvan Learning meet that Brainbench, Inc. cannot?

Stan Battles 02:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Innosense

I've just created an article for the first (and only) album So Together by the band Innosense (band). Just recently then, I noticed this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innosense and I'm wondering if it's okay for me to still go ahead with this. They do seem to be a notable band (albeit one album). Not sure where I should go for info on the band, but if I knew what sites I could refer to, I could get the band article going. -WarthogDemon 03:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Just after a little research I find that one of the members is Lynn Harless. This makes me even more surprised the band article got deleted, consdering she's the mother of Justin Timberlake!!!! -WarthogDemon 06:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
And to top it all . . . I just filled out the member box for the band. Three out of five already have their own wiki pages. -WarthogDemon 06:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About Lynn Harless

I just made a tiny little error - she was the production manager of the band Innosense, not one of the singers. Is she still notable however? -WarthogDemon 05:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recurring vandalism

Hi there Lucky. I'm sorry to have to trouble you with this, but I wonder if you could revisit the whole Harvardy business again.

Unfortunately, since you unblocked him he's continued vandalising Empire of Atlantium, exactly where he left off.

It's pretty obvious that he's set up a handful of sockpuppets, with the specific intention of vandalising that article and circumventing the 3RR. Georgewilliamherbert and Thatcher131 have also independently arrived at the same conclusion in relation to Harvardy's recent vandalism of micronation. The sockpuppets in question are:

In addition to the above he's also editing anonymously today using the IP 200.253.168.2 specifically to abuse the 3RR in order to revert Empire of Atlantium to his POV.

I am convinced that Harvardy/Crooked_allele/Enenkian/200.253.168.2 is Wik/Gzornenplatz etc - but whether he is or not is really beside the point now.

The fact of the matter is that whoever this person is, they're deliberately disrupting Wikipedia, vandalising fully-referenced article content and abusing the 3RR - and I'm asking you to consider applying a permanent block on the lot of them accordingly. --Gene_poole 03:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick action. I still think the main problem is Harvardy - but I'm happy to see his socks blocked in any case. These trolls just don't know when to give up. --Gene_poole 03:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, guess what? As soon as you blocked those two socks, Harvadry magically re-appeared and vandalised the article by reverting to the last version by Enenkian. They're obviously all Harvardy socks, and the edit summaries are all classic Wik. I think it's definitely time to block Harvardy for 3RR abuse and recurring vandalism. --Gene_poole 01:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You deleted my page

you deleted my page if you think it is worthy of deletion then please check out the following ,,,, framestore cfc, I placed my company as we have pioneered laser scanning and digital capture in the UK I have develeloped some of the most cutting edge equipment available. in my book thats an acheivement worth writing about.

You state at the top of your page you will gladly discuss any deletions, then please discuss with me why you saw fit to delete my page about rapido3d, yet pages such as Double negative, framestore cfc and moving picture company exist, please explain the difference between those pages and rapido3d.

I believe I wrote genune article about rapido3d and paid carefull attention to the articles mentioned above for reference. Rapidlaser 21:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Lucky - I responded on his talk page. I hope you don't mind. Thanks.--TheOtherBob 21:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Doodoocaca

You wrote on my talk page: Uh, what are you doing??You should know that I am more than aware of what constitutes a speedy deletion. The "Doodoocaca" article did not meet those criteria. I had nothing to do with the speedy delete on the article - I did a simple AfD nomination, and someone else closed the AfD early. Go ask them why they closed it early, as that was out of my hands. MikeWazowski 04:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Look, if you disagree with the AfD, make a case on the AfD page - don't go accusing me of bad faith nominations and falsely accusing me of having a history of doing so (as you did here) without proof. I gave my reasons, cited my evidence, and I stand by that - that's hardly bad faith. MikeWazowski 04:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Just for the record: Whom did you call a troll? You wrote: "Doodoocaca" Flash cartoon was tagged as a speedy by an apparent troll." Leibniz 11:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] restore away

- crz crztalk 04:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Jaw drops... ok... either restore it again, or go re-close the AfD I just re-opened and relisted...... - crz crztalk 04:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Saint International

Any chance I could persuade you to slap a {{db-author}} on this? It looks like an aborted VfD, but I can't find any such page as Saint International in the delete logs, and your commentary is coming up on some site searches... -- nae'blis 05:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "last" warning?

Why did you leave a "last warning" template on User talk:Feefeefee3 when there are no previous warnings on the page or in the history? wikipediatrix 22:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

There is not a requirement to step through the warning levels cardinally, simply that that is how it's normally done. There is not even in fact an requirement to issue a warning at all depending on the administrator's judgement. Of course, the inquisitional board gets the red-hot pokers ready if you do that...
152.91.9.144 05:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not the template!

I'm affraid that was a mistake! --Abu Badali 01:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Image:WikiThanks.png Hi, I hit 10,000 edits the other day and to commemorate this momentous (?) occasion, I wanted to leave a note to the various people I've run into on Wikipedia that have made an impact on my time here. Just wanted to say thank you. I'm still amazed at the rescue job you did with Alex Fox. Anyways, thanks for all the work you do around here. =) -- Gogo Dodo 01:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Db-author

Hi; you deleted this page under the "author mistakenly created" argument - was that a mistake, I hope? Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 02:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What are you doing?

You are deleting untagged articles. This is way not how its done, and for good reason. What are you thinking? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Herostratus (talkcontribs) on 04:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC); Please sign your posts!

  • Or maybe you know something I don't know? I'm looking at your log and you are deleting a ton of crap, and fast too. I don't do new page patrol very often, but I've never seen that many crap articles created that fast... are you picking them up from somewhere with a tool or something? Even so, this makes me very nervous... I regularly clean out speedied articles, and I think that two sets of eyes looking at an article before its deleted is a very good idea... Herostratus 04:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
    • What about Colletor. That is not close to being vandalism or nonsense and you deleted it just on your say-so. Herostratus 04:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
      • Er, apparantly this is standard practice, so OK, nevermind. I had not run across this before and I thought it was contrary to policy. (I think it maybe it should be, but I'm not sure of that either, depending on how much time is saved... anyway that's not at issue.) Sorry. I guess I got your case wrongly. Herostratus 07:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nomination?

Re your message: I thought about it and I would be honored if you nominated me. I am a little concerned that I might not be as well-rounded as people might want. It's been a long time since I've done other things than RC patrolling that people tend to focus on like AfD participation. I stopped doing AfD things because I found that I was just piling on and there didn't seem to be a point to that. I know how it works and all, but just haven't done it in awhile. My encyclopedia building isn't all that extensive either. But if you think these issues could be overcome and you're still willing to nominate me, I'm willing to give it a try. -- Gogo Dodo 19:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I will write neutral and sourced articles for you. Why do it yourself when I guarantee results and placement!!

Credentials: MBA, University of Miami, 2005 ; BA, University of Miami, 2003


Rates:

Stubs (under 200 words): $250

Regular Articles: $350 + 45 cents per word up to 350 words, then 35 cents per word up to 1000 words, then each additional word at 25 cents a word.

Featured Articles: $2500

Order before the end of the year and the first two photos included AT NO EXTRA CHARGE!!

Additional photos edited and formatted for reasonable rates.

[edit] Gene Poole

Can you block him for the 3r rule? I'm backing off his Empire for a while, but it doesn't seem that he should have cart blanche to self-aggrandize himself ad infinitum. Harvardy 04:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

You've broken numerous Wikipedia policies by (a) using multiple sockpuppets to subvert the 3RR, (b) blanking referenced content, (c) using misleading edit summaries and (d) removing valid warnings from your user and talk pages. You're also not fooling anyone with your red-herring edits and talk page trolling. Whether you are Wik or not is irrelevant. You've earned yourself a block, and you're going to get it. --Gene_poole 05:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pick-Up Mastery on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pick-Up Mastery. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. (I'm not the DRVer—I likely agree with your deletion, if not with your "reason"—but thought you might like to know...) Joe 07:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Just wondering if you could have a look at this

Hi. If you get the chance, can you have a look at this AfD? It seems like the nominator is trying to make a point as much as he is trying to get the article deleted, although it's hard to tell if this is a good-faith but misguided attempt to get what he wants or a deliberate thing. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] happy Turkey Day!!!!!

I wish you a very merry Thanksgiving! Hope you and your family have a magnificent day! So, what are you thankful for? Hooray and happy gormandiziŋ! --Randfan please talk talk to me!
Happy Turkeyday! Cheers! :) —Randfan!!
Happy Turkeyday! Cheers! :)Randfan!!
Have a great day! Please respond on my talk page (the red "fan" link in my signature). Cheers! :)Randfan!!
Thanks! Cheers! :)Randfan!! 16:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion?

Why did you delete Pakistani general election, 2007? It's an election which certainly will take place, which is by definition notable, which is talked about a lot in many local and international media... I just don't get it. —Nightstallion (?) 17:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Innosense Claimed As Being Non-Notable

Innosense was deleted as being non-notable. User:NawlinWiki brought it back up and advised me to expand it and I have. Still concerned that the article is stil at risk of AfD. If that's the case, will it be of any use to contest it? (I'm only asking you since I recall you suggesting to contest this article; I probably should have days ago so I'm wondering if I should now. I hope my asking isn't seen as me asking friends to side with me on this. *Recalls reading something in the policy that forbad that.*) -WarthogDemon 04:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gogo Dodo's RfA

I convinced Gogo Dodo to accept my nomination for adminship, and he also mentioned that you offered a nomination a few days ago. He said he wasn't sure what happened, but I went along and created the page and added a brief introduction to the RfA. I just wanted to let you know, so that you can co-nominate Gogo Dodo if you wish. Thanks. =) Nishkid64 18:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah. Here's the link: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gogo Dodo. Nishkid64 18:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ?

Hi Lucky! Does this person [6] remind you of someone? (I thought of the connection after this coincident edit [7]). Funny how you get a "copper's nose" (Tony Sidaway's phrase) after doing this for a while. Hope you're having a great long weekend! Antandrus (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Hm, not 100% sure on this one; but I think so. I'm wrong about these things sometimes ... :) Antandrus (talk) 00:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
He's no newbie [8] LOL!! He just "happened" to know the name, and I couldn't even think of it. Antandrus (talk) 00:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

No question. He's requested an unblock. Denied, of course. I just have too much to do on this site and holding this guy's hand once again is NOT one of them.  :) - Lucky 6.9 00:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  :O

Protect Conflicted on that sock! :P Last time I try to help a {{helpme}} :P — Deon555talk 00:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

p.s.: still working on that archival bot thing, I don't think it's accepting new "customers", your best bet is to leave a request at User:EssjayBot III, and Essjay will set it up :) Slater — Deon555talk 00:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks :) Yeah, I've always liked chatting to Essjay, too bad there aren't more nice guys around eh :P — Deon555talk 00:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2 Boob Productions

You deleted this as "NN company, banned user". Am I missing something on the banned user page? Is Suzy77 (talk contribs) a recarnation or someone that I'm missing? Thanks, Metros232 00:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Sherman

Hi, perhaps you can help. You appear to have deleted & blocked the page. Im a bit confused.


I received a post complimenting my addition to deborah cooper and requesting the singers bio be expanded and 'wikified'. granted this is new to me but i AM trying

- the block may have been due to the fact i used a template, my first time, when i didn't see it in my contributions or search , I thought i forgot to hit submit, so i recreated it. It was not intended to be malicious at all.

