|
This is a list of all the wierd stuff I have found on Wikipedia.
[edit] From TfD about Template:Trinidad and Tobago infobox.
- Ridiculously Strong Keep. This is insane. why not just speedy delete everything on wikipedia? before you blindly nominate random pages for deletion, try to check how many pages link to them, and if it's heavily used. That's why there's the "What Links Here" link on the side of the wikipedia page. This excessive and useless nomination of pages has to come to an end... I'm just waiting for someone to nominate Main page for deletion... User:Raccoon Fox - Talk 20:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment—Whhhhaaat are you talking about? Ridiculous to replace an out-of-date, single-use template with an up-to-date template that is the standard for over 195 other countries. As for "What Links Here" on the Template:Trinidad and Tobago infobox page...almost nothing. Except three pages dealing with its deletion and one user My contrib page. So either you meant to post your Ridiculously Strong Keep to some other template for deletion (like Template:User DTF) OR you really do mean it. To which I would say: at no point in your infinite ramblings did you come close to a rational thought. Everyone here is now dumber for having read it. —MJCdetroit 04:55, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] From IfD about a pornographic image.
- Hmmmm..... totally new concept...... Wikiporn! Our funding problems are over!Gzuckier 29 June 2005 03:40 (UTC)
I think this article speaks for itself. The joy of random page. - Lucky13pjn 04:37, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Ah, the evils of writing Wikipedia articles with the browser known as Marijuana 1.0. (Nonsense.) Geogre 03:16, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
- By sheer mind power, we can cause this article to disappear from Wikipedia. Grutness...wha? 14:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- By sheer telepathy (well, plus this bent spoon in my hand) I scratch that sector off the hard drive from afar. Master Thief Garrett 14:18, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: This article made me so angry that I accidentally knocked over a tree with my mind. Original research, Deep Thoughts. Geogre 18:50, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - Its a figment of imagination .--IncMan 20:40, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
"Maghook": 1000 G. "Lightsaber": 624,000 G. Realising it's non-notable fancruft? Priceless. There are some things writing five books can't buy, for everything else, there's Vfd. Master Thief Garrett 07:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. To ensure I am taken "seriously" by the author, I will refrain from using the word "fancruft" and use my newly coined term Fiction and Entertainment Compiled with Extreme Specificty. Affected millions, my ass. -R. fiend 22:36, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Haha. Maybe I will start using that term too.--Lucky13pjn 18:07, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Apologies, I thought it was obvious from my previous comments that I'm as likely to sprout wings and fly to the moon as I am to write detailed
fancruft articles on inconsequentialities unsuitable for an encyclopedia, even though I like the Culture novels very much indeed. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 15:21, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) deletia and insertions --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 19:51, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Could you please avoid the use of the term "fancruft"? Everyking 15:24, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Could you please avoid criticism of use of the term "fancruft"? ---Improv 15:31, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- From now on i decleare the term fancruft be reverted to fancrust 206.176.103.66 15:36, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Of course not. It is offensive to other users and demeans their work. Everyking 15:48, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Your criticism of the use of the term fancruft is offensive to me and demeans my work on VfD :) (sorry, in a silly mood) --Improv 03:32, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It is offensive to other users and demeans their work. -- Good. If their work is fancruft, it should be demeaned, pour encourager les autres. We're writing an encylopedia, not having a love-in. -- GWO
[edit] From the internet
Although not from wikipedia, I needed someplace to put this. You have gotta love it when someone sums up their entire site in their URL. --Lucky13pjn 03:47, Nov 23, 2004 (UTC)
www.bembridge.isle-of-wight.community-zzz-charity.jobs.onecarlosplace.co.uk
----------------------------
| NO LIFEGUARD ON DUTY |
| USE SANDBOX AT YOUR |
| OWN RISK |
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*************************************************************************************************
I am a fishcake
You should be served with Tartar sauce.
- !!!!!! First of all... you worship hitler if you think this should be deleted. While we're at it why don't we delete the article on Buddha? What's so notable about it? Expansion will come... it was just placed as a starting point. -- Unsigned by User:65.97.17.149
- I'm baffled beyond belief. And it seems that I worship Hitler. -- [[User:Bobdoe|BobDoe]] 07:38, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- ZEIG HEIL! VE MUST MERGE AND REDEERECT ZE MEDEECINAL MARIJUANA MAN! OOTEN EETEN HAUTEN GLOBEN! Lord Bob 08:03, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
hey, why did you just click that set of numbers? Don't you realize that the internet is connected to the WHOLE WORLD. You could accidentally set off some bad stuff... and that would be bad :O
Note: This is not me talking nor did I write this section. It is merely a copy/paste job.--Lucky13pjn 22:17, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
"NPOV" "fact" "opinion" "belief"
Dialog between me and Tom:
- Tom
- : God made the world in six days.
- me
- : That is your belief.
- Tom
- : No, that is a fact.
- me
- : It is your opinion that it is a fact.
- Tom
- : No, it is a plain fact, opinion is irrelevant.
- me
- : Well, in order not to offend those who believe differently, I will have to represent it as a belief or opinion.
- Tom
- : If you do that you will offend me.
- me
- : But I have to maintain a Neutral Point Of View.
- Tom
- : By all means: say that it is a fact that God made the world in six days, and there are some people who don't believe that fact.
- me
- : Supppose that I say that it is a fact that you assert that God made the world in six days.
- Tom
- : That implies that my assertion is just a matter of opinion.
- me
- : Well, that's my opinion.
- Tom
- : So your opinion trumps the facts.
- me
- : No matter what I say I am bound to offend someone.
- Tom
- : That is true, but a NPOV compels you to stick to the facts, and it is a fact that God made the world in six days.
- me
- : I think I see the problem. In order to maintain a NPOV I have either to represent all points of view as facts or as opinions or beliefs.
- Tom
- : That is certainly a solution. But, in either case I can't see what value your wiki can be. In the first case you will be inconsistent. In the second, all facts become irrelevant. Why would anyone be interested in reading either? You should just stick to the facts, and the fact is that God made the world in six days.
- me
- : Can you give me a reference?
- Tom
- : Surely. The book of Genesis.
- me
- : Aaaghk!
Never argue with a True Believer. 199.2.132.7 19:52, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
|
