User talk:Loom91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Archive
Archives
  1. May 2005 – May 2006 (Dispute over Chandrabindu (band)
    and my blocking, among other things)

ATTENTION: I'm on a temporary wikibreak due to lack of spare time. During this time I won't be editing Wikipedia much, but I will likely read my talk page and email so you can contact me if you want.

This is my talk page, feel free to leave constructive and destructive comments. You won't be reverted unless you are clearly vandalising.



Contents

[edit] User:BengalRenaissanceEccentrica

The movie is named "Robibar Bikalbela", Sunday Afternoon in english. I don't keep up with the band culture avidly, but probably Fossils rule the youth segment currently, with Chandrabindu taking another portion. But I may be wrong. Loom91 07:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quantum Mechanics

Greetings! I read on the featured article page that the quantum mechanics article is in danger of losing FA status because of the factual inaccuracies. I have seen these inaccuracies, and I can remedy them for the article. I'll do a correct rewrite of the affected sections. By the way, you mentioned NPOV. The funny thing is, in physics, there simply is no POV. The mathematics founding a theory is self consistent and forms the core. There are only interpretations. However, in quantum mechanics the most widely accepted interpretation of the equations is the Born statistical interpretation, but I find it hard to come up with sources, since there is no single authorative source in a peer-reviewed science. Albester 08:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Juan Cole

Thanks for what you did. It unfortunately did not help. I do not think that anyone who endorsed the other statement even read the one I wrote, and the other statement mostly consisted of personal attacks without much basis in reality. Most of the signers of the other statement had not even been editing on the page until right before the page was blocked. I still do feel there is censorship going on. I put a note in on PAIN to report the personal attacks, but who knows what will happen with that. I'm not editing on Wikipedia anymore until something happens with this. It is really alarming and dissappointing. Elizmr 17:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] JEE moved to IIT-JEE

I was surprised to find that you have moved JEE to IITJEE without any discussion. There is no information on this topic on talkpage. Moving an article is big issue and consensus should have been taken. While it is true that JEE refers to many exams, predominant exam should get the title, while other can have a disambiguation page. By predominant, I mean, one which is more likely to be searched by people. In this case it is even more surprising because you referred to only one exam, WBJEE, which does not has its article page even. So I cannot figure out exactly what is need for moving or disambiguation? AshishGtalk 16:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The correct approach here should have been to create an article JEE (disambiguation) or Joint Entrance Examination (disambiguation), especially since there are a lot of article linking to the current one. Also, there was no need to hurry as there is no page on WB-JEE yet. I suggest we move back the page with some admin's help. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Taking your silence as accent, I am asking an admin to help with moving the pages. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Emergency!

We have an emergency! Report to CAUBXD immediately and click on the last "e" in the link "User:Fredil Yupigo/signature". FreddieAgainst Userbox Deletion? 18:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Freddie has discontinued CAUBXD because of community opposition. The "emergency" was that Cyde, the admin who had nominated many userboxes for deletion, had put his name on the list of those opposing userbox deletion. Timrem 00:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] References: Kolkata

Hi! No I have not contacted anyone. I have been busy for past few days, and did not come to Wikipedia frequently. I am in wikipedia for last two days, but again taking a break for about 20 days. If you want, please contact others, may be admins. Will talk about it when I am back. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi I am really sorry could not find enough time. I have an exam on 13 June. Hope to resolve this ref pattern thing after that. Please comply. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User atheist etc userboxes

This userbox seems to have gone through various versions. This is one of them. I'm happy to help you out with putting userboxes in your userspace as and when I have time, even the one that I disagree with (as one of the architects/supporters of T2) about supporting userboxes. It can be fiddly tracking them down, though, once they're deleted. At least I've got you a version of the atheism box.

ath This user is an atheist.


Hope this helps. If you still have any boxes that are speediable in their template form under T2, I suggest you userfy them, as I do think that T2, or the practice it makes explicit, is necessary and here to stay. Metamagician3000 13:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

And here's the code for one of the evolution ones you wanted.
This user acknowledges biological evolution.

And the drug one - hope this is the correct version.

This user is drug-free.