Per the request in seeking further information on the Artist Deborah Cooper I found her Manager, who is well known in the industry and created a page. It was not to advertise, rather to enhance the previous article, add someoen apparently a significant contributor to entertainment, dance music and AIDS fundraising. From some source material I saw promotional information, not relevant to actual contribution to the industry which i did not include. Checking the references of society of singers , a 501 (c) 3 registered charitys newlsetter, available onlien and shows his contributor status a "major", his work with celine dion and other artists. The Centaur music page refers to his "long term' professional relationship with Singer Deborah Cooper;

Such cavilier deletions causes concern as to contributing, and obfuscates the purpose of this site

I used a few established wiki pages of similar people like michael ovitz to base the layout and info on. Im unsure how any living or dead persons write up wont sound like it is somewhat promoting "look at what he/she did" however i was providing facts


I sincerely request it be undeleted ( sorry not familiar with wiki terms)

Starburster 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tirumala Deva Raya

Hi, you deleted this article. I didn't create it, but I saw it, and the Vijayanagar Empire apparently exists. I was in the process of adding the wikilink when you deleted it, and I didn't see the speedy delete code in the deletion log. What was the basis for deleting it? Thanks. Darkspots 02:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Haven't gotten a response from you about this, and I can see that you've made a number of contributions since I asked you to let me know the basis for your speedy deletion of the article. You did not cite any criteria when you deleted this article. What specific criteria for speedy deletion did you use to delete this article? Obviously, I do not feel that it meets any of the CSD, and I'm interested in finding out your reasoning. Thanks! Darkspots 16:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redirect of Stunt pilots

Thanks for changing the stub to a redirect. Now I have somebody with whom to discuss it. ;-)

I actually put a fair amount of thought into it, and considered a disambiguation page, but its half-life would be about 5 seconds, since there were really only 2 possible destinations: Stunt performer and Barnstorming. Dab pages with only 2 links are ruthlessly hunted down, so I made it a stub, in order to give it a half-life of 20 minutes. Now, I am sure that in the heyday of barnstorming, that was the first place the movie producers looked for stunt pilots, and there was a phenomenal amount of personnel overlap, but it didn't seem right to send a reader off to Barnstorming without offering them a chance to see Stunt performer. Maybe what is needed is a section about movie stunt performing in the Barnstorming article, with a discussion of the interrelation of the two professions, or maybe that would mean too much duplication. Your ideas on this, please. Chris the speller 02:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, it's back to the stub format for now, offering the 2 destinations. Remember, any landing you can walk away from is a good landing. Many happy landings! Chris the speller 02:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Sherman

CLARIFICATION;

Appreciate your prompt reply, I did not take it personal, Its just confusing especially in light of the indicted paragraph below, complimenting & requesting i contribute and expand.

I cant address previous posts other than my own as stated I IN ERROR reposted, as As its "not personal" july and november shown previous contributors are beyond my control. only 1 November post and the repost is mine, it did not show on "my contributions" I thought i erred forgetting to hit submit.


I used established wiki pages of similar people, like michael ovitz, william morris, to base the layout and info on.

One is hard pressed not to find any entertainers, living person reference not to appear promoting or vanity in some way, (i am afraid to even look up donald trump) as these people contribute and make differences, but i provided facts, not opinions, and checked and provided references:

example; checked the references of society of singers, a 501(c)3 registered charity; online newsletter verifies his association, They state his contributor status a "major", They show his work with celine dion and other artists. The separate Centaur music page refers to his professional managerial relationships with other singers. These are third party published facts, not my opinion.

if specific sections cause concern, identifying same would be helpful, as I have other pieces, info, people I would like to contribute however, respectfully, I too value my own free time and time expended in same.

>It was this message that even initiated my further research and contribution:

"Good text edit on the Deborah Cooper article. It's perfect for what I think Wikipedia stands for. You might want to Wikify the article to make it look better and tie it in with the main article instead of putting it at the bottom, but aside from that and maybe expanding a couple of sections, it's looking good. Thanks. (Krushsister 03:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC))"

Many 90's to current dance artists refer to him either in their career, or as introducing entertainers to perform at aids and charity fund raisers.  Your definition of vanity may help

In light of my clarification. I request it be unblocked and undeleted, appreciate your assistance, regards R.S. Starburster 02:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PSCC

That's cool that you live near-by it! If you feel you can expand it, please do! Patken4 03:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gregor Samsa (band) on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gregor Samsa (band). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --Earl_CG 11:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Sherman

Thank you for your help:

03:42, 25 November 2006 Lucky 6.9 (Talk | contribs) restored "Scott Sherman" (31 revisions restored: Apparently notable; user has requested a chance to clean up the "adspeak.")

Hi, I tried to edit the page but it is still protected and wont come up..ideas?

btw. i Loved the 6.9 and i remember the automatic level adjusting, depending on weight, was a very cool innovation. Starburster 20:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


Hi There Re: Facialbuilding

I was told to leave a message and did so on Talk:Facialbuilding Please let me know why it was considered advertisement/spam. From what I understand if you have been published by a third party, been around for several years (27) and a legitimate form of training.... what's the problem? First I was accepted and told to lengthen the article and when I did...(named the muscles targeted when training, I was deleted??? Why wasn't I given a chance to explain?

[edit] User:Must...edit...wikipedia

Uh, he's registered with yahoo.se. Anybody can register with yahoo.se. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Not acting up, but he did send an appeal to the unblock-en mailing list. I did some research of his editing and he didn't appear to have made any valid edits, and told him so, but that you had unblocked him, so I appealed for him to please make some good faith edits. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, User:AsteroidAnaconda has also appealed his block. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Aaaahhhh!!! Please don't let me spoil your night! Edit! User:Zoe|(talk) 00:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

) User:Zoe|(talk) 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No Way Out (band)

You might want to check this out. •Elomis• 03:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

  • It's been recreated as No Way Out (Band). Danny Lilithborne 03:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do not indef IPs without closer scrutiny

If you had only taken a moment to run a reverse DNS lookup on

you'd see it belongs to webcache.blueyonder.co.uk and not to a single user. --  Netsnipe  ►  05:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Summer performing arts

Wow. I am considering opening a Wikicafe that sells exclusively decaf so this doesn't happen. Nice work keeping a cool head! •Elomis• 07:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

do you remember meeeeee?



Hey, question.

I was here yesterday and there was a very resourcefull summer performing arts page up here.. Ive been searching for it for about a half hour, but cannot seem to find it. It had alot of usefull info, and I am needing it right now. Please message me back and tell me where it is/what happened to it/and where i can find it kthanks!

[edit] Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
You greeted me on my first day on Wikipedia. You helped me those first days, and I never got to thank you. I've seen you around a lot, and think you are a fine contributer as well. Without your help in my first days, I'd probably would've ended up blocked or something. You pratically inspired me to become a wikipedia editor. :) andrew|ellipsed...Speak 02:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)




Hey, question.

I was here yesterday and there was a very resourcefull summer performing arts page up here.. Ive been searching for it for about a half hour, but cannot seem to find it. It had alot of usefull info, and I am needing it right now. Please message me back and tell me where it is/what happened to it/and where i can find it kthanks!

[edit] DYK reffing

Hi Lucky. I was wondering if you were noticing the feedback on your DYK noms. There is a policy that actual reference are required rather than external links to the references. I think this is the second time this has happened - are you aware of this? Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Pavlina Page

This page should be restored and unprotected. It is an extremely active site with millions of views and a very active message board. It is perhaps one of the most popular blogs online. Be a responsible administrator and spend 5 minutes researching it and review your decision. --74.57.238.173 05:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles

See the talkpage - there's an article which I would like some help with from members of the project. Thanks, --SunStar Net 11:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Marek on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Anna Marek. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Hektor 13:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC).

Just adding, it seems you reference an AfD on the matter and we can't seem to locate it. Any clue? --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Neville

I have worked very hard on editing the David Neville article so you would OK yet. I left a message on my talk page, where we were having a brief conversation, saying I wouldn't be able to finish it until tomorrow. Still, it was deleted before I had a chance to finish editing. Can you get it back up and explain what you want from me (because none of that was plagiarised) or at least get someone from Wikipedia to work on the page themselves. He is a very noteworthy athlete and person.

And I agree with elmarko99 you need to give people more of a chance to post pages. I'm an avid supporter fo Wikipedia and always defend it when my teachers regard it as illegitimate. Although this does support my argument that only factual, high-quality articles are admitted, it is very frustrating for me when trying to get a page on wikipedia. --Jesse1992 05:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Way back when...

You once stated that you went to Club 33. May I inquire as to how you got in? Are you a member, or did a member allow you the privilege? Just curious. Gracias. --Ali'i 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. It sounds like you had a great time. Next time I'm in California, I plan on being there. Might I add that you seem like a nice, genuine person... unlike many here at WP, no offense. Keep up the good work. I've heard Kerry is a great person from others as well. Now I just have to learn to play the harpsichord and I'll be set. Mahalo. --Ali'i 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] William Sledd

William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Vandal Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Here's another barnstar for you for all of your newpage vandal watching. Diez2 03:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Well Welcome Back!

Hope you liked your break. :) Hope I've kept your talk page sane; these past few days have been odd. oO -WarthogDemon 06:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Safiyya bint Huyayy

Thanks Lucky, (i had a name change) I'm in talks with him, hope to restore it soon. In the meantime can I request your input to the Safiyya bint Huyayy article. Please read the talk page on the current edit war issue. Safiyya was a jewish girl who was taken by Mohammad as a concubine. You can read the article and it tells you the story in all the bloody detail black on white, yet when I put on the lead paragraph that she was a concubine it was reverted by another editor a number of times, and this has gone on. Please comment on the talk page there. FrummerThanThou 07:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] El-Manial

I don't get it.. why redirect the El-Manial article to Cairo? --Ahmed 07:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Ahh... I guess the Districts of Cairo template will need some work. --Ahmed 07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Serbius

The send me a link to where i can post a 'personal message' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OllieQueen (talkcontribs) 19:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Thanks for the help. Is there any way to make the title of the new article Serbius though? (Rather than User: OllieQueen)


[edit] kismetologist

sorry, i'm confused. i am trying to request a deletion review for better than. can't figure out why you deleted it in the first place though, it's a contemporary philosophical principle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kismetologist (talkcontribs) 19:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

lucky...i got the information and the essay from the philosophical source...ie 'messenger' or speaker for the movement The Fellowship of Fortuna. The speaker created this philosophy Better Than. It is new, so i don't believe it would be widely referenced except on the fellowship of fortuna site which i liked to. i received the essay (unpublished) from the source himself. what do you suggest here? i think it is an important philosophy and the background, i believe is important too.


[edit] Islamic Extremist Terrorism

I wonder do you even check the integrity of the sources which are being refered in the above mentioned article? In the category of Further Reading, where does this highly controversial person comes called Rober Spencer? I know you will not agree. But just look at the wiki article jihad and look at the contents of jihad watch website. Consider my references to be my arguments (please). Have a look at this video and tell me whats wrong here? how is this media totally unreliable. The same thing is applied to jihad watch by comparing to the wiki article Jihad.

My key point is, why dont you consider the integrity and controversy of the sources being refered?

