Talk:Louie's Texas Red Hots

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The aforementioned Orchard Park location features a large Sabres logo with a bright red glowing eye, which can be slightly unsettling."

This sentence is a POV. The part of the sentence "...which can be slightly unsettling" is unnecessary and is a POV slant.ShenanigansTMJ 06:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

"Louie's offers free coffee to police officers, ensuring that late at night there is usually at least one officer enjoying a break in the restaurant and helping to instill an aura of safety."

This sentence is a POV. The officer is "enjoying" a break is a POV slant and should be changed.

I replaced "enjoying" with "taking". Please stop making frivolous edits to this page. --DarkElf109 05:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I haven't made any frivolous edits. I said the neutrality was disputed, which it was. The article is poorly written. It also does not cite its references or sources. Maybe you should quit being uppity. ShenanigansTMJ 06:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Adding a POV tag for one word is a frivolous edit, in my opinion. If you add cleanup tags, you should specifically explain what needs cleaning up, per Wikipedia:Cleanup. Additionally, there are sources in the article. Slapping tags on articles does nothing to help those articles, or Wikipedia as a whole. --Varco 14:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

The article has POV bias all over the place, and if I spent all of my time pointing out the flaws of the article, I would have wasted away my entire day. Keep the POV tag there until the dispute is settled in the talk page, or the POV slants are fixed. --ShenanigansTMJ 17:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to point out that most of the information in this article is not verifiable. The only things that are verifiable are homicide trivia, the menu items, and the fact that there are six restaurants. I ask that this article is cleaned up by removing all POV slants and all unverifiable references. Additionally, there are weasel words such as "a great deal" and "typical" that need to be addressed and modified. I have added the appropriate tags. --ShenanigansTMJ 21:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Why don't you fix the POV yourself? The article is short enough that you probably could have remedied it in the time it took you to add all of those tags and write these messages. I really don't see POV here, but perhaps that is because I am a large contributor to the article. I also think you should read Weasel word and tell me how "a great deal" and "typical" fit into the description. I don't see how anything is unverifiable and could not be fixed with a simple citation, other than the fact that police officers get free coffee.

Finally, I don't appreciate the harassment from you and your friends both on and off of Wikipedia, and your addition of frivolous tags to other articles (such as Chicken fingers. --Varco 03:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

You're right. "A great deal" and "typical" are not a weasel words and I removed the tag.--ShenanigansTMJ 04:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

The first paragraph alone contains POV slants.

The original location was founded in 1967 by Louie Galanes. This is fine. The restaurant serves a wide variety of food What constitutes a wide variety? A wide variety is not a clear, defined term, and is open 24 hours This is fine , which ensures that is a popular dining spot for residents of the greater Buffalo area of all ages and walks of life Typo not withstanding, how is this ensured? This is not a fact, nor is it corroborated by anything other than your personal opinion. The restaurant's tagline is "We don't serve fast food... we serve GOOD FOOD, FAST!" This is fine.

I think that you should fix this, since you're a major contributor. Perhaps this experience would help you to further develop your Wikipedian skills. Good luck, comrade! ShenanigansTMJ 04:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)