Remind me what the other two are, and I'll get to them in time. I think one was about userboxes and the other was another evolution one. Metamagician3000 13:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Here's your antiuserboxdeletion userbox. :)

AD The user is against the mass deletion of userboxes

Metamagician3000 00:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

And this looks like the last one you wanted. I'm happy to be of help.
evol-N This user is so certain of the theory of evolution, they await the memetic evolution of a fitter theory.
Metamagician3000 00:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)



[edit] About general relativity introduction

Hi Loom91,

I have just read your comments. Maybe is true that I am entering an advanced part, but I think it is needed for two things. First, because the focus that the media has given to the theory. Usually people hear about black holes and gravitational waves before even knowing about the special relativity, and I assume that a lot of visitors of this page will look for answers about this.

Second reason is that I have tried to explain the grounds in the first part of the article. If somebody reads on is because he wants more information. There is really a big gap between the introduction texts and the mathematical theory and it has to be filled somewere.

Anyway, I really need feedback. I was thinking that what I was writting was clear. I suppose everybody considers clear their own texts.... As you can see I am putting a lot of effort extending the article and then simplifying as possible the ideas, and in fact today I was planning to extend the part of the rigid disk with coriolis force and the four-potential. Or maybe is better not to enter this field. I really don't know.

Any suggestion? Which way should I go on from here? Maybe we could leave it like it is, but I really would like to explain more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Juansempere (talk • contribs).

[edit] Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion

You placed an opinion at RFD under an entry that had already been closed (Dokdo). Based upon the opinion & the fact that it wasn't in the correct place within the entry you did vote on, I think you actually meant to place it at the entry above that one (Pseudowallerian degeneration). I have moved it to that entry. If this was incorrect, please delete the opinion and remember that you should not modify a closed entry & that you should always add your opinion at the end. If it was correct, what happened was that a closure header will show up at the bottom of the previous entry (if the next entry is closed). You need to place your opinion before the closure header. If this didn't make sense, please let me know! Thanks. -- JLaTondre 13:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HELP

HELP on the Status of religious freedom in India article... it needs major work.WoodElf 15:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lots of userboxes

Hi, I see you have lots of userboxes on your page. Are you interested in starting your own userbox archive in userspace? Its really simple, helps migrating the boxes out of template: and out of reach of T1/T2 AND is basically the "German solution" Jimbo himself mentioned positively as "the middle ground". For an example click the X in my sig - I'd be happy to help ya, just leave a message on my talk page. CharonX/talk 16:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey There

Just saying hi, and letting you know I stole all your userboxes so I could play with them. Well, I didn't exactly steal them, but sort of borrowed them. Hope this is okay. You seem like a cool dude. Metrocat 18:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation and Recommendations for writing articles on Hindi Wikipedia

Hindi wikipedia invites and welcomes Wikipedians to contribute for the cause of spreading knowledge and the Hindi language. This page contains guidelines for writing a wiki-article on any topic at the Hindi Wikipedia, with special recommendations for writing in Hindi (Note: The script/font-family for Hindi is Devanāgari; the script/font-system for English is Roman script, also, the Hindi spelling system is not completely standardized). This article is yet in English language (mostly), in order to encourage even non-native/foreign people who have learnt/are learning Hindi to contribute to the Hindi wikipedia, and native Hindi speakers who normally write in English. The examples given below are only for explanation. Recommendations:

  1. Firstly for proper viewing, it is recommended to keep all links NOT-UNDERLINED. Otherwise the मात्रा below the Hindi alphabets might get partly hidden behind the underlines. For this, please go to My Preferences (मेरी पसंद) at the top of the page, then click Misc., and then choose "underline links -> Never". Save your settings. Also, do not click yes for "justify paragraphs", otherwise on some browsers, the devanagari script will appear highly distorted.
  2. All users are requested and encouraged to contribute articles here, especially, to create new articles on general topics. They are also encouraged to expand the existing articles, and improve upon them. A non-user can also do the same; it is recommended but not required to register yourself as a wikipedian user at the Hindi wikipedia. As far as possible, each article should be written with a Neutral Point of View (NPOV)—no nationalistic or partiality or hatred based articles are welcome. The articles should be based on facts—and appropriate references should be provided as and where needed. See the English wiki's help page for editing in general. Almost all the general wiki-features are available for editing on Hindi wiki too. Guidelines for the content matter is mostly the same as given in English wiki.
  3. Since the Hindi wiki is at its initial stages, users are welcome to take introduction and basic points from the English (or another) wikipedia's corresponding article and translate them for small articles. An in-page link to the English wiki's article will be deemed sufficient for references (a template might be created stating this). For longer articles, it is recommended to mention the references separately.
  4. Since most computer users in India and elsewhere have the standard Western-type keyboard, it is best recommended (but not necessarily required) to use the virtual (software) keyboard like the one of Hindimozhi or of ISIS (Tavultesoft Keyman)—which are freewares. These are advantageous because the contemporary Hindi-speakers in India often write messages/chat using Hindi words but written in Roman (English) script, and the layout of these keyboards is quite the same that such people use. For example, using the "normal" keyboard with this software, typing ga would give ग and ghaa would give घा.
  5. Create the article with its name written in Hindi (devanagari script). Always take care to include the nukta (dot below) for foreign / Urdu loanwords wherever it occurs in the standard spelling. For non-Indian names, use that spelling (for article name and other words) which is commonly encountered in Hindi newspapers, G.K.-books, Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries and Hollywood films and magazines. e.g., America-अमरीका (या अमेरिका), China-चीन, French-फ़्रांसिसी. For English acronyms/short-forms, use the initials in Roman script, and again create a full form in Hindi and redirect it to the short form. e.g. IPA (अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय ध्वनि वर्णाक्षर); UNO (संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ). Doing the opposite is also fine. But creating the article with the Hindi short form, as सं०रा०सं०, is not recommended. Also, the article proper must be written with the proper nukta, as फ़ारसी, and then, a non-nukta (mis-)spelt version फारसी should preferably be created to redirect to the correct spelling.
  6. Hindi wikipedia strongly recommends the users to write articles in everyday common Hindi in the खड़ीबोली dialect (Hindustani or Hindi-Urdu, i.e., बोलचाल वाली हिन्दी, which may include many loanwords from Persian and Arabic). The use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is in general neither required nor recommended. E.g., use: वजह instead of कारण, ख़ास instead of विशेष, वगैरह instead of इत्यादि, लेकिन instead of परन्तु etc. However, for technical and specialized vocabulary, the use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is recommended and usually mandatory. Thus: upper House of Parliament—संसद का उच्च सदन, but not Urdu—मजिलिस का ऐवान-ए-बाला ; Foreign Minister—विदेशमन्त्री, but not Urdu—वज़ीर-ए-ख़ारिजा ; knowledge/science—ज्ञान/विज्ञान, but not इल्म. Use spoken Hindi's ये and वो instead of यह and वह / वे. Do not use the title of respect जी after names, it is unencyclopedic. Thus: कृष्ण / श्री कृष्ण but not कृष्ण जी. Use the आप form and its corresponding 3rd person verbal conjugation for writing about respectable persons. Thus: श्री वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मे थे. But not: वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मा था. But do not use the pronoun "आप" itself in-text in biographies.
  7. English should be used sparingly, only when required; i.e., if the corresponding शुद्ध हिन्दी word is too "difficult and not generally encountered", or if it is a proper name of non-Indian person/place/terminology/title, or if the user is highly unsure of the proper translation. It is recommended (but not required) for English-to-Hindi translation while writing articles, the Shabdkosh online dictionary should be used. For each English word, that alternative should be used which is generally encountered in everyday spoken Hindi, and also fits well into the context. Use of intelligent guesses for newly encountered words is also allowed, and so are translations encountered in Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries, Hollywood films, Hindi-translated books, etc. e.g., दमपिशाच for en:Dementor (used in dubbed HP films).
  8. If used, it is recommended to use the English words within the articles using the English (Roman) alphabets rather than devanagari (or better, the devanagari transliteration should be used in the sentence, followed by the English word in Roman alphabet in parentheses). Such words should be italicized and not put in quotation marks. Preferably, there should be an in-page interwiki link (like :en:) on the word to the English wikipedia. If the word comes as an integral part of a sentence, so as not to break the continuity, the en: prefix should be hidden by writing the word again after the pipe sign (piped link). Thus, recommended: हैरी पॉटर ने ''[[:en:Pensieve|Pensieve]]'' के अन्दर ''[[:en:Little Hangleton|Little Hangleton]]'' गाँव में लॉर्ड वोल्डेमॉर्ट की माँ ''[[:en:Merope Gaunt|Merope Gaunt]]'' को देखा. ''[[:en:Resplendent Quetzal|Resplendent Quetzal]]'' पक्षी के ऊपर एक मेक्सिकन पादरी डा० ''[[:en:Pablo de la Llave|Pablo de la Llave]]'' ने काफ़ी शोध किया था. Whence,
    • हैरी पॉटर ने Pensieve के अन्दर Little Hangleton गाँव में लॉर्ड वोल्डेमॉर्ट की माँ Merope Gaunt को देखा