Your arguments are welcomed. But I just want to make you see few references in comparison. VirtualEye 08:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:WarthogDemon

I was looking around and I saw you offered to nominate him for adminship. I've done the same thing.diff Great minds think alike, eh? When he feels ready to test his luck with going into the supply closet to get the mop and bucket, make sure you let me co-nominate him. Happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 18:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Short Articles

I'm trying to expand details on Old Newingtonians who are Olympians and medallists so I was listing their Olympic achivements and intended to add further biographical material but now I can't. How would you suggest i go about this.--Sbrandons 04:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Reposting

I thought thats what stubs are for? so people can expand the article. DarkCastle 04:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. DarkCastle 04:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Athepirate08

hi, i am kind of confused, I am new at this, but I just made a page for a church located in wylie, texas: Jesus Name Pentecostal Church The Refuge, and I was wondering why it was deleted. I really put a lot of work into it, and its a real church, and it was instantly deleted. please help or explain. thanks.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athepirate08 (talkcontribs) 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Been Thinking About A Page

I've asked an admin on this already and he was unsure but said "maybe" on it, so I'd like another admin's opinion. I'm considering making an article for a small ghost town in Colorado. Emphasis on small. I can't find it in an atlas. I've googled the town and most of the google hits are from the movie Red Dawn that was filmed there. I did find coordinates of the place and at least one or two places listing it as a mining town in the past. The town is Calumet, Colorado if you wish to do the search yourself. My question is, if I have the coordinates, list the source, note the movie, and find some reliable reference of it being a mining town it'll still be a stubby article. Would it be a notable article? -WarthogDemon 07:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spell for Chamelion (film) page

Why did you delete the Spell for Chamelion movie page I creaed? - Peregrinefisher 07:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to guess it's because you delete a bunch of bad pages, and mine was caught in the net somehow. If you're deleting so many you can't answer, I understand, otherwise reply here. - Peregrinefisher 08:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Alburnus Maior NGO

Hi. Thanks for patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism and erroneous new pages. I'm wondering if you could review your decision to delete my stub on the Alburnus Maior NGO. It's notable in terms of its successful advocacy for suspending the Rosia Montana mining project: a proposal to build the largest open-pit gold mine in Europe. Google search link -- 41,300 results.

Thanks Jackk 15:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Much Appreciated! Thanks for your time.

Jackk 16:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Considering Making Some Articles Into Redirects

The other day I decided to have the article Lynn Harless deleted, as I didn't have as much info on her as I though. (Originally I thought she was a band member, but after finding I was incorrect I had nothing more to say other than her managing of bands and her being Justin Timberlake's mom.) And now I'm wondering if I should change these four people into redirects:

I'm considering this because they seem to be two stubby. (However the other two members have more of a history than just being in Innosense.) Not sure if I should keep them as is or go along with that. Part of this is because of a nasty vandal incidence, so I'm a bit biased, so I'd like to know what you think. :) -WarthogDemon 02:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Or shouldn't I be asking? >_> Forgive me if that's the case. -WarthogDemon 00:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry 'bout that. I looked at a couple and they seemed to be of sufficient length. I usually take the single-sentence entries and convert them. - Lucky 6.9 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete my Louisa Swain article?

This was the 1st lady to vote in the USA after 1807.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by James possamai (talkcontribs) 16:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Renetto

Hi they are trying to delete the renetto article you reinstated. What is your take, is his reason even valid?

FrummerThanThou 17:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Girvin

I'm curious as to why the page on Tommy Girvin was deleted. Gringo300 21:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] information gathering

I'm working on gathering information on Tommy Girvin. I think i should probably provide some links as references, too. Gringo300 00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] That was a compliment, just not a very clear one

/* Jodi Foster voice */ Was that fast? That looked fast... Wow. - 152.91.9.144 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, that was oblique to the point of obfuscation... What I meant was you appear to have deleted that page within two seconds of my having tagged it for deletion. I was impressed with your alacrity, and the "Jodi Foster" thing was a quote from Maverick (film) with respect to a quick-draw gunslinger. So, umm, yeah... Keep up the good work. - 152.91.9.144 03:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Am I Asking Something I Shouldn't?

I asked for an opinion here: [9] and I'm wondering if you missed it or if I shouldn't be asking questions on talk pages like that. >_>; -WarthogDemon 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Seems one of them was just marked an AfD. I'll just see what happens to it and then consider the same actions for the other pages I mentioned. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Templates

Hi, Lucky 6.9. I know that you're too busy on vandal reverting, and deleting non-notable articles. Anyways, I just want you to explain how could I arrange my template boxes on my user page. In my opinion, most of wikipedian uses babel to arrange the templates on their user page. I know that some templates has been moved into other names, deleted, or some templates doesn't work on babels like such template User who is birthday is May 14, and favourite color is Blue. Could you please help me on this? I'm having trouble to arrange templates on my user page. Cheers! Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilogos

You might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 16:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Hello this is BobafettH23. On Kingalex56, on the link of; Why The @#$% I was banned, an ip address (82.7.125.98) vandalized that page by writing "fuck you", and erasing some stuff. Let me know when the matter has been taken of. Thanks. BobafettH23 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How long?

Did your retirement last? Brainhell 01:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Thank You!

Thank you very much for your contributions and your help in my quest to keep Wikipedia a Clean and Reliable source for Information. I've seen your name pop up quite often in the recent changes article and you've been deleting a lot of articles that I've been marking. I want to let you know your actions are not going unnoticed and I appreciate every little thing you do for the WikiCommunity. I thank you, and Beg you to have a great day. Take it easy, and If it's easy, take it twice!

  • No, Thank You!

I very much appreciate your contributions to wikipedia and admire your dedication to the site. I think it's great that you of all people are an Admin, because you uphold and defend all that is good in Wikipedia. I appreciate all your work and the fact that you even had time to respond to me. Though I am likely not a well enough established member of Wikipedia to award you a Barnstar, I most certainly will remember to do so later. I often do see your name pop up on the Recent changes log, and I smile every time I do, because I know someone is working just as hard as I am to keep Wikipedia a great public databank of credible, reliable information.

With Deep Respect and gratitude Carlo V. Sexron 02:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

P.s.

Though I haven't yet given you a barnstar, I can at least throw this back at you!

Thank You! You ARE appreciated!

Carlo V. Sexron 02:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

  • Honored

I thank you very much for your kind words and again taking time out of your day to communicate with me and respond to my message. I would be more than ecstatic to continue helping Wikipedia be a finer site than it already is. It's nice to know that someone is watching my work too! And I thank you for that! It makes every movement seem to go further and bit by bit, I like to think that we are both doing our parts for the community.

With Sincere Respect and Joy Carlo V. Sexron 03:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron


  • [[user:Flowerykewlstuffz123]]

Can you please do somethiing about this user? It seems like they've only created useless nonsense and is trying to defend two articles s/he made with No sources. Although I admit I did use the 'spam' tag on them, I think it was effective in getting the point through that they are basically articles that are going to get deleted anyway. He made a page for slang that NO ONE in the world uses, only his school, which should have been merged with his school anyway.

  • Thanks For the Encouragement

I'm sure you get a lot of that as an Admin, I think I really needed that because I thought there would be no Justice to that. Until my dreams come true and there is a Template:Db-crap tag, I guess db-vandalism and db-nonsense will have to fill the gap.

  • Keep Up the Good Work!

Hang in there, Wikipedia Loves you!

I appreciate all the hard work and effort you give to the Wikipedia Community!

Trying to relieve some stress and pressure, Carlo V. Sexron 11:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

[edit] Can You Help Me Out?

Someone whom I am fairly certain is a sockpuppet of User:MinervaSimpson and User:MrBullockx is back as User:Systemex. -WarthogDemon 02:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Not sure how it goes when listing Sockpuppets but I believe it should be a sockpuppet of MrBullockx (that was made first). -WarthogDemon 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Erm, sorry. One more thing. Should MinervaSimpson have the same message? It only says there that the user is simply blocked indefinite; no sock puppet message. Sorry bout that. ^_^; -WarthogDemon 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Faith

The choice is yours of course, but I find it slightly suspicious that he mentioned User:Wooty, the one who placed the sockpuppet block on User:MinervaSimpson. Oo -WarthogDemon 03:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smbat III

Hello may i ask why you deleted my article? Nareklm 03:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well i was still in the process of making it. Nareklm 03:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Well it was Smbat III, if you check the delete log i think its that. Nareklm 03:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you :-D Nareklm 03:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Lucky 6.9, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Lucky 6.9]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk | Contribs 04:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Both, as in adding the category and the userbox? You don't need to. Just putting the userbox automatically adds you to the category! James086Talk | Contribs 10:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Popark.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Popark.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] billy wright (american poet) article.

i created an entry for Billy Wright the poet who was featured in the recent issue of Words Dance and also has published his own works and it was immediately deleted. why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.158.103.247 (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Another barnstar for you Lucky 6.9!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Lucky 6.9, have this barnstar for all your hard work salting articles that are patent nonsense/recreated hoaxes/non-notable biographies etc., and for your anti-vandalism work! SunStar Nettalk 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Please can you delete, and then salt User:SunStar Net/Thisisapatentnonsensepage at my request?? Glad you like the barnstar! --SunStar Nettalk 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you please salt it for me. Keep the good work up new page patrolling.... see my NPP exploits at

User:SunStar Net/Pages I tagged for speedy deletion, and feel free to review me at Wikipedia:Editor review/SunStar Net 2.

Thanks, --SunStar Nettalk 00:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Norman Window Page

You left a message to me about the Norman Window page i made and said: "Using sockpuppet accounts to repost nonsense is a blockable offense. Please do not attempt to do so again. Thank you. - Lucky 6.9 04:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)"

First of all, Im sorry if i was posting nonsense, I'll be sure to cite works and sources next time Second of all, i would just like to make it clear that i did not make a sockpuppet account, if you check your logs, you can see the IPs are different for the 2 posts and the my IP from this message will confirm i did not write the article the second time, only the first time. Thanks

[edit] Systemex

He's just put up a controversial article as a Featured Candidate. (Just like MrBullockx. Might want to have checkuser for all 3.) The article is here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/New antisemitism. -WarthogDemon 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know I've reblocked Systemex following confirmation he was a sockpuppet. the wub "?!" 23:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Optigan35011.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Optigan35011.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas M. North

He is a real person worthy of a page. If you have a valid reason for repeatedly deleting it, please give it to me rather than constantly removing what I post. kthanksbye Nbruschi 02:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


Sorry about the reverts, I did not see what you wrote on my page until just now. Now that there is an article page I will work on expanding it. Thanks for your help and sorry for the trouble. Nbruschi 02:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


sorry again for the confusion. Nbruschi 03:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] From Rhthpr

so why can't that sentence be the start of an article? Other people who are knowledgable or currently researching can add to it Rhthpr

One more thing... you or your bot deleted my first question on your talk page, so why can't I blank out my own talk page? Rhthpr 08:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm no bot... -WarthogDemon 08:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not A Problem Helping Out

FYI, one evening I had the idea to check your logs for any articles that get recreated, and retag them. I was pratically editing non-stop for about 20 minutes. Needless to say, I have a small idea of the chaos you have to deal with. Continue with the good work as well! *Salutes.* :) -WarthogDemon 08:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dominic Janes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dominic Janes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Generally, I hod noticed that it was deleted and protected and figured that I should find a suitable article or stub to go in its place. Cheers! ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 18:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] My Kung-Fu Sweetheart (film)

I was just checking and tidying a new article, when I found upon saving that you'd deleted it without explanation. I've recreated it pending some sort of reason. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

But it didn't lack content; it said that it was a film made in Hong Kong, gave its year of production, the director, the cast, a link to IMDb, and a stub. You deleted it within five minutes of its initial created; as the criteria for speedy deleteion advise, contributors should be given time (and, for courtesy's sake, a message of explanation). It's not as is it was clearly added in bad faith. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
You not only deleted the original article far too hastily, you then deleted my edited recreation without contacting me. The former is discourtesy towards the original contributor, and a great way to put people off from contributing; the latter was discourtesy towards me. Deleting my messages from your Talk page isn't a good sign either. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, and I should calm down too. But the lack of one sort of content isn't a complete lack of content, and certainly doesn't qualify under the meaning of the Act. It worries me that people are adding articles in good faith, only to see them disappear with no explanation; it's not good for Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; sorry not to have replied immediately — I realised that I was tired and ired, and needed to go to bed. I'll keep an eye on the article, as well as doing a little digging myself. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan wang

It appears as if you wanted to salt this page. You forgot to protect it. --- RockMFR 00:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo

I believe you've deleted this article: Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo and it came up again last night. The creator has made other contributions that do not appear to be copyvios, and this person has told me that this isn't a copyvio and has even expanded it after I suggested he/she do so. I'm assuming good faith in that he's not copying anymore; I can't seem to find that it is a copyvio, but I'd just like to check with you. -WarthogDemon 01:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You stated I shouldn't post advertising to Wikipedia.

