LogoVisual thinking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.
Please help improve the introduction to meet Wikipedia's layout standards. You can discuss the issue on the talk page.

LogoVisual thinking developed out of structural communication, systematics - study of multi-term systems and other work of J. G. Bennettin the 1960s. It began in the domain of secondary education but developed into a method for management, conferencing and study. It is both an overall concept and a particular methodology. As a general concept it covers the region of learning and communication in which three modes of intelligence are combined for understanding: verbal, visual and haptic; related to multiple intelligences. The structure of the process supports metacognition.

The acronym LVT also stands for 'logovisual technology'.

1 Description
2 References
3 Related Subjects
4 External links

[edit] Description

LVT evolved independently but in parallel with Tony Buzan’s mindmapping, Edward de Bono’s lateral thinking, Japanese affinity diagrams, Robert Horn’s [[visual language], Gabriele Rico's 'clustering' and many other emergent trends from the 1960s onwards. It makes the making of meaning the main focus of its technology. The technology extends verbal expression to visual arrangement and brings into play physical manipulation of 'meaning objects'. The haptic component of physical contact and action is a primary distinguishing feature of LVT.

It emphasises the logos or meaning of words in statements that are 'molecules of meaning', which can be understood autonomously and in combinations. Each molecule of meaning (MM) exists on a separate object. MMs can be placed on a visual display and moved around in relation to each other. Meaningful aggregates of MMs are replaced by higher order MMs. Use of MMs distinguishes LVT from other current techniques of display such as mindmapping because (a) MMs are statements and not single words (b) they are free to be moved about and are not fixed in position (c) they can form into any kind of pattern and not just hierarchical ones. In principle, every MM can be seen in the context of any of the other MMs in a given set.

The technological freedom of MMs enables people to suspend collapse into set forms and/or conclusions (convergent thinking), while providing structure to their explorations (divergent thinking). A complex process of thinking by a group can easly be tracked and recorded.

LVT supports process of democracy because it enables people to think together. It articulates thinking in a public shared space, in which structure is given equal attention to content. It relates strongly to dialogue and can be called a 'technology of dialogue'.

There are five standard stages in the process.

1. Focus - identifying a question or theme that provides a basis for a common act of attention

2. Gather - generating, articulating and displaying separate MMs as a relevant set as in a gathering (decision making)

3. Organise - arranging and aggregating MMs to form (separate) higher order MMs

4. Integrate - systematic or aesthetic unification of these MMs into a whole system

5. Realise - creative or 'willed' outcome

LVT emphasises the importance of articulate statement. Each MM is symbolic of an individual in a social setting, capable of finding many complex relations with other individuals; rather than a 'thing' that has to be fixed into a mechanical order.

In the stage of Gathering, the assembly of MMs is deliberately chaotic. This allows for complexity in aggregations.

In stage three, organization can be of different kinds but in particular explore the tensions between using prefigured forms - classifications, hierachies, etc. - and allowing the MMs to self-organise. The flexibility and range of Organise in LVT distinguishes it from the use of set forms as in mindmapping. The capacity to insert, remove and rearrange MMs in organising is a totally new dimension of thinking technology.

The fourth stage of integration draws on structural insights into complex texts, in particular the principles of ring composition as discovered by the English anthropologist Mary Douglas.

The stages move from contemplation to decision making.