Talk:List of indie game developers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Portal:CVG
 CVG Portal
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of Mid priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
CVG To-do:

Contents

[edit] Articles Merged 13-Apr-2006

While doing a search, I found both this article and List of independent game developers, which mentioned only Flying Lab Software and PopCap Games. I added Flying Lab to this list and made List of independent game developers into a redirect to this article. —Chris Chittleborough 07:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cornutopia

Does Cornutopia (http://www.cornutopia.net/) meet the criteria for inclusion here? They've been around since 1991. —Chris Chittleborough 07:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I've added Cornutopia. Cheers, User:Chris Chittleborough alias CWC(talk) 11:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criteria for Inclusion

The paragraph just before the list says "Only financially stable indie game developers who have been around for some time are listed here". I strongly suspect this page will attract link-spam, so I've created this section as a place to refine our criteria. Cheers, CWC(talk) 11:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Should we list only developers who have released at least two games?
Sorry man, I put Hamumu in there because thery're also indie game developers.
Now, if i vandalised, i'm sorry. RocketMaster 12:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
No worries. Hamumu clearly belong in the list. You did nothing wrong. Cheers, CWC(talk) 13:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criteria- reply

  • I think listing just companies would be a mistake: there have been quite a few indie games that have "notability" but are not created by companies. Surely excluding non-company indie developments, whilst helping to keep the list concise, would actually devalue this list, as a large proportion would

I think I agree with the 2 game minimum though- this would help to weed out the less notable links, but would this allow a "studio" which has released, say, 2 very basic games (everyone who programs games has probably created a basic Space Invaders clone and Tic Tac Toe, preference over a studio which has developed just one larger project, but which has been more popular?

Other than that, the list is pretty useful, and I thought the article was great too!

Feel free to leave your thoughts here or on my talk page.

EvocativeIntrigue 12:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Specific Cases

This section is for discussing whether individual developers should be removed from the list (and possibly moved to a more appropriate article).

Rampant Games (http://www.rampantgames.com)
Have only developed one game so far[1], Void War (see http://www.voidwar.com/); the other games on their website are not theirs. CWC(talk) 11:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Team Chaos (http://users3.ev1.net/%7Evictory2112/index.htm)
Have only one game, Total Chaos: Battle at the Frontier of Time, which is Amiga shareware, released 2004-04-17. CWC(talk) 11:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Persistent Realms LLC (http://www.persistentrealms.com/)
Our article on this company was deleted a few weeks ago: see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Persistent_Realms_LLC. They are developing Ilyrias, the Aegadian Isles, a MMORPG which apparently will be their first game. See the developers blog at http://ilyrias.blogspot.com/. They have a forum going, but both http://www.persistentrealms.com/ and http://www.ilyrias.com/ have "coming soon" notices.
Deleted for now. CWC(talk) 01:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hamumu Software

Somebody forgot to add Hamumu Software to your indie games list.

Thankfully, you have The Rocket Master to save the day.