Can you elaborate on that for me? What did I do that was advertising? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsmallz (talkcontribs) 02:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays


Merry Christmas, Lucky! Wishing you all the best and lots of happiness. I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. SWAdair | Talk 04:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sparisi1122

I shortened your block on User:Sparisi1122 because when I checked, I found a number of good contributions from this user. It is clear that the user was vandalising and so a block was definitely called for. It is not my intention to wheel-war with you, however. If you feel my actions were inappropriate, please discuss this with me on my user discussion page. Thanks, have a good day. --Yamla 16:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Mediation has been requested regarding your edits; the case is Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page. I just signed up as a mediator - would you accept me? Thanks, — Sebastian 21:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply on my talk page. I would like to see your statement on the mediation page. You are free to write it on the talk page, or, if you accept me as the mediator, I can work it into the "What's going on?" section. If you would rather have a different mediator, please let me know (per wiki or email) so we can find someone else. Thank you for your cooperation. — Sebastian 01:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting complaint

I see you deleted a complaint I made about deleting an article. Why was this? deleting complaints makes you look sensitive. Don't you like being questioned? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Totnesmartin (talkcontribs) 23:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep blocking vandalism accounts! I'm awarding you a Barnstar for your good work! HyperSonicBoom 01:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WoWWiki

Did you just edit the WoWWiki? --69.142.120.32 01:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You did not go to WoWWiki.com on Dec 13, register the name Lucky 6.9, and ask to become an admin? --69.142.120.32 01:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
This is the relevant link: http://www.wowwiki.com/User:Lucky_6.9 Kirkburn 01:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. That's cleared that up at least :) Kirkburn 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I Am So Confused . . .

I did have suspicions about that Case about your talk page, but thought it too immediate to just report it as a troll, so I decided to see if I should add my commentary there. I see it's been deleted and the user blocked. What exactly is going on? Oo -WarthogDemon 01:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. Sorry about that. Wished I decided to take action sooner. : / -WarthogDemon 01:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I don't know what's going on; whether it's a joke; or whether Lucky is completely out-of-control... but, I do NOT appreciate being asked to contribute comments to something that, to me, DID indeed seem legitimate, then have my comments ERASED from the ether by the very person who is the target of the complaint. You didn't even comment to me what was going on, Lucky. I think you should be blocked for a month, so that you can begin to understand that you are trampling on the time and energy of dedicated, innocent volunteers. --JossBuckle Swami 02:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I see nobody has bothered to let you know ...

You're being talked about. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry about it. I get these attacks weekly and tend to just ignore them. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You should know that if you're mentioned on a Mediation page and refuse mediation, it just closes? You didn't need to delete it, just say you refuse, and it's all over. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Ask for further opinions on the admin page, see what conensus is. If they see undelete it, then go ahead and do it, and just say you refuse mediation. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Way back when...

You once stated that you went to Club 33. May I inquire as to how you got in? Are you a member, or did a member allow you the privilege? Just curious. Gracias. --Ali'i 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. It sounds like you had a great time. Next time I'm in California, I plan on being there. Might I add that you seem like a nice, genuine person... unlike many here at WP, no offense. Keep up the good work. I've heard Kerry is a great person from others as well. Now I just have to learn to play the harpsichord and I'll be set. Mahalo. --Ali'i 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] William Sledd

William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Vandal Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Here's another barnstar for you for all of your newpage vandal watching. Diez2 03:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Well Welcome Back!

Hope you liked your break. :) Hope I've kept your talk page sane; these past few days have been odd. oO -WarthogDemon 06:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Safiyya bint Huyayy

Thanks Lucky, (i had a name change) I'm in talks with him, hope to restore it soon. In the meantime can I request your input to the Safiyya bint Huyayy article. Please read the talk page on the current edit war issue. Safiyya was a jewish girl who was taken by Mohammad as a concubine. You can read the article and it tells you the story in all the bloody detail black on white, yet when I put on the lead paragraph that she was a concubine it was reverted by another editor a number of times, and this has gone on. Please comment on the talk page there. FrummerThanThou 07:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] El-Manial

I don't get it.. why redirect the El-Manial article to Cairo? --Ahmed 07:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Ahh... I guess the Districts of Cairo template will need some work. --Ahmed 07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Serbius

The send me a link to where i can post a 'personal message' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OllieQueen (talkcontribs) 19:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Thanks for the help. Is there any way to make the title of the new article Serbius though? (Rather than User: OllieQueen)


[edit] kismetologist

sorry, i'm confused. i am trying to request a deletion review for better than. can't figure out why you deleted it in the first place though, it's a contemporary philosophical principle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kismetologist (talkcontribs) 19:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

lucky...i got the information and the essay from the philosophical source...ie 'messenger' or speaker for the movement The Fellowship of Fortuna. The speaker created this philosophy Better Than. It is new, so i don't believe it would be widely referenced except on the fellowship of fortuna site which i liked to. i received the essay (unpublished) from the source himself. what do you suggest here? i think it is an important philosophy and the background, i believe is important too.


[edit] Islamic Extremist Terrorism

I wonder do you even check the integrity of the sources which are being refered in the above mentioned article? In the category of Further Reading, where does this highly controversial person comes called Rober Spencer? I know you will not agree. But just look at the wiki article jihad and look at the contents of jihad watch website. Consider my references to be my arguments (please). Have a look at this video and tell me whats wrong here? how is this media totally unreliable. The same thing is applied to jihad watch by comparing to the wiki article Jihad.

My key point is, why dont you consider the integrity and controversy of the sources being refered?

Your arguments are welcomed. But I just want to make you see few references in comparison. VirtualEye 08:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:WarthogDemon

I was looking around and I saw you offered to nominate him for adminship. I've done the same thing.diff Great minds think alike, eh? When he feels ready to test his luck with going into the supply closet to get the mop and bucket, make sure you let me co-nominate him. Happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 18:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Short Articles

I'm trying to expand details on Old Newingtonians who are Olympians and medallists so I was listing their Olympic achivements and intended to add further biographical material but now I can't. How would you suggest i go about this.--Sbrandons 04:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Reposting

I thought thats what stubs are for? so people can expand the article. DarkCastle 04:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. DarkCastle 04:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Athepirate08

hi, i am kind of confused, I am new at this, but I just made a page for a church located in wylie, texas: Jesus Name Pentecostal Church The Refuge, and I was wondering why it was deleted. I really put a lot of work into it, and its a real church, and it was instantly deleted. please help or explain. thanks.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athepirate08 (talkcontribs) 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Been Thinking About A Page

I've asked an admin on this already and he was unsure but said "maybe" on it, so I'd like another admin's opinion. I'm considering making an article for a small ghost town in Colorado. Emphasis on small. I can't find it in an atlas. I've googled the town and most of the google hits are from the movie Red Dawn that was filmed there. I did find coordinates of the place and at least one or two places listing it as a mining town in the past. The town is Calumet, Colorado if you wish to do the search yourself. My question is, if I have the coordinates, list the source, note the movie, and find some reliable reference of it being a mining town it'll still be a stubby article. Would it be a notable article? -WarthogDemon 07:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spell for Chamelion (film) page

Why did you delete the Spell for Chamelion movie page I creaed? - Peregrinefisher 07:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to guess it's because you delete a bunch of bad pages, and mine was caught in the net somehow. If you're deleting so many you can't answer, I understand, otherwise reply here. - Peregrinefisher 08:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Alburnus Maior NGO

Hi. Thanks for patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism and erroneous new pages. I'm wondering if you could review your decision to delete my stub on the Alburnus Maior NGO. It's notable in terms of its successful advocacy for suspending the Rosia Montana mining project: a proposal to build the largest open-pit gold mine in Europe. Google search link -- 41,300 results.

Thanks Jackk 15:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Much Appreciated! Thanks for your time.

Jackk 16:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Considering Making Some Articles Into Redirects

The other day I decided to have the article Lynn Harless deleted, as I didn't have as much info on her as I though. (Originally I thought she was a band member, but after finding I was incorrect I had nothing more to say other than her managing of bands and her being Justin Timberlake's mom.) And now I'm wondering if I should change these four people into redirects:

I'm considering this because they seem to be two stubby. (However the other two members have more of a history than just being in Innosense.) Not sure if I should keep them as is or go along with that. Part of this is because of a nasty vandal incidence, so I'm a bit biased, so I'd like to know what you think. :) -WarthogDemon 02:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Or shouldn't I be asking? >_> Forgive me if that's the case. -WarthogDemon 00:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry 'bout that. I looked at a couple and they seemed to be of sufficient length. I usually take the single-sentence entries and convert them. - Lucky 6.9 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete my Louisa Swain article?

This was the 1st lady to vote in the USA after 1807.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by James possamai (talkcontribs) 16:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Renetto

Hi they are trying to delete the renetto article you reinstated. What is your take, is his reason even valid?

FrummerThanThou 17:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Girvin

I'm curious as to why the page on Tommy Girvin was deleted. Gringo300 21:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] information gathering

I'm working on gathering information on Tommy Girvin. I think i should probably provide some links as references, too. Gringo300 00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] That was a compliment, just not a very clear one

/* Jodi Foster voice */ Was that fast? That looked fast... Wow. - 152.91.9.144 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, that was oblique to the point of obfuscation... What I meant was you appear to have deleted that page within two seconds of my having tagged it for deletion. I was impressed with your alacrity, and the "Jodi Foster" thing was a quote from Maverick (film) with respect to a quick-draw gunslinger. So, umm, yeah... Keep up the good work. - 152.91.9.144 03:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Am I Asking Something I Shouldn't?

I asked for an opinion here: [10] and I'm wondering if you missed it or if I shouldn't be asking questions on talk pages like that. >_>; -WarthogDemon 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Seems one of them was just marked an AfD. I'll just see what happens to it and then consider the same actions for the other pages I mentioned. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Templates

Hi, Lucky 6.9. I know that you're too busy on vandal reverting, and deleting non-notable articles. Anyways, I just want you to explain how could I arrange my template boxes on my user page. In my opinion, most of wikipedian uses babel to arrange the templates on their user page. I know that some templates has been moved into other names, deleted, or some templates doesn't work on babels like such template User who is birthday is May 14, and favourite color is Blue. Could you please help me on this? I'm having trouble to arrange templates on my user page. Cheers! Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilogos

You might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 16:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Hello this is BobafettH23. On Kingalex56, on the link of; Why The @#$% I was banned, an ip address (82.7.125.98) vandalized that page by writing "fuck you", and erasing some stuff. Let me know when the matter has been taken of. Thanks. BobafettH23 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How long?

Did your retirement last? Brainhell 01:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Thank You!

Thank you very much for your contributions and your help in my quest to keep Wikipedia a Clean and Reliable source for Information. I've seen your name pop up quite often in the recent changes article and you've been deleting a lot of articles that I've been marking. I want to let you know your actions are not going unnoticed and I appreciate every little thing you do for the WikiCommunity. I thank you, and Beg you to have a great day. Take it easy, and If it's easy, take it twice!

  • No, Thank You!

I very much appreciate your contributions to wikipedia and admire your dedication to the site. I think it's great that you of all people are an Admin, because you uphold and defend all that is good in Wikipedia. I appreciate all your work and the fact that you even had time to respond to me. Though I am likely not a well enough established member of Wikipedia to award you a Barnstar, I most certainly will remember to do so later. I often do see your name pop up on the Recent changes log, and I smile every time I do, because I know someone is working just as hard as I am to keep Wikipedia a great public databank of credible, reliable information.

