Talk:List of Half-Life mods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Unreleased mods?
Is is O.K. to post unrelease mods? Danm36 16:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- No. --InShaneee 14:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Other mods..
So I take it once a mod is released retail it's not considered a mod anymore? -- Kflorence 04:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I guess so Danm36 16:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
It's a mod if it can't run standalone. If it can run standalone, then it's a game.
With Steam this is difficult to decide. You can for example purchase Counter-Strike without buying Half-Life. Steam will then download Half-Life (the game on which CS is based), but it won't allow you to play HL, only CS. This is because Steam has a content management system, controlling which software the user has access to. --Pizzahut2 19:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
There is still a strong concept of mods in Steam. The cited example of Counter-Strike has been stand-alone for a long time and I would not consider it to be a mod any more. However, I still think it should remain in the list due to it's origins as a mod and that it is probably one of the most significant, influential and popular mods. --AJanuary 10:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Azure Sheep?
What about azure sheep. good game. i played it.
Here are the awards:
- [ ten four ] Silver : http://tenfourmaps.telefragged.com/php/review.php?gameid=hl&levid=azure
- 3D Action Planet: Any way you look at it, Azure Sheep is a great, top notch, single player experience that any Half-Life fan should try out. If you are tired of all those single player episodes that are too easy, you have another thing coming : http://www.3dactionplanet.com/features/reviews/azuresheep/
- Hanger16.com: 5/5 , Gold Award. http://web.archive.org/web/20050530005344/www.hangar16.com/Features/Reviews/AS_revu.htm
Quite a few here: http://halflife.multiplayer.it/azuresheep/reviews.asp
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brontos (talk • contribs) 16:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. --Pizzahut2 18:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion logs of mods listed in the article
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pizzahut2 (talk • contribs) 11:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] To do list
- Adding the mods listed at Category:Half-Life mods.
- Somehow categorising the page, according to the current AfD discussion. (Any suggestions?)
- Writing a mod article for Sven Co-op.
--Pizzahut2 23:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
This might be good to know when editing the article: Wikipedia:List guideline#Purpose of lists --Pizzahut2 19:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I added the standard to-do list thing at the top. Hope that's OK --WikiSlasher 02:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ehhh
You people are getting rid of a lot of mod pages. Uber555 12:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia is very strict when it comes to notability, however deleting Sven Co-op was a bit over the top imho. --Pizzahut2 13:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What the!?!?
Your deleting some of the greatest single player mods for some unknown reason. POV and Azure sheep are excellent finished hl1 mods so why delete them? 88.104.45.235 18:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- The reason for a deletion is given in the deletion log, see the links above.
- Azure Sheep: The deletion is the result of a discussion amongst Wikipedia editors, which can be viewed here.
- Point of View was deleted because no one contested a proposed deletion. The reason for the proposal was "Fails WP:V, WP:RS, WP:OR."
- --Pizzahut2 19:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Those were the reason to be deleted the page. Cant they just be listed? (without a page) --Snewerl 10:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Maybe, but wouldn't it be best to start adding mods everyone agrees with? That's the ones in the Category:Half-Life mods. --Pizzahut2 13:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Shouldnt the mods be added because of notability instead of agreing with? In Azure Sheep case, it was reviewed by the above sites and it was reviewed by a magazine also. Shouldnt that make for notability? Snewerl 20:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- They got removed from the list because someone thought they aren't notable enough. So instead of adding / removing / argueing, why not add the mods where everyone agrees they are notable first, and *then* add other mods or argue. --Pizzahut2 01:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Whatever. I gave up on trying to add/fix stuff in Wikipedia. It is wasted time. You try to do something and it is deleted just because some admin decides it. Waste of time. Snewerl 08:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
[edit] Gunman Chronicles?
Gunman Chronicles is listed in Category:Half-Life mods, however I don't think it was ever released as a mod, so not sure if it should be in the list of Half-Life mods. --Pizzahut2 13:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I would say it fits the wikipedia definition of a mod for all but made by the public, which I would contest with. Unless you can find another suitable name to give it (I'm sure there's one rattling about in the back of my head but I can't think of it) I would suggest it stays. --AJanuary 10:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Single player mod descriptions
I've added mods from the category and from the main article, anyone willing to add some descriptions? --Pizzahut2 13:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)