Talk:Loveland frog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loveland frog article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on cryptozoology and cryptids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
WikiProject Ohio This article is part of WikiProject Ohio, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ohio. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Shadow over Innsmouth anyone? I know that there's not much of a point in mentioning theories but this certainly reminds one a little The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.116.39.63 (talk • contribs) .

... Thats exactly what I was just thinking. The ancients walk among us apparently. I'm buying a shotgun haha The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.19.153.134 (talk • contribs) .

This article clearly is the same as the Loveland Lizard and needs to be merged. Cameron 16:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

The "Loveland Lizard" entry was deleted due to copyright violation. However, we should probably still bring in the data mentioned in the original About.com article "The Top 10 Most Mysterious Creatures of Modern Times" (see entry #8) that it was copied from. 151.197.51.123 22:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Merge These two articles clearly describe the same (largely discredited) cryptid; no need exists for two separate articles. KevinOKeeffe 06:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Merge Clearly two separate articles on the same (dubious) thing. Nareek 04:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)