With Deep Respect and gratitude Carlo V. Sexron 02:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

P.s.

Though I haven't yet given you a barnstar, I can at least throw this back at you!

Thank You! You ARE appreciated!

Carlo V. Sexron 02:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

  • Honored

I thank you very much for your kind words and again taking time out of your day to communicate with me and respond to my message. I would be more than ecstatic to continue helping Wikipedia be a finer site than it already is. It's nice to know that someone is watching my work too! And I thank you for that! It makes every movement seem to go further and bit by bit, I like to think that we are both doing our parts for the community.

With Sincere Respect and Joy Carlo V. Sexron 03:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron


  • [[user:Flowerykewlstuffz123]]

Can you please do somethiing about this user? It seems like they've only created useless nonsense and is trying to defend two articles s/he made with No sources. Although I admit I did use the 'spam' tag on them, I think it was effective in getting the point through that they are basically articles that are going to get deleted anyway. He made a page for slang that NO ONE in the world uses, only his school, which should have been merged with his school anyway.

  • Thanks For the Encouragement

I'm sure you get a lot of that as an Admin, I think I really needed that because I thought there would be no Justice to that. Until my dreams come true and there is a Template:Db-crap tag, I guess db-vandalism and db-nonsense will have to fill the gap.

  • Keep Up the Good Work!

Hang in there, Wikipedia Loves you!

I appreciate all the hard work and effort you give to the Wikipedia Community!

Trying to relieve some stress and pressure, Carlo V. Sexron 11:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

[edit] Can You Help Me Out?

Someone whom I am fairly certain is a sockpuppet of User:MinervaSimpson and User:MrBullockx is back as User:Systemex. -WarthogDemon 02:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Not sure how it goes when listing Sockpuppets but I believe it should be a sockpuppet of MrBullockx (that was made first). -WarthogDemon 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Erm, sorry. One more thing. Should MinervaSimpson have the same message? It only says there that the user is simply blocked indefinite; no sock puppet message. Sorry bout that. ^_^; -WarthogDemon 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Faith

The choice is yours of course, but I find it slightly suspicious that he mentioned User:Wooty, the one who placed the sockpuppet block on User:MinervaSimpson. Oo -WarthogDemon 03:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smbat III

Hello may i ask why you deleted my article? Nareklm 03:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well i was still in the process of making it. Nareklm 03:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Well it was Smbat III, if you check the delete log i think its that. Nareklm 03:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you :-D Nareklm 03:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Lucky 6.9, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Lucky 6.9]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk | Contribs 04:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Both, as in adding the category and the userbox? You don't need to. Just putting the userbox automatically adds you to the category! James086Talk | Contribs 10:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Popark.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Popark.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] billy wright (american poet) article.

i created an entry for Billy Wright the poet who was featured in the recent issue of Words Dance and also has published his own works and it was immediately deleted. why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.158.103.247 (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Another barnstar for you Lucky 6.9!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Lucky 6.9, have this barnstar for all your hard work salting articles that are patent nonsense/recreated hoaxes/non-notable biographies etc., and for your anti-vandalism work! SunStar Nettalk 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Please can you delete, and then salt User:SunStar Net/Thisisapatentnonsensepage at my request?? Glad you like the barnstar! --SunStar Nettalk 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you please salt it for me. Keep the good work up new page patrolling.... see my NPP exploits at

User:SunStar Net/Pages I tagged for speedy deletion, and feel free to review me at Wikipedia:Editor review/SunStar Net 2.

Thanks, --SunStar Nettalk 00:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Norman Window Page

You left a message to me about the Norman Window page i made and said: "Using sockpuppet accounts to repost nonsense is a blockable offense. Please do not attempt to do so again. Thank you. - Lucky 6.9 04:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)"

First of all, Im sorry if i was posting nonsense, I'll be sure to cite works and sources next time Second of all, i would just like to make it clear that i did not make a sockpuppet account, if you check your logs, you can see the IPs are different for the 2 posts and the my IP from this message will confirm i did not write the article the second time, only the first time. Thanks

[edit] Systemex

He's just put up a controversial article as a Featured Candidate. (Just like MrBullockx. Might want to have checkuser for all 3.) The article is here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/New antisemitism. -WarthogDemon 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know I've reblocked Systemex following confirmation he was a sockpuppet. the wub "?!" 23:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Optigan35011.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Optigan35011.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas M. North

He is a real person worthy of a page. If you have a valid reason for repeatedly deleting it, please give it to me rather than constantly removing what I post. kthanksbye Nbruschi 02:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


Sorry about the reverts, I did not see what you wrote on my page until just now. Now that there is an article page I will work on expanding it. Thanks for your help and sorry for the trouble. Nbruschi 02:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


sorry again for the confusion. Nbruschi 03:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] From Rhthpr

so why can't that sentence be the start of an article? Other people who are knowledgable or currently researching can add to it Rhthpr

One more thing... you or your bot deleted my first question on your talk page, so why can't I blank out my own talk page? Rhthpr 08:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm no bot... -WarthogDemon 08:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not A Problem Helping Out

FYI, one evening I had the idea to check your logs for any articles that get recreated, and retag them. I was pratically editing non-stop for about 20 minutes. Needless to say, I have a small idea of the chaos you have to deal with. Continue with the good work as well! *Salutes.* :) -WarthogDemon 08:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dominic Janes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dominic Janes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Generally, I hod noticed that it was deleted and protected and figured that I should find a suitable article or stub to go in its place. Cheers! ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 18:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] My Kung-Fu Sweetheart (film)

I was just checking and tidying a new article, when I found upon saving that you'd deleted it without explanation. I've recreated it pending some sort of reason. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

But it didn't lack content; it said that it was a film made in Hong Kong, gave its year of production, the director, the cast, a link to IMDb, and a stub. You deleted it within five minutes of its initial created; as the criteria for speedy deleteion advise, contributors should be given time (and, for courtesy's sake, a message of explanation). It's not as is it was clearly added in bad faith. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
You not only deleted the original article far too hastily, you then deleted my edited recreation without contacting me. The former is discourtesy towards the original contributor, and a great way to put people off from contributing; the latter was discourtesy towards me. Deleting my messages from your Talk page isn't a good sign either. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, and I should calm down too. But the lack of one sort of content isn't a complete lack of content, and certainly doesn't qualify under the meaning of the Act. It worries me that people are adding articles in good faith, only to see them disappear with no explanation; it's not good for Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; sorry not to have replied immediately — I realised that I was tired and ired, and needed to go to bed. I'll keep an eye on the article, as well as doing a little digging myself. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan wang

It appears as if you wanted to salt this page. You forgot to protect it. --- RockMFR 00:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo

I believe you've deleted this article: Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo and it came up again last night. The creator has made other contributions that do not appear to be copyvios, and this person has told me that this isn't a copyvio and has even expanded it after I suggested he/she do so. I'm assuming good faith in that he's not copying anymore; I can't seem to find that it is a copyvio, but I'd just like to check with you. -WarthogDemon 01:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You stated I shouldn't post advertising to Wikipedia.

Can you elaborate on that for me? What did I do that was advertising? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsmallz (talkcontribs) 02:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays


Merry Christmas, Lucky! Wishing you all the best and lots of happiness. I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. SWAdair | Talk 04:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sparisi1122

I shortened your block on User:Sparisi1122 because when I checked, I found a number of good contributions from this user. It is clear that the user was vandalising and so a block was definitely called for. It is not my intention to wheel-war with you, however. If you feel my actions were inappropriate, please discuss this with me on my user discussion page. Thanks, have a good day. --Yamla 16:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Mediation has been requested regarding your edits; the case is Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page. I just signed up as a mediator - would you accept me? Thanks, — Sebastian 21:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply on my talk page. I would like to see your statement on the mediation page. You are free to write it on the talk page, or, if you accept me as the mediator, I can work it into the "What's going on?" section. If you would rather have a different mediator, please let me know (per wiki or email) so we can find someone else. Thank you for your cooperation. — Sebastian 01:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting complaint

I see you deleted a complaint I made about deleting an article. Why was this? deleting complaints makes you look sensitive. Don't you like being questioned? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Totnesmartin (talkcontribs) 23:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep blocking vandalism accounts! I'm awarding you a Barnstar for your good work! HyperSonicBoom 01:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WoWWiki

Did you just edit the WoWWiki? --69.142.120.32 01:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You did not go to WoWWiki.com on Dec 13, register the name Lucky 6.9, and ask to become an admin? --69.142.120.32 01:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
This is the relevant link: http://www.wowwiki.com/User:Lucky_6.9 Kirkburn 01:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. That's cleared that up at least :) Kirkburn 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I Am So Confused . . .

I did have suspicions about that Case about your talk page, but thought it too immediate to just report it as a troll, so I decided to see if I should add my commentary there. I see it's been deleted and the user blocked. What exactly is going on? Oo -WarthogDemon 01:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. Sorry about that. Wished I decided to take action sooner. : / -WarthogDemon 01:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I don't know what's going on; whether it's a joke; or whether Lucky is completely out-of-control... but, I do NOT appreciate being asked to contribute comments to something that, to me, DID indeed seem legitimate, then have my comments ERASED from the ether by the very person who is the target of the complaint. You didn't even comment to me what was going on, Lucky. I think you should be blocked for a month, so that you can begin to understand that you are trampling on the time and energy of dedicated, innocent volunteers. --JossBuckle Swami 02:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I see nobody has bothered to let you know ...

You're being talked about. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry about it. I get these attacks weekly and tend to just ignore them. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You should know that if you're mentioned on a Mediation page and refuse mediation, it just closes? You didn't need to delete it, just say you refuse, and it's all over. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Ask for further opinions on the admin page, see what conensus is. If they see undelete it, then go ahead and do it, and just say you refuse mediation. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Way back when...

You once stated that you went to Club 33. May I inquire as to how you got in? Are you a member, or did a member allow you the privilege? Just curious. Gracias. --Ali'i 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. It sounds like you had a great time. Next time I'm in California, I plan on being there. Might I add that you seem like a nice, genuine person... unlike many here at WP, no offense. Keep up the good work. I've heard Kerry is a great person from others as well. Now I just have to learn to play the harpsichord and I'll be set. Mahalo. --Ali'i 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] William Sledd

William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Vandal Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Here's another barnstar for you for all of your newpage vandal watching. Diez2 03:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Well Welcome Back!

Hope you liked your break. :) Hope I've kept your talk page sane; these past few days have been odd. oO -WarthogDemon 06:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Safiyya bint Huyayy

Thanks Lucky, (i had a name change) I'm in talks with him, hope to restore it soon. In the meantime can I request your input to the Safiyya bint Huyayy article. Please read the talk page on the current edit war issue. Safiyya was a jewish girl who was taken by Mohammad as a concubine. You can read the article and it tells you the story in all the bloody detail black on white, yet when I put on the lead paragraph that she was a concubine it was reverted by another editor a number of times, and this has gone on. Please comment on the talk page there. FrummerThanThou 07:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] El-Manial

I don't get it.. why redirect the El-Manial article to Cairo? --Ahmed 07:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Ahh... I guess the Districts of Cairo template will need some work. --Ahmed 07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Serbius

The send me a link to where i can post a 'personal message' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OllieQueen (talkcontribs) 19:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Thanks for the help. Is there any way to make the title of the new article Serbius though? (Rather than User: OllieQueen)


[edit] kismetologist

sorry, i'm confused. i am trying to request a deletion review for better than. can't figure out why you deleted it in the first place though, it's a contemporary philosophical principle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kismetologist (talkcontribs) 19:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

lucky...i got the information and the essay from the philosophical source...ie 'messenger' or speaker for the movement The Fellowship of Fortuna. The speaker created this philosophy Better Than. It is new, so i don't believe it would be widely referenced except on the fellowship of fortuna site which i liked to. i received the essay (unpublished) from the source himself. what do you suggest here? i think it is an important philosophy and the background, i believe is important too.


