User talk:Lpereira74
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on Pay per chat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fan-1967 22:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your assertions
So you're doing an article about an advertising term that is only used by one site, but claim you're not promoting that site. Right.
A term only used by one site is a Neologism and not Notable. Fan-1967 22:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neologisms
Per Wikipedia policy: Avoid Neologisms. If a term is so new that only one enterprise is using it, and it shows no signs of widespread usage, it does not yet merit an article. It may, at some point in the future, if, and only if the concept and the term gain widespread usage. That time has clearly not yet come. Fan-1967 22:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
The term par per chat is directly related to online advertising in the local search space. An industry that clearly you do not understand. Terms and concepts such as pay per click, pay per call, and pay per post are also Neologism and not Notable to most people on planet Earth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] There's a big difference
Usage of the terms, based on Goggle searches:
- Pay-per click: Very widely used: Over 3 million Google search results
- Pay-per call: Quite widely used: Almost 900,000 Google search results
- Pay-per post: Quite widely used: Almost 400,000 Google search results
- Pay-per chat: Minimally used: Less than 2,000 Google search results
These are huge differences. Clearly the first three are established as widely used, notable terms. Yours is not. Fan-1967 23:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Is Google God? Are we going to start defining the relevance of human terms based on google search results? Have you heard of Search Engine Optimization? ( Lpereira74 23:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC) )
