Talk:Lossiemouth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Lossiemouth is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Scotland To-do: edit Template:Scotland opentask

1 Pictures
2 Article
3 Timeline
4 References & Notes
5 GA status

[edit] Pictures

The pictures really need to be arranged better. --F a ng Aili 17:45, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I know. Was adjusting picture thumb-nail size as different browsers displayed screen differently. --Billreid, 16:04, 29 March 2006

[edit] Article

It's coming on very well & becoming quite comprehensive, as I wish all town articles would. Good work, Bill. --Tagishsimon (talk)

[edit] Timeline

There's some obscure functionality in wikipedia allowing you to make timelines - see Help:EasyTimeline syntax. I don't really know one end of it from the other, but thought I'd put my effort to date here, in the hope that either I or someone else will improve upon it & then parhaps replace the gif timeline in the article. Note that I've not made any effort to check the actual dates in the timeline (!) - Bill - you'd probably be able to do this. That part of the code is not too scary. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Removed timeline now that it is in the article. Hat's off to you for adopting it. --Tagishsimon (talk)

[edit] References & Notes

Bill, if you have ISBN numbers for any of the books in the referenfces list, so add them, in the form ISBN 184115007X, and they get wikilinked, which is a good thing. And you have some footnotes on the current value of shillings & such. Probably better to say "worth £1234 in 2006 currency", since "in today's currency" will not survive the test of time. --Tagishsimon (talk)