[edit] Islamic Extremist Terrorism

I wonder do you even check the integrity of the sources which are being refered in the above mentioned article? In the category of Further Reading, where does this highly controversial person comes called Rober Spencer? I know you will not agree. But just look at the wiki article jihad and look at the contents of jihad watch website. Consider my references to be my arguments (please). Have a look at this video and tell me whats wrong here? how is this media totally unreliable. The same thing is applied to jihad watch by comparing to the wiki article Jihad.

My key point is, why dont you consider the integrity and controversy of the sources being refered?

Your arguments are welcomed. But I just want to make you see few references in comparison. VirtualEye 08:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:WarthogDemon

I was looking around and I saw you offered to nominate him for adminship. I've done the same thing.diff Great minds think alike, eh? When he feels ready to test his luck with going into the supply closet to get the mop and bucket, make sure you let me co-nominate him. Happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 18:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Short Articles

I'm trying to expand details on Old Newingtonians who are Olympians and medallists so I was listing their Olympic achivements and intended to add further biographical material but now I can't. How would you suggest i go about this.--Sbrandons 04:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Reposting

I thought thats what stubs are for? so people can expand the article. DarkCastle 04:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. DarkCastle 04:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Athepirate08

hi, i am kind of confused, I am new at this, but I just made a page for a church located in wylie, texas: Jesus Name Pentecostal Church The Refuge, and I was wondering why it was deleted. I really put a lot of work into it, and its a real church, and it was instantly deleted. please help or explain. thanks.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athepirate08 (talkcontribs) 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Been Thinking About A Page

I've asked an admin on this already and he was unsure but said "maybe" on it, so I'd like another admin's opinion. I'm considering making an article for a small ghost town in Colorado. Emphasis on small. I can't find it in an atlas. I've googled the town and most of the google hits are from the movie Red Dawn that was filmed there. I did find coordinates of the place and at least one or two places listing it as a mining town in the past. The town is Calumet, Colorado if you wish to do the search yourself. My question is, if I have the coordinates, list the source, note the movie, and find some reliable reference of it being a mining town it'll still be a stubby article. Would it be a notable article? -WarthogDemon 07:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spell for Chamelion (film) page

Why did you delete the Spell for Chamelion movie page I creaed? - Peregrinefisher 07:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to guess it's because you delete a bunch of bad pages, and mine was caught in the net somehow. If you're deleting so many you can't answer, I understand, otherwise reply here. - Peregrinefisher 08:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Alburnus Maior NGO

Hi. Thanks for patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism and erroneous new pages. I'm wondering if you could review your decision to delete my stub on the Alburnus Maior NGO. It's notable in terms of its successful advocacy for suspending the Rosia Montana mining project: a proposal to build the largest open-pit gold mine in Europe. Google search link -- 41,300 results.

Thanks Jackk 15:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Much Appreciated! Thanks for your time.

Jackk 16:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Considering Making Some Articles Into Redirects

The other day I decided to have the article Lynn Harless deleted, as I didn't have as much info on her as I though. (Originally I thought she was a band member, but after finding I was incorrect I had nothing more to say other than her managing of bands and her being Justin Timberlake's mom.) And now I'm wondering if I should change these four people into redirects:

I'm considering this because they seem to be two stubby. (However the other two members have more of a history than just being in Innosense.) Not sure if I should keep them as is or go along with that. Part of this is because of a nasty vandal incidence, so I'm a bit biased, so I'd like to know what you think. :) -WarthogDemon 02:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Or shouldn't I be asking? >_> Forgive me if that's the case. -WarthogDemon 00:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry 'bout that. I looked at a couple and they seemed to be of sufficient length. I usually take the single-sentence entries and convert them. - Lucky 6.9 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete my Louisa Swain article?

This was the 1st lady to vote in the USA after 1807.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by James possamai (talkcontribs) 16:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Renetto

Hi they are trying to delete the renetto article you reinstated. What is your take, is his reason even valid?

FrummerThanThou 17:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Girvin

I'm curious as to why the page on Tommy Girvin was deleted. Gringo300 21:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] information gathering

I'm working on gathering information on Tommy Girvin. I think i should probably provide some links as references, too. Gringo300 00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] That was a compliment, just not a very clear one

/* Jodi Foster voice */ Was that fast? That looked fast... Wow. - 152.91.9.144 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, that was oblique to the point of obfuscation... What I meant was you appear to have deleted that page within two seconds of my having tagged it for deletion. I was impressed with your alacrity, and the "Jodi Foster" thing was a quote from Maverick (film) with respect to a quick-draw gunslinger. So, umm, yeah... Keep up the good work. - 152.91.9.144 03:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Am I Asking Something I Shouldn't?

I asked for an opinion here: [11] and I'm wondering if you missed it or if I shouldn't be asking questions on talk pages like that. >_>; -WarthogDemon 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Seems one of them was just marked an AfD. I'll just see what happens to it and then consider the same actions for the other pages I mentioned. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Templates

Hi, Lucky 6.9. I know that you're too busy on vandal reverting, and deleting non-notable articles. Anyways, I just want you to explain how could I arrange my template boxes on my user page. In my opinion, most of wikipedian uses babel to arrange the templates on their user page. I know that some templates has been moved into other names, deleted, or some templates doesn't work on babels like such template User who is birthday is May 14, and favourite color is Blue. Could you please help me on this? I'm having trouble to arrange templates on my user page. Cheers! Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilogos

You might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 16:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Hello this is BobafettH23. On Kingalex56, on the link of; Why The @#$% I was banned, an ip address (82.7.125.98) vandalized that page by writing "fuck you", and erasing some stuff. Let me know when the matter has been taken of. Thanks. BobafettH23 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How long?

Did your retirement last? Brainhell 01:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Thank You!

Thank you very much for your contributions and your help in my quest to keep Wikipedia a Clean and Reliable source for Information. I've seen your name pop up quite often in the recent changes article and you've been deleting a lot of articles that I've been marking. I want to let you know your actions are not going unnoticed and I appreciate every little thing you do for the WikiCommunity. I thank you, and Beg you to have a great day. Take it easy, and If it's easy, take it twice!

  • No, Thank You!

I very much appreciate your contributions to wikipedia and admire your dedication to the site. I think it's great that you of all people are an Admin, because you uphold and defend all that is good in Wikipedia. I appreciate all your work and the fact that you even had time to respond to me. Though I am likely not a well enough established member of Wikipedia to award you a Barnstar, I most certainly will remember to do so later. I often do see your name pop up on the Recent changes log, and I smile every time I do, because I know someone is working just as hard as I am to keep Wikipedia a great public databank of credible, reliable information.

With Deep Respect and gratitude Carlo V. Sexron 02:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

P.s.

Though I haven't yet given you a barnstar, I can at least throw this back at you!

Thank You! You ARE appreciated!

Carlo V. Sexron 02:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

  • Honored

I thank you very much for your kind words and again taking time out of your day to communicate with me and respond to my message. I would be more than ecstatic to continue helping Wikipedia be a finer site than it already is. It's nice to know that someone is watching my work too! And I thank you for that! It makes every movement seem to go further and bit by bit, I like to think that we are both doing our parts for the community.

With Sincere Respect and Joy Carlo V. Sexron 03:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron


  • [[user:Flowerykewlstuffz123]]

Can you please do somethiing about this user? It seems like they've only created useless nonsense and is trying to defend two articles s/he made with No sources. Although I admit I did use the 'spam' tag on them, I think it was effective in getting the point through that they are basically articles that are going to get deleted anyway. He made a page for slang that NO ONE in the world uses, only his school, which should have been merged with his school anyway.

  • Thanks For the Encouragement

I'm sure you get a lot of that as an Admin, I think I really needed that because I thought there would be no Justice to that. Until my dreams come true and there is a Template:Db-crap tag, I guess db-vandalism and db-nonsense will have to fill the gap.

  • Keep Up the Good Work!

Hang in there, Wikipedia Loves you!

I appreciate all the hard work and effort you give to the Wikipedia Community!

Trying to relieve some stress and pressure, Carlo V. Sexron 11:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

[edit] Can You Help Me Out?

Someone whom I am fairly certain is a sockpuppet of User:MinervaSimpson and User:MrBullockx is back as User:Systemex. -WarthogDemon 02:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Not sure how it goes when listing Sockpuppets but I believe it should be a sockpuppet of MrBullockx (that was made first). -WarthogDemon 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Erm, sorry. One more thing. Should MinervaSimpson have the same message? It only says there that the user is simply blocked indefinite; no sock puppet message. Sorry bout that. ^_^; -WarthogDemon 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Faith

The choice is yours of course, but I find it slightly suspicious that he mentioned User:Wooty, the one who placed the sockpuppet block on User:MinervaSimpson. Oo -WarthogDemon 03:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smbat III

Hello may i ask why you deleted my article? Nareklm 03:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well i was still in the process of making it. Nareklm 03:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Well it was Smbat III, if you check the delete log i think its that. Nareklm 03:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you :-D Nareklm 03:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Lucky 6.9, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Lucky 6.9]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk | Contribs 04:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Both, as in adding the category and the userbox? You don't need to. Just putting the userbox automatically adds you to the category! James086Talk | Contribs 10:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Popark.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Popark.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] billy wright (american poet) article.

i created an entry for Billy Wright the poet who was featured in the recent issue of Words Dance and also has published his own works and it was immediately deleted. why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.158.103.247 (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Another barnstar for you Lucky 6.9!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Lucky 6.9, have this barnstar for all your hard work salting articles that are patent nonsense/recreated hoaxes/non-notable biographies etc., and for your anti-vandalism work! SunStar Nettalk 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Please can you delete, and then salt User:SunStar Net/Thisisapatentnonsensepage at my request?? Glad you like the barnstar! --SunStar Nettalk 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you please salt it for me. Keep the good work up new page patrolling.... see my NPP exploits at

User:SunStar Net/Pages I tagged for speedy deletion, and feel free to review me at Wikipedia:Editor review/SunStar Net 2.

