Talk:Light machine gun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

I think we have to differentiate between LMG's and general-purpose machine guns, any one have plausible distinction criteria? Oberiko 13:15, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I think the classification of all MG's blurs at the edges. Certainly an LMG and its ammo can be identified - carried without great strain by a single soldier, tends to be issued one to a squad, , needs only a bipod, and is used for extra weight of firepower in short bursts and may also be referred to as a Light infantry support weapon.
The GPMG seems to be capable of and is normally used for extra firepower in bigger amounts hence belt fed rather than a magazine. Portable but heavy, with the extra ammo needed spread across the gunner and another soldier. Issued at 1 per platoon, so more less common than the LMG.
Heavy machine guns tend to be big, probably carried on a vehicle or semi-permanently mounted needing two or more soldiers and a vehicle to move around eg the Maxim heritage (Vickers) and 50 cals. GraemeLeggett 16:13, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)