[edit] Advertising vehicle

A user added Funkitron (a broken link) to the list, but Peephole removed it, claiming it was "advertising." I'm the first to object to inappropriately using Wikipedia, but I don't see how adding a link to a list is inappropriate. I have no idea who Funkitron is, but looking at their website, they look like a legitimate developer and as deserving of an article as any other developer on the list. Broken links are not spam, they are the starting points for new articles. I, therefore, think Funkitron deserves a place on the list. Anyone oppose? Why? — Frecklefoot | Talk 20:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Support. This article is inherently a linkspam magnet, so we should establish and enforce a policy about who gets listed here; like User:Frecklefoot, I think that policy should err on the side of inclusiveness, meaning redlinks are fine. CWC(talk) 10:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose Just take a look at user Dave his contributions, they consist of little more than advertising for his company funkitron.[2] The actual funkitron article has been deleted several times. I think it would be best to restrict the list to only include notable developers that have a wikipedia article. Listing every single indie developer would just make this list ridiculously long.--Peephole 12:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree that this article could be a HUGE target for people wanting to promote their personal business/side business/whatever. And I think those types of links should be vigorously discouraged. But it seems like Funkitron is a legit indie game developer, so I though (and still think) it should be allowed. Maybe it shouldn't be written by Dave635, but someone else who isn't connected with the company. Including a broken link for the article could encourage someone to write an article on it. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support The problem is that guys like Peephole are going around deleting stuff knowing nothing about the game industry or the context of what is posted. For example, I learned Wiki the hard way, I wrote on article on Funkitron that was similar in nature to Popcap's in terms of style and content, and someone deleted. I tried to repost, addressing their concerns, but as soon as the delete wagon gets going, it gets really tough to stop it. So even though Funkitron has put out many top ten games in the casual/indie business, Scrabble, Scrabble Blast, Boggle Supreme, Slingo Deluxe, Poker Superstars II, I am unable to write an article on them because people like Peephole are 'delete crazy' without even knowing about the field they are deleting things in. I have since given up trying to include Funkitron on the wiki with its own article about the company, having not figured out a way to get through to the delete page crazies who patrol and are quick to speedy delete anything that comes back without even reading what has changed. On a page like this, with a list like this, I can't imagine why you wouldn't have a company like Funkitron listed. It is as noteable, and even more so, than many of the companies listed. I would just ask, that if you are going to delete things, don't just be a delete nazi and blanket delete things, but understand and consider the reason why something is on the page it is on, and if it fits. Okay, I've had my say, thanks for listening. Cheers. --Dave635 13:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Maybe if your contributions to Wikipedia were less focussed on your site's products and were more inclusive in nature, people would be less suspicious about your contributions. Just my $.02... — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose. The article for Funkitron was deleted as a non-notable company and failing WP:CORP; the article for Funkitron, Inc. was speed deleted as a duplicate of the former (it was not deleted as advertising, per Dave635's claim). --Dennis The TIger 16:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
But the problem was that Funkitron is a notable company in the casual game space. As notable or even more notable than many companies that are in this space and are listed in wikipedia, for example [Silver Creek Entertainment] or [Flying Lab Software]. It does not fail the WP:CORP test by anyone who knows the space. The problem may be, that if you look at the criteria for the WP:CORP (which is limited in the sense it applies to huge companies, but not to the many smaller companies that exist in the game developer world, and that are very important to that world), a way to apply it so it is meaningful to the Casual/Indie Game space would be: "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." would be applied by asking "The company and games have been reviewed by multiple game review sites, game press and game portals." and "The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications" would be applied with "The companies games are or have been on the top ten on many game sites." This is how I would apply the criteria to indie game companies. This sort of technique can be used to judge companies that appear on this list, and companies that should have a page on wikipedia.Dave635 17:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
In which case, this talk page is probably not the most appropriate place to discuss and/or lament the deletion of Funkitron's articles - little more than bitching and moaning will be accomplished here. The reason for my opposition is in my own observation: Dave635 had allegedly recreated an article that had been previously deleted, and that alone is criteria for a speedy delete. Had it gone through deletion review, this wouldn't be so much of a problem if the deletion were overturned; and as such, that is my suggestion, is to bring the deletion of Funkitron (rather than Funkitron, Inc.) up for such a review, then do a redirect on the latter article - or something like that. See the RfD for either article for the appropriate link to bring this up. --Dennis The TIger 23:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
I think we should separate the general issue of how we decide whether to list a developer from the specific issue of Funkitron. On the latter: now that I know the background (thanks, Peephole and Dennis The TIger), I say we should definitely not have a redlink for it. On the former: see below. Cheers, CWC(talk) 12:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Possible Policies

An article like this needs a fairly clear policy on who should be listed to avoid getting swamped with linkspam, IMO. Our old policy, as set out in the article itself, was:

[S] List only financially stable indie game developers who have been around for some time

with an implicit requirement that they should have released at least one game.

User:Peephole recently applied a much stricter requirement, something like:

[A] List only developers about whom Wikipedia already has an article.

I implicitly softened this to

[C] List only developers who have a Wikipedia article about them or a game they developed.

Another possible policy is:

[M] List developers only if
  1. we have an established article about them or a game they developed, or
  2. they are financially stable and have lasted at least two years.

(By "established article" I mean one that does not meet WP:CSD, is more than a basic stub, has lasted at least a month, etc.)

A slightly stricter version of [M] is:

[K] List developers only if
  1. we have an established article about them or a game they developed, or
  2. they are financially stable, have lasted at least two years and have released at least two games.

I've labelled the possibilities with letters that indicate strictness: "A" = strictest, later in alphabet = less strict.

What do you think about these possible policies? (Feel free to suggest more alternatives, too.) CWC(talk) 12:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Votes

  • [M] CWC(talk) 12:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • [A] As they do in the List_of_multiplayer_browser_games article. --Peephole 15:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • [C] This seems to fit more closely with List_of_multiplayer_browser_games, Peep, as many of those games don't have separate articles for the developer. For this list if neither the developer nor their games are notable enough for articles, then they're not notable enough to warrant a list entry regardless of financial state. --grummerx 16:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • [M] There may be cases where you have a developer with known games but no wiki yet. As with Sandlot, which I added but has no wiki pages yet, though they are a well known and successful indie developer. Dave635 19:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

I see there has been no further discussion on this topic since September. I plan on removing all red links in about a week if the articles are not created. Please realize that some of these comapnies may wind up speedied or AfD'd once created, I have no idea what notability any of them have. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/i/s/Talk%7EList_of_indie_game_developers_bc5c.html"