Thanks, --SunStar Nettalk 00:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Norman Window Page

You left a message to me about the Norman Window page i made and said: "Using sockpuppet accounts to repost nonsense is a blockable offense. Please do not attempt to do so again. Thank you. - Lucky 6.9 04:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)"

First of all, Im sorry if i was posting nonsense, I'll be sure to cite works and sources next time Second of all, i would just like to make it clear that i did not make a sockpuppet account, if you check your logs, you can see the IPs are different for the 2 posts and the my IP from this message will confirm i did not write the article the second time, only the first time. Thanks

[edit] Systemex

He's just put up a controversial article as a Featured Candidate. (Just like MrBullockx. Might want to have checkuser for all 3.) The article is here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/New antisemitism. -WarthogDemon 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know I've reblocked Systemex following confirmation he was a sockpuppet. the wub "?!" 23:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Optigan35011.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Optigan35011.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas M. North

He is a real person worthy of a page. If you have a valid reason for repeatedly deleting it, please give it to me rather than constantly removing what I post. kthanksbye Nbruschi 02:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


Sorry about the reverts, I did not see what you wrote on my page until just now. Now that there is an article page I will work on expanding it. Thanks for your help and sorry for the trouble. Nbruschi 02:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


sorry again for the confusion. Nbruschi 03:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] From Rhthpr

so why can't that sentence be the start of an article? Other people who are knowledgable or currently researching can add to it Rhthpr

One more thing... you or your bot deleted my first question on your talk page, so why can't I blank out my own talk page? Rhthpr 08:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm no bot... -WarthogDemon 08:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not A Problem Helping Out

FYI, one evening I had the idea to check your logs for any articles that get recreated, and retag them. I was pratically editing non-stop for about 20 minutes. Needless to say, I have a small idea of the chaos you have to deal with. Continue with the good work as well! *Salutes.* :) -WarthogDemon 08:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dominic Janes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dominic Janes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Generally, I hod noticed that it was deleted and protected and figured that I should find a suitable article or stub to go in its place. Cheers! ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 18:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] My Kung-Fu Sweetheart (film)

I was just checking and tidying a new article, when I found upon saving that you'd deleted it without explanation. I've recreated it pending some sort of reason. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

But it didn't lack content; it said that it was a film made in Hong Kong, gave its year of production, the director, the cast, a link to IMDb, and a stub. You deleted it within five minutes of its initial created; as the criteria for speedy deleteion advise, contributors should be given time (and, for courtesy's sake, a message of explanation). It's not as is it was clearly added in bad faith. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
You not only deleted the original article far too hastily, you then deleted my edited recreation without contacting me. The former is discourtesy towards the original contributor, and a great way to put people off from contributing; the latter was discourtesy towards me. Deleting my messages from your Talk page isn't a good sign either. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, and I should calm down too. But the lack of one sort of content isn't a complete lack of content, and certainly doesn't qualify under the meaning of the Act. It worries me that people are adding articles in good faith, only to see them disappear with no explanation; it's not good for Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; sorry not to have replied immediately — I realised that I was tired and ired, and needed to go to bed. I'll keep an eye on the article, as well as doing a little digging myself. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan wang

It appears as if you wanted to salt this page. You forgot to protect it. --- RockMFR 00:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo

I believe you've deleted this article: Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo and it came up again last night. The creator has made other contributions that do not appear to be copyvios, and this person has told me that this isn't a copyvio and has even expanded it after I suggested he/she do so. I'm assuming good faith in that he's not copying anymore; I can't seem to find that it is a copyvio, but I'd just like to check with you. -WarthogDemon 01:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You stated I shouldn't post advertising to Wikipedia.

Can you elaborate on that for me? What did I do that was advertising? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsmallz (talkcontribs) 02:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays


Merry Christmas, Lucky! Wishing you all the best and lots of happiness. I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. SWAdair | Talk 04:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sparisi1122

I shortened your block on User:Sparisi1122 because when I checked, I found a number of good contributions from this user. It is clear that the user was vandalising and so a block was definitely called for. It is not my intention to wheel-war with you, however. If you feel my actions were inappropriate, please discuss this with me on my user discussion page. Thanks, have a good day. --Yamla 16:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Mediation has been requested regarding your edits; the case is Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page. I just signed up as a mediator - would you accept me? Thanks, — Sebastian 21:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply on my talk page. I would like to see your statement on the mediation page. You are free to write it on the talk page, or, if you accept me as the mediator, I can work it into the "What's going on?" section. If you would rather have a different mediator, please let me know (per wiki or email) so we can find someone else. Thank you for your cooperation. — Sebastian 01:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting complaint

I see you deleted a complaint I made about deleting an article. Why was this? deleting complaints makes you look sensitive. Don't you like being questioned? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Totnesmartin (talkcontribs) 23:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep blocking vandalism accounts! I'm awarding you a Barnstar for your good work! HyperSonicBoom 01:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WoWWiki

Did you just edit the WoWWiki? --69.142.120.32 01:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You did not go to WoWWiki.com on Dec 13, register the name Lucky 6.9, and ask to become an admin? --69.142.120.32 01:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
This is the relevant link: http://www.wowwiki.com/User:Lucky_6.9 Kirkburn 01:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. That's cleared that up at least :) Kirkburn 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I Am So Confused . . .

I did have suspicions about that Case about your talk page, but thought it too immediate to just report it as a troll, so I decided to see if I should add my commentary there. I see it's been deleted and the user blocked. What exactly is going on? Oo -WarthogDemon 01:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. Sorry about that. Wished I decided to take action sooner. : / -WarthogDemon 01:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I don't know what's going on; whether it's a joke; or whether Lucky is completely out-of-control... but, I do NOT appreciate being asked to contribute comments to something that, to me, DID indeed seem legitimate, then have my comments ERASED from the ether by the very person who is the target of the complaint. You didn't even comment to me what was going on, Lucky. I think you should be blocked for a month, so that you can begin to understand that you are trampling on the time and energy of dedicated, innocent volunteers. --JossBuckle Swami 02:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I see nobody has bothered to let you know ...

You're being talked about. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry about it. I get these attacks weekly and tend to just ignore them. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You should know that if you're mentioned on a Mediation page and refuse mediation, it just closes? You didn't need to delete it, just say you refuse, and it's all over. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Ask for further opinions on the admin page, see what conensus is. If they see undelete it, then go ahead and do it, and just say you refuse mediation. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Way back when...

You once stated that you went to Club 33. May I inquire as to how you got in? Are you a member, or did a member allow you the privilege? Just curious. Gracias. --Ali'i 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. It sounds like you had a great time. Next time I'm in California, I plan on being there. Might I add that you seem like a nice, genuine person... unlike many here at WP, no offense. Keep up the good work. I've heard Kerry is a great person from others as well. Now I just have to learn to play the harpsichord and I'll be set. Mahalo. --Ali'i 19:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] William Sledd

William has been featured in a number of news articles. Please can you unprotect the page, I think it is time. Thanks. FrummerThanThou 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Vandal Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Here's another barnstar for you for all of your newpage vandal watching. Diez2 03:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Well Welcome Back!

Hope you liked your break. :) Hope I've kept your talk page sane; these past few days have been odd. oO -WarthogDemon 06:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Safiyya bint Huyayy

Thanks Lucky, (i had a name change) I'm in talks with him, hope to restore it soon. In the meantime can I request your input to the Safiyya bint Huyayy article. Please read the talk page on the current edit war issue. Safiyya was a jewish girl who was taken by Mohammad as a concubine. You can read the article and it tells you the story in all the bloody detail black on white, yet when I put on the lead paragraph that she was a concubine it was reverted by another editor a number of times, and this has gone on. Please comment on the talk page there. FrummerThanThou 07:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] El-Manial

I don't get it.. why redirect the El-Manial article to Cairo? --Ahmed 07:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Ahh... I guess the Districts of Cairo template will need some work. --Ahmed 07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Serbius

The send me a link to where i can post a 'personal message' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OllieQueen (talkcontribs) 19:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Thanks for the help. Is there any way to make the title of the new article Serbius though? (Rather than User: OllieQueen)


[edit] kismetologist

sorry, i'm confused. i am trying to request a deletion review for better than. can't figure out why you deleted it in the first place though, it's a contemporary philosophical principle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kismetologist (talkcontribs) 19:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

lucky...i got the information and the essay from the philosophical source...ie 'messenger' or speaker for the movement The Fellowship of Fortuna. The speaker created this philosophy Better Than. It is new, so i don't believe it would be widely referenced except on the fellowship of fortuna site which i liked to. i received the essay (unpublished) from the source himself. what do you suggest here? i think it is an important philosophy and the background, i believe is important too.


[edit] Islamic Extremist Terrorism

I wonder do you even check the integrity of the sources which are being refered in the above mentioned article? In the category of Further Reading, where does this highly controversial person comes called Rober Spencer? I know you will not agree. But just look at the wiki article jihad and look at the contents of jihad watch website. Consider my references to be my arguments (please). Have a look at this video and tell me whats wrong here? how is this media totally unreliable. The same thing is applied to jihad watch by comparing to the wiki article Jihad.

My key point is, why dont you consider the integrity and controversy of the sources being refered?

Your arguments are welcomed. But I just want to make you see few references in comparison. VirtualEye 08:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:WarthogDemon

I was looking around and I saw you offered to nominate him for adminship. I've done the same thing.diff Great minds think alike, eh? When he feels ready to test his luck with going into the supply closet to get the mop and bucket, make sure you let me co-nominate him. Happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 18:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Short Articles

I'm trying to expand details on Old Newingtonians who are Olympians and medallists so I was listing their Olympic achivements and intended to add further biographical material but now I can't. How would you suggest i go about this.--Sbrandons 04:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Reposting

I thought thats what stubs are for? so people can expand the article. DarkCastle 04:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Cheers. DarkCastle 04:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Athepirate08

hi, i am kind of confused, I am new at this, but I just made a page for a church located in wylie, texas: Jesus Name Pentecostal Church The Refuge, and I was wondering why it was deleted. I really put a lot of work into it, and its a real church, and it was instantly deleted. please help or explain. thanks.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athepirate08 (talkcontribs) 05:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Been Thinking About A Page

I've asked an admin on this already and he was unsure but said "maybe" on it, so I'd like another admin's opinion. I'm considering making an article for a small ghost town in Colorado. Emphasis on small. I can't find it in an atlas. I've googled the town and most of the google hits are from the movie Red Dawn that was filmed there. I did find coordinates of the place and at least one or two places listing it as a mining town in the past. The town is Calumet, Colorado if you wish to do the search yourself. My question is, if I have the coordinates, list the source, note the movie, and find some reliable reference of it being a mining town it'll still be a stubby article. Would it be a notable article? -WarthogDemon 07:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spell for Chamelion (film) page

Why did you delete the Spell for Chamelion movie page I creaed? - Peregrinefisher 07:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to guess it's because you delete a bunch of bad pages, and mine was caught in the net somehow. If you're deleting so many you can't answer, I understand, otherwise reply here. - Peregrinefisher 08:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Alburnus Maior NGO

Hi. Thanks for patrolling Wikipedia for vandalism and erroneous new pages. I'm wondering if you could review your decision to delete my stub on the Alburnus Maior NGO. It's notable in terms of its successful advocacy for suspending the Rosia Montana mining project: a proposal to build the largest open-pit gold mine in Europe. Google search link -- 41,300 results.

Thanks Jackk 15:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Much Appreciated! Thanks for your time.

Jackk 16:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Considering Making Some Articles Into Redirects

The other day I decided to have the article Lynn Harless deleted, as I didn't have as much info on her as I though. (Originally I thought she was a band member, but after finding I was incorrect I had nothing more to say other than her managing of bands and her being Justin Timberlake's mom.) And now I'm wondering if I should change these four people into redirects:

I'm considering this because they seem to be two stubby. (However the other two members have more of a history than just being in Innosense.) Not sure if I should keep them as is or go along with that. Part of this is because of a nasty vandal incidence, so I'm a bit biased, so I'd like to know what you think. :) -WarthogDemon 02:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Or shouldn't I be asking? >_> Forgive me if that's the case. -WarthogDemon 00:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Oops. Sorry 'bout that. I looked at a couple and they seemed to be of sufficient length. I usually take the single-sentence entries and convert them. - Lucky 6.9 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete my Louisa Swain article?

This was the 1st lady to vote in the USA after 1807.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by James possamai (talkcontribs) 16:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Renetto

Hi they are trying to delete the renetto article you reinstated. What is your take, is his reason even valid?

FrummerThanThou 17:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Girvin

I'm curious as to why the page on Tommy Girvin was deleted. Gringo300 21:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] information gathering

I'm working on gathering information on Tommy Girvin. I think i should probably provide some links as references, too. Gringo300 00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] That was a compliment, just not a very clear one

/* Jodi Foster voice */ Was that fast? That looked fast... Wow. - 152.91.9.144 03:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, that was oblique to the point of obfuscation... What I meant was you appear to have deleted that page within two seconds of my having tagged it for deletion. I was impressed with your alacrity, and the "Jodi Foster" thing was a quote from Maverick (film) with respect to a quick-draw gunslinger. So, umm, yeah... Keep up the good work. - 152.91.9.144 03:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Am I Asking Something I Shouldn't?

