Talk:Louvre Pyramid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Louvre Pyramid is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France and Monaco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)
This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Egyptological subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.

I'm fairly sure the inverse pyramid is not directly below the glass pyramid. I think, from memory of a This info had been removed in a previous edit Cfitzart 19:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC) :

"The architect of the pyramid claims copyright on the monument and derivative images, and it has been questioned whether photos by members of the public taken of the pyramid are copyrighted."

In fact, it would probably fall in the fair use category, just like an image taken from a movie which is present on an article to represent this article thus the movie in question. 24.203.251.69 06:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] purpose

What is the use of this pyramid? --AlanH 02:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

It allows sunlight to reach underground galleries. I personally wish it would collapse in on itself. Charles 05:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "original proposal"

this addition needs to site a source and be reformatted for an encyclopedic style ka1iban 06:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "666 panes of glass"

Well, it is evident that it can't consist of 666 panes: all four sides of the pyramid are identical, and 666 isn't evenly divisble by four. --213.100.47.74 23:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Well if you look at the picture you'll see that there is an entrance on one side making all four sides not identical Oxyman 21:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)