    • Resplendent Quetzal पक्षी के ऊपर एक मेक्सिकन पादरी डा० Pablo de la Llave ने काफ़ी शोध किया था
  9. Always start the first 1 or 2 lines of the article giving its definition (from any standard dictionary/other wiki) or suitable introduction. Thus, recommended: ललिता सहस्रनामन हिन्दू धर्मसुधारक आदि शंकराचार्य द्वारा रचित देवी दुर्गा को समर्पित एक पूजा-मन्त्र है, जिसे कई हिन्दू रोज़ श्रद्धा से जपते हैं । But not: ललिता सहस्रनामन मन्त्र जपने के लिये लड्डू-पेड़ा, ताम्बुल, सिन्दूर, लाल चुनरी के साथ नित्य इस मन्त्र का पाठ करें, तो जल्द ही गड़ा हुआ ख़जाना मिलेगा । Recommended: वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी (en:Aeronautical engineering) विमानों (en:Aircrafts) की अभिकल्पना, निर्माण और प्रचालन करने का विज्ञान, कला और कार्य है । (translated from Eng. Webster's New World Dictionary). But not: आजकल वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी के लिये देशभर में कई कॉलेज खुल गये हैं, जिनमें अग्रणी स्थान यूटोपिया स्थित लालू-यादव टेक्लिनक कॉलेज का है ।
  10. For names of countries, cities, places, languages, people, books, films, technical vocabulary, mythology, etc, start the article like this:
    • 1. The name in bold ('''अपोलो''')
    • 2. starting parenthesis, then English name in Roman script, in-page interwiki-linked to English wiki ff. by semicolon ((अंग्रेज़ी : [[:en:Apollo]];)
    • 3. The native name(s) if applicable in the italicized native script, preferably followed either by its italicized approximate Hindi pronunciation or non-italicized phonological transcription within / /, ff. by closed parenthesis (यूनानी : ''Aπollων अपोल्लोन''))
    • 4. the rest of the definition or introduction (प्राचीन [[यूनानी धर्म]] (ग्रीक धर्म) और प्राचीन [[रोमन धर्म]] के सर्वोच्च देवता थे ।) For country names, only the standard short form of the name is needed in the first line. If there is a common name for a difficult word in Hindustani, also mention it. Whence: अपोलो (अंग्रेज़ी : en:Apollo; यूनानी : Aπollων अपोल्लोन) प्राचीन यूनानी धर्म (ग्रीक धर्म) और प्राचीन रोमन धर्म के सर्वोच्च देवता थे । If you don't give the interwiki English/another language link (which would be deemed to be the default reference), then you MUST provide an appropriate reference.
  11. Please leave no article without an appropriate category. See the list of created categories here; you can also make a new category (pref. in Hindi). Please leave no article without at least ONE off page (like en:) interwiki link. E.g., the user can check the article name (say Apollo) on the finally redirected English page and append to the Hindi article ([[en:Appolo]])). These interlanguage links will help a bot to update all interwiki links for that article in all wikipedias. The category and the aforementioned link should be typed at the end of the article. If the article is very small, mention it as a stub/substub.
  12. Use of templates is welcome. See the list of templates here. If creating a template, name it pref. in Hindi.
  13. Use पूर्णविराम ( । ) instead of a period (.) for ending statements. The पूर्णविराम, semicolon, colon and dash (but not comma) must come after one space after the word to prevent ambiguity. Use the international form of the Hindu-Arabic numerals (1,2,3 instead of १,२,३), as used by the Constitution and the Government of India (even for Hindi). There is no need to use the हलन्त at the end of Sanskrit words wherever it occurs. Hence, prefer: संसद over संसद्; अथर्वन over अथर्वन्. Use the proper quotation marks “” from the Insert toolbox, not "". Write dates as 2 मई 2006 (ईसवी or ईसापूर्व). Write time as 3:45 pm. Separate common suffix-words like शास्त्र, विज्ञान, ज्ञान with a hyphen. Thus: रसायन-शास्त्र. For most others, leave both the words of the noun-cluster free. Combine them into one word only if it is very common to do so. Thus: सामवेद.
  14. The use of ज़ for the en:voiced alveolar fricative (/z/, as in zoo, rose) is fundamentally wrong. Its nearest counterpart is the en:voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ (as in sea), and not Hindi ज (en:voiced palatal plosive). Hence, it is suggested and recommended that for the sound /z/, whether it comes in English (etc.) spellings (z) for while pronunciation otherwise, should be transcribed as स़ (स with a dot below, available in the Insert toolbox). Hence: Reason रीस़न, not रीज़न ; Roses रोस़ेस़, not रोज़ेज़. But common Hindi words borrowed from Persian/Arabic (so-called Urdu words) are allowed to continue with ज़ spelling. Thus: ज़रा, नज़र, तर्ज़. The en:voiced postalveolar fricative (/ʒ/ as in treasure), inexistent in Hindi, can similarly be transcribed with श़. Thus: treasure ट्रॅश़र. The nukta (dot) available in the Insert toolbox can be combined with various consonants to suggest a more exact phonetic devanagari rendering of foreign sounds. E.g., since phonetically, English Think and this are not equal to थिंक and दिस, a better transcription could be थ़िंक and द़िस. Please take care of the dot below in so-called Urdu words, otherwise the Hindi spelling is deemed incorrect.
  15. For the following English vowels met, mate, mat, transcribe as मॅट (short vowel), मेट (not मेइट), मैट (not मॅट, as popular in Marathi). However in contemporary Hindi and here, it is acceptable to use ए instead of ऍ. Thus: अमेरिका is more popular than अमॅरिका. For cot, coat, caught, transcribe as कॉट, कोट, कॉट (not कौट). Transcribe English /t/ and /d/ as ट and ड.
  16. Use half-न before त, थ, द, ध, न, instead of anuswaar अं. Use half-म before प, फ, ब, भ, म. Use the anuswaar before all the rest of the consonants (not half-ङ, ञ, ण). If the मात्रा is not above the alphabet, use chandra-bindu, but only for nasalization. Thus: अन्दर, not अंदर ; अन्त, not अंत ; हिन्दी, not हिंदी ; सम्भव, not संभव ; पंचमी, not पञ्चमी ; अंडा, not अण्डा ; कंठ, not कण्ठ ; लैंड, not लैण्ड ; आँख, not आंख. However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here; the prec. are just recommendations.
  17. When proceded by another vowel, use the pure vowels instead of य (unless the य is clearly articulated while pronouncing). Thus : जाएँ, not जायें (not जावें) ; आएगा, not आयेगा . However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here.
  18. Please pay careful attention to the masculine/feminine gender (and singular/plural) in adjectives and verbs, else the sentence becomes ungrammatical.
For more information/suggestions/criticisms, please contact any one of the administrators of Hindi wiki here, preferably en:User:Magicalsaumy. This page can also be found here.