I asked for an opinion here: [12] and I'm wondering if you missed it or if I shouldn't be asking questions on talk pages like that. >_>; -WarthogDemon 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Seems one of them was just marked an AfD. I'll just see what happens to it and then consider the same actions for the other pages I mentioned. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Templates

Hi, Lucky 6.9. I know that you're too busy on vandal reverting, and deleting non-notable articles. Anyways, I just want you to explain how could I arrange my template boxes on my user page. In my opinion, most of wikipedian uses babel to arrange the templates on their user page. I know that some templates has been moved into other names, deleted, or some templates doesn't work on babels like such template User who is birthday is May 14, and favourite color is Blue. Could you please help me on this? I'm having trouble to arrange templates on my user page. Cheers! Daniel5127 <Talk> 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilogos

You might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PKZ1200-450.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 16:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Hello this is BobafettH23. On Kingalex56, on the link of; Why The @#$% I was banned, an ip address (82.7.125.98) vandalized that page by writing "fuck you", and erasing some stuff. Let me know when the matter has been taken of. Thanks. BobafettH23 23:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] How long?

Did your retirement last? Brainhell 01:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Thank You!

Thank you very much for your contributions and your help in my quest to keep Wikipedia a Clean and Reliable source for Information. I've seen your name pop up quite often in the recent changes article and you've been deleting a lot of articles that I've been marking. I want to let you know your actions are not going unnoticed and I appreciate every little thing you do for the WikiCommunity. I thank you, and Beg you to have a great day. Take it easy, and If it's easy, take it twice!

  • No, Thank You!

I very much appreciate your contributions to wikipedia and admire your dedication to the site. I think it's great that you of all people are an Admin, because you uphold and defend all that is good in Wikipedia. I appreciate all your work and the fact that you even had time to respond to me. Though I am likely not a well enough established member of Wikipedia to award you a Barnstar, I most certainly will remember to do so later. I often do see your name pop up on the Recent changes log, and I smile every time I do, because I know someone is working just as hard as I am to keep Wikipedia a great public databank of credible, reliable information.

With Deep Respect and gratitude Carlo V. Sexron 02:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

P.s.

Though I haven't yet given you a barnstar, I can at least throw this back at you!

Thank You! You ARE appreciated!

Carlo V. Sexron 02:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

  • Honored

I thank you very much for your kind words and again taking time out of your day to communicate with me and respond to my message. I would be more than ecstatic to continue helping Wikipedia be a finer site than it already is. It's nice to know that someone is watching my work too! And I thank you for that! It makes every movement seem to go further and bit by bit, I like to think that we are both doing our parts for the community.

With Sincere Respect and Joy Carlo V. Sexron 03:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron


  • [[user:Flowerykewlstuffz123]]

Can you please do somethiing about this user? It seems like they've only created useless nonsense and is trying to defend two articles s/he made with No sources. Although I admit I did use the 'spam' tag on them, I think it was effective in getting the point through that they are basically articles that are going to get deleted anyway. He made a page for slang that NO ONE in the world uses, only his school, which should have been merged with his school anyway.

  • Thanks For the Encouragement

I'm sure you get a lot of that as an Admin, I think I really needed that because I thought there would be no Justice to that. Until my dreams come true and there is a Template:Db-crap tag, I guess db-vandalism and db-nonsense will have to fill the gap.

  • Keep Up the Good Work!

Hang in there, Wikipedia Loves you!

I appreciate all the hard work and effort you give to the Wikipedia Community!

Trying to relieve some stress and pressure, Carlo V. Sexron 11:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Carlo V. Sexron

[edit] Can You Help Me Out?

Someone whom I am fairly certain is a sockpuppet of User:MinervaSimpson and User:MrBullockx is back as User:Systemex. -WarthogDemon 02:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Not sure how it goes when listing Sockpuppets but I believe it should be a sockpuppet of MrBullockx (that was made first). -WarthogDemon 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Erm, sorry. One more thing. Should MinervaSimpson have the same message? It only says there that the user is simply blocked indefinite; no sock puppet message. Sorry bout that. ^_^; -WarthogDemon 03:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Faith

The choice is yours of course, but I find it slightly suspicious that he mentioned User:Wooty, the one who placed the sockpuppet block on User:MinervaSimpson. Oo -WarthogDemon 03:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smbat III

Hello may i ask why you deleted my article? Nareklm 03:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well i was still in the process of making it. Nareklm 03:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Well it was Smbat III, if you check the delete log i think its that. Nareklm 03:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you :-D Nareklm 03:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Lucky 6.9, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Lucky 6.9]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk | Contribs 04:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Both, as in adding the category and the userbox? You don't need to. Just putting the userbox automatically adds you to the category! James086Talk | Contribs 10:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Popark.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Popark.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] billy wright (american poet) article.

i created an entry for Billy Wright the poet who was featured in the recent issue of Words Dance and also has published his own works and it was immediately deleted. why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.158.103.247 (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Another barnstar for you Lucky 6.9!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Lucky 6.9, have this barnstar for all your hard work salting articles that are patent nonsense/recreated hoaxes/non-notable biographies etc., and for your anti-vandalism work! SunStar Nettalk 00:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Please can you delete, and then salt User:SunStar Net/Thisisapatentnonsensepage at my request?? Glad you like the barnstar! --SunStar Nettalk 00:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you please salt it for me. Keep the good work up new page patrolling.... see my NPP exploits at

User:SunStar Net/Pages I tagged for speedy deletion, and feel free to review me at Wikipedia:Editor review/SunStar Net 2.

Thanks, --SunStar Nettalk 00:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Norman Window Page

You left a message to me about the Norman Window page i made and said: "Using sockpuppet accounts to repost nonsense is a blockable offense. Please do not attempt to do so again. Thank you. - Lucky 6.9 04:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)"

First of all, Im sorry if i was posting nonsense, I'll be sure to cite works and sources next time Second of all, i would just like to make it clear that i did not make a sockpuppet account, if you check your logs, you can see the IPs are different for the 2 posts and the my IP from this message will confirm i did not write the article the second time, only the first time. Thanks

[edit] Systemex

He's just put up a controversial article as a Featured Candidate. (Just like MrBullockx. Might want to have checkuser for all 3.) The article is here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/New antisemitism. -WarthogDemon 04:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know I've reblocked Systemex following confirmation he was a sockpuppet. the wub "?!" 23:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Optigan35011.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Optigan35011.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 16:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas M. North

He is a real person worthy of a page. If you have a valid reason for repeatedly deleting it, please give it to me rather than constantly removing what I post. kthanksbye Nbruschi 02:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


Sorry about the reverts, I did not see what you wrote on my page until just now. Now that there is an article page I will work on expanding it. Thanks for your help and sorry for the trouble. Nbruschi 02:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


sorry again for the confusion. Nbruschi 03:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] From Rhthpr

so why can't that sentence be the start of an article? Other people who are knowledgable or currently researching can add to it Rhthpr

One more thing... you or your bot deleted my first question on your talk page, so why can't I blank out my own talk page? Rhthpr 08:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm no bot... -WarthogDemon 08:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Not A Problem Helping Out

FYI, one evening I had the idea to check your logs for any articles that get recreated, and retag them. I was pratically editing non-stop for about 20 minutes. Needless to say, I have a small idea of the chaos you have to deal with. Continue with the good work as well! *Salutes.* :) -WarthogDemon 08:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dominic Janes

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Dominic Janes. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Generally, I hod noticed that it was deleted and protected and figured that I should find a suitable article or stub to go in its place. Cheers! ~ PHDrillSergeant...§ 18:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] My Kung-Fu Sweetheart (film)

I was just checking and tidying a new article, when I found upon saving that you'd deleted it without explanation. I've recreated it pending some sort of reason. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

But it didn't lack content; it said that it was a film made in Hong Kong, gave its year of production, the director, the cast, a link to IMDb, and a stub. You deleted it within five minutes of its initial created; as the criteria for speedy deleteion advise, contributors should be given time (and, for courtesy's sake, a message of explanation). It's not as is it was clearly added in bad faith. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
You not only deleted the original article far too hastily, you then deleted my edited recreation without contacting me. The former is discourtesy towards the original contributor, and a great way to put people off from contributing; the latter was discourtesy towards me. Deleting my messages from your Talk page isn't a good sign either. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, and I should calm down too. But the lack of one sort of content isn't a complete lack of content, and certainly doesn't qualify under the meaning of the Act. It worries me that people are adding articles in good faith, only to see them disappear with no explanation; it's not good for Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; sorry not to have replied immediately — I realised that I was tired and ired, and needed to go to bed. I'll keep an eye on the article, as well as doing a little digging myself. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan wang

It appears as if you wanted to salt this page. You forgot to protect it. --- RockMFR 00:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo

I believe you've deleted this article: Leven Thumps and the Gateway to Foo and it came up again last night. The creator has made other contributions that do not appear to be copyvios, and this person has told me that this isn't a copyvio and has even expanded it after I suggested he/she do so. I'm assuming good faith in that he's not copying anymore; I can't seem to find that it is a copyvio, but I'd just like to check with you. -WarthogDemon 01:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You stated I shouldn't post advertising to Wikipedia.

Can you elaborate on that for me? What did I do that was advertising? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jsmallz (talkcontribs) 02:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC).


[edit] Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays


Merry Christmas, Lucky! Wishing you all the best and lots of happiness. I hope you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. SWAdair | Talk 04:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sparisi1122

I shortened your block on User:Sparisi1122 because when I checked, I found a number of good contributions from this user. It is clear that the user was vandalising and so a block was definitely called for. It is not my intention to wheel-war with you, however. If you feel my actions were inappropriate, please discuss this with me on my user discussion page. Thanks, have a good day. --Yamla 16:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

Mediation has been requested regarding your edits; the case is Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page. I just signed up as a mediator - would you accept me? Thanks, — Sebastian 21:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply on my talk page. I would like to see your statement on the mediation page. You are free to write it on the talk page, or, if you accept me as the mediator, I can work it into the "What's going on?" section. If you would rather have a different mediator, please let me know (per wiki or email) so we can find someone else. Thank you for your cooperation. — Sebastian 01:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting complaint

I see you deleted a complaint I made about deleting an article. Why was this? deleting complaints makes you look sensitive. Don't you like being questioned? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Totnesmartin (talkcontribs) 23:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep blocking vandalism accounts! I'm awarding you a Barnstar for your good work! HyperSonicBoom 01:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WoWWiki

Did you just edit the WoWWiki? --69.142.120.32 01:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You did not go to WoWWiki.com on Dec 13, register the name Lucky 6.9, and ask to become an admin? --69.142.120.32 01:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
This is the relevant link: http://www.wowwiki.com/User:Lucky_6.9 Kirkburn 01:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. That's cleared that up at least :) Kirkburn 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I Am So Confused . . .

I did have suspicions about that Case about your talk page, but thought it too immediate to just report it as a troll, so I decided to see if I should add my commentary there. I see it's been deleted and the user blocked. What exactly is going on? Oo -WarthogDemon 01:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I see. Sorry about that. Wished I decided to take action sooner. : / -WarthogDemon 01:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I don't know what's going on; whether it's a joke; or whether Lucky is completely out-of-control... but, I do NOT appreciate being asked to contribute comments to something that, to me, DID indeed seem legitimate, then have my comments ERASED from the ether by the very person who is the target of the complaint. You didn't even comment to me what was going on, Lucky. I think you should be blocked for a month, so that you can begin to understand that you are trampling on the time and energy of dedicated, innocent volunteers. --JossBuckle Swami 02:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I see nobody has bothered to let you know ...

You're being talked about. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry about it. I get these attacks weekly and tend to just ignore them. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You should know that if you're mentioned on a Mediation page and refuse mediation, it just closes? You didn't need to delete it, just say you refuse, and it's all over. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Ask for further opinions on the admin page, see what conensus is. If they see undelete it, then go ahead and do it, and just say you refuse mediation. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)