Talk:Luciferians
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Luciferians is part of the WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines.
|
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| This article is supported by WikiProject Religion. This project provides a central approach to Religion-related subjects on wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| This article falls within the scope of the Left Hand Path work group. If you are interested in Left Hand Path-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. | ||
Luciferians is a term applied to two separate groups in opposition to the Roman Catholic Church
Historically this may have been correct, but there are still people who call themselves "Luciferians" that have nothing to do with Roman Catholicism per se.
The first was a schismatic group named after Lucifer, Bishop of Calaris (Cagliari in Sardinia) in the late 4th century. It is linked to the complex political machinations involving the emperor Constantius and Pope Liberius. Lucifer also had links with the Arian heresy. The movement died out early in the following century. For Orthdoxus's Dialogue against the Luciferians from circa the year 376 see http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3005.htm
Referring to Arians as a "heresy" is not a very NPOV. It was only heretical to people who disagreed with their theology, or Christology. The main "heretical" aspect of Arian doctrine (named after Arius) was that they were (literally) unitarians, ie. they denied the doctrine of the Trinity.
Various gnostic Luciferian sects have also been associated with the image of Lucifer, in the root sense of the bringer of light. The orthodox view is to associate Lucifer with "Satan before the fall".
"Orthodox" according to whom? This interpretation would have been considered spurious and very unorthodox prior to the Jerome translation that put Lucifer into Isaiah in the first place.
Others link Lucifer with Prometheus who stole light (wisdom?) from the gods to bring to man. These sects have had persistent groups of followers since the middle ages.
Prometheus is generally said to have stolen fire, not light. Light would be only one of the benefits of fire.
Since mentioning Gnosticism and Lucifer, the author could have also tied in the Ophites, who viewed the Serpent in the Garden of Eden as a liberator of mankind; and both the serpent and fire are said to have been dominant symbols in their rites. see http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/o/ophites.html
RL Barrett 18:26 May 6, 2003 (UTC)
