User talk:License2Kill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I blocked you because I warned you both several times about making unproductive edits. You made no effort to resolve the dispute on the talk page for the discography or in the numerous other revert wars you have gotten yourself engaged in. The one edit you made to the discography talk page merely stated that "[a]n admin agreed with the inclusion months ago", with no further specifics. Your continued hostile behavior to other editors, your perceived ownership of articles, and your edit warring are the reasons why I blocked you. Enjoy your day off. -Mysekurity 03:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Archives
1 2

Contents 1 Tