Talk:List of beaches in New England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Divide list even further

I think that this list should be subdivided into separate state pages. This page is long, and would be easier to read if it were divided by state. Just my two cents, anybody else want to chime in? --No1lakersfan 00:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC) No one's going to read a list of towns that could have beaches in them.--Loodog 05:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] unusable

This article is unusable and of no value. It has about 15 beaches, with all links to blank pages, between far more towns and cities, which are listed regardless of whether they have any beach or coastline at all. The state of Vermont, which has no oceanfront, is here. This reads like a list of cities and towns in New England more than of beaches.

I agree that this article is very weak. However, Vermont does have beaches (on Lake Champlain). I wouldn't say they are great beaches, but they're there nonetheless.--Caliga10 11:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Why list cities like Andover, Connecticut in an article titles "list of beaches in New England"? They have no beaches. Their articles have no beaches listed. If someone could trim this list down to useful size (only communities with actual beaches, or even communities that MENTION beaches on their articles), it just might cease to be useless.--Loodog 03:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Since some people clearly think this article is worth saving, I've begun the process of making it useful. I have deleted all cities/towns in Rhode Island that simply could not have beaches based on location alone. Also added a few beaches. If this can be done for all the states, we just might have an article of some value.--Loodog 01:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Seriously a useless article currently. WildlifeAnalysis 13:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)