Thank you,

Cygnus_hansa 02:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] HELP!!

ok as you have probably already noticed my userboxes have gone weird. I tried to play around but that didnt work so i was wandering if you may be edit it and make it clean lol. Shall be grateful. Merci. oh and i didnt know u were into photography. Really love your black and white pictures. what camera do you use? BengalRenaissanceEccentrica 00:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Novels WikiProject Newsletter June 2006

Here is a new initiative for our project. You are recieving this as you have at some point signed up as a "member" of the project. Have a look at the newsletter via the link and see what you think. The June 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Novels WikiProject Newsletter July 2006

Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The July 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] template:seeintro nominated for deletion

I've nominated this because (at least in its present form) this template encourages disregard of conventions that help avoid confusion and extra work. Michael Hardy 22:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Novels WikiProject Newsletter August 2006

Here is the new edition of our monthly newsletter. The August 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Preamble

Loom91: You don't really seem to be "taking a break" from editing Wikipedia articles. The preamble to the article has been there for long time and you seem to be the only person who has a problem with it. Your user page says a lot about what you do (edit a lot of articles) and you seem to take pride in that. I don't. It's better to spend time on individual projects and get it right. A lot of other contributors to the thermodynamic temperature article spent time in the discussion page as issues over absolute zero and kinetic motion were hashed out. You have the self-esteem of someone who bypasses such niceties and rushes to judgment by deleting entire paragraphs and then leaving comments like "that's stupid" in your wake. You need to stop, read, and understand what you're doing before you do a "drive-by shooting" on an article because you've taken it upon yourself to decide what content you're in the mood to permit.

