Talk:List of collectors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] From VFD

  • List of collectors - This "list" only contains two people. Either add more and revise the article, or delete. -Flockmeal 21:28, Feb 18, 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete - a list lacking a list - Texture 21:40, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete. Dumb. Anthony DiPierro 23:02, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete. If there were actually a lot of collectors listed it could be worth keeping, but not with only 2 people. Jacob1207 00:13, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete. Pointless - Change vote to keep now it's been improved - Graham :) 12:15, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Merge with collecting before deleting. Jay 19:10, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Keep. There are now five items and the page can grow endlessly. BL 09:33, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
    • Impossible list to maintain. Redirect to collecting or similar article. Rossami 04:17, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete because of no interest whatsoever. Herbee 04:30, 2004 Feb 23 (UTC)
    • Keep. Valid list. I've added a section on stamps. Link with more articles and make it grow. Jay 08:16, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete. Inane. Will we have List of quilters next? Davodd 00:42, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
    • It's no worse than the rest of the lists and now contains more than two people, so keep. Angela. 21:37, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete. Agree with Davodd. PMC 17:29, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete: pointless. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:28, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Fictional collectors? Why?

An anonymous user added:

If the consensus is that adding fictional characters is worthwhile then it should be in a new section. Personally I didn't see any value in it so I just took it out. I arrived at this page by tracking back the edits of this IP address which had been responsible for some vandalism so I was not disposed to be tolerant. --Spondoolicks 09:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/i/s/Talk%7EList_of_collectors_b9a8.html"