Talk:List of woods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page. |
| List | This article has been rated as List-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] What to include on this list
If ALL woods were included, the list would be several thousand species long! Personally, I think inclusion here should be limited to species of major commercial importance: extensively sold on international markets, and/or widely planted in reforestation programmes. Have removed one or two which are of only very minor local importance. - MPF 10:16, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Also I think that closely related species not separated in the wood trade should be listed as a single entry; the link can provide further details of the species involved for follow-up (e.g. white oaks for the very similar woods of White oak, Bur oak, Swamp white oak, etc., all harvested and sold mixed as a single trade item. Haven't edited on this though: anyone else any thoughts? - MPF 10:16, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Queries
Does rosewood and sandlewood belongs here? There is another kind of wood used in model airplanes, what is its name?
- Balsa wood? Adam Bishop 21:47, 13 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Yes, rosewood and sandlewood do belong, as they are commercially important; ditto for balsa. - MPF 10:16, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Yew
Changing the "Yew" link from disambiguation page to the Taxaceae family page. Please specify the genus and species if you can. J. Finkelstein 21:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- I have changed this to "European Yew" (Taxus baccata), which seems to be the only species in Taxaceae of major horticultural and commercial importance. SCHZMO ✍ 23:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Soft vs. Hard wood
How are the two lists in the article classifier? The title and the contents does not match. For example, in the article about balsa, it says it is a VERY SOFT wood, yet balsa is listed under hardwood? I'm confused. Kowloonese 00:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Balsa is a "hardwood" because it comes from an angiosperm tree, while "softwoods" come from conifers (or gymnosperm) trees. Note that "hardwood" and "softwood" are a bit of a misnomer. Some softwoods are pretty hard (e.g. yew and douglas-fir), harder than many hardwoods, while you noted that balsa is a soft wood (but not a softwood). The microscopic structure and characteristics of the two types of wood are quite different. Following the links to hardwood, softwood, conifer, angiosperm and gymnosperm should clarify things for you. HTH Luigizanasi 16:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank for the explanation. Such misnomers are not obvious to the laymen. IMHO, disclaimers such as "softwood \= soft wood" and "hardwood \= hard wood" are in order. Kowloonese 22:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- I should have said that most hardwoods (with a few exceptions like balsa) are in fact harder than most softwoods. So it's not entirely a misnomer. Luigizanasi 02:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank for the explanation. Such misnomers are not obvious to the laymen. IMHO, disclaimers such as "softwood \= soft wood" and "hardwood \= hard wood" are in order. Kowloonese 22:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
