Talk:List of Peabody Award winners
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by the Radio WikiProject.
This project provides a central approach to Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
This article is way too long. It should be split up by decade.. ie: Peabody Award winners (1940-1949) and etc. --Brad101 17:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, but have no idea how to do this. (Yes, I realise I could find out... ) Anyone else have the skills? --Ladybirdintheuk 14:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Table
The table someone has started to add needs cleanig up - if no-one beats me to it, I will work on that once I've sorted out the actual text formatting. I think we need to add it as one long table, so that all the columns are even. Unless anyone knows a better way? -Ladybirdintheuk 10:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I made all the existing tables the same size. One long table would be difficult for future spliting of the article. Medvedenko 23:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now just to work out how to make the columns the same width. I'm away for the weekend from ... in about 2 hours. (I really should be packing right now!) It can be my project for when I get back :)
- Hi. I'm the one who started the switch to the table layout. I was going to format the column widths after the conversion (there is a lot of copy/pasting involved in the conversion). Anyway, I used a 30%/70% split for the column widths. Let me know what you think. I'm trying to strike a balance that would look nice on most monitors without looking too spaced out on the larger displays. We could also use a fixed pixel size to define the width, but that might look really strange on smaller displays. --Jeysaba 19:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think it looks good. Medvedenko 00:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- It looks great on my work monitor:) (I will check when I get home too.) I shall finish wikifying, then help out with all the copy and past tedium! -Ladybirdintheuk 08:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm the one who started the switch to the table layout. I was going to format the column widths after the conversion (there is a lot of copy/pasting involved in the conversion). Anyway, I used a 30%/70% split for the column widths. Let me know what you think. I'm trying to strike a balance that would look nice on most monitors without looking too spaced out on the larger displays. We could also use a fixed pixel size to define the width, but that might look really strange on smaller displays. --Jeysaba 19:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now just to work out how to make the columns the same width. I'm away for the weekend from ... in about 2 hours. (I really should be packing right now!) It can be my project for when I get back :)