The preamble in the article on thermodynamic temperature serves an important purpose. Too many contributors to Wikipedia tend to just throw a whole bunch of techno-babble and formulas into articles that they get out of their text books. The result is a hodge podge of poorly fitting text that is hard to read and serves little purpose. Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, stated on Friday, the first day of Wikimania, that "Although we've always had this goal of Britannica: ‘quality or better’, we're not there yet." “We can no longer feel satisfied and happy when we see these (article) numbers going up. We should continue to turn our attention away from growth and towards quality.” (my emphasis). He also said quality can be improved if entries were written less choppily, for example, or better identified their sources. That's pretty darn clear to me: to blazes with new articles; the quality of Wikipedia articles must improve. The preamble is there to help prevent the same old crap that makes Wikipedia technical articles suffer.

Have you actually read the thermodynamic temperature article? It's one of the more visited technical sites on Wikipedia and has been linked to by a number of universities after I had been corresponding with the Ph.D.s on various issues on thermodynamics. Where do you think three of its six graphics came from(?); I created them and that takes a lot of time. What's your contribution? You delete stuff when you happen upon it. This is especially ironic since you state in your user page that “I hate POV-pushing, censorship and deletionist viewpoints above all else.”. How would you like it if I started visiting the sites where you've been editing and delete some of it—not because it is factually incorrect but only because I disagree with it—and leave only an explanation that I did so because it's "stupid." I guarantee you that if I scrutinize the work you've done, I can find fault with it, delete it, and—parhaps—replace it with something better. Think a bit more about things before acting. If you think the preamble serves a poor purpose and needs to be deleted, raise the issue in the discussion page and get feedback from others until there is a consensus. I've copied this to the discussion page of thermodynamic temperature; post your response there. And if you just go and delete it again, I'll consider it mindless vandalism and revert it. Greg L 01:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Your ideas of 'discussion' and 'consensus' are rather intriguing. They seem to be focused around making threats of deleting others contributions and calling edits mindless vandalism. Loom91 18:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Ki re

kire ki khobor? BengalRenaissanceEccentrica 07:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Chalta hai, duniya hai :-) Between school, studies, computer, friends, rather busy. It's hard finding time o sqeeze in everything. How are you? Kobe jano ekhane aschhis? Loom91 10:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Me too. Loom91 11:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Has your movie come out yet? BengalRenaissanceEccentrica 19:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, it released in Nandan. The reception was exceptional by Nandan standards. We hit house full in the third day. We grossed 32000 in a week in a 200-seater hall even with virtually no publicity. For comparison, the heavily publicized Manush Bhoot running in the 1000-seater grossed 47000 in 2 weeks. We were not given extension due to political reasons. Loom91 11:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Integral vs antiderivative

I left some messages at talk:integral and talk:Derivative. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

Hi. Please use an edit summary when you contribute, it helps others understand what you changed. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject AFL Hi mate, if you're a fan of Aussie rules, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL (join by adding your name to the list of participants) and the Australian rules football portal. Also take a look at Category:VFL/AFL players and feel free to drop me a line with any questions, or on the WP:AFL discussion page. Cheers!

Rogerthat Talk 04:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV (September 2006)

The September 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 12:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Wikipedia article 'Pushpak' -- Review

Dear Wikipedian,

I would like to invite you (along with other Wikipedia readers and editors who may be interested) in reviewing the above Wikipedia article. Details about this call for review is found in the discussion page of the above-mentioned article. Your participation would be valued. Splashprince 07:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newtonian mechanics

Thanks for merging it! --Ling.Nut 12:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] hello

hey do you go on orkut?BengalRenaissanceEccentrica 18:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I'm on orkut under loom91, but I don't go there often. Not much to do. Loom91 07:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Satyajit Ray

Regarding this reversion, Shmitra agrees with me that the prior version was preferable. What is your justification for the reversion? Biruitorul 00:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Today's featured article

Just wanted to let you know a featured article you worked on, 0.999..., was featured today on the Main Page. Tobacman 00:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HF

we seem to be reverting back and forth on the HF structure and bonding, so let's talk. The H-F bonds in HF are not equivalent based on diffraction studies. Do you read the information diffferently - The monographs and the technical reports read to me that the two H-F distances are quite disparate. Please provide citations for your assertion and we can improve the article together and WE will benefit. Cheers and looking forward to your response.--Smokefoot 13:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I concur with Smokefoot's remark. Could you provide references with your changes when you reinsert them? Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your note on HF. In general, before you alter such scientific articles it is a good idea to cite original research. WE-chem is watched by several professional chemists. Best wishes,--Smokefoot 14:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - April 2007

The April 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by Grafikbot 11:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/o/o/User_talk%7ELoom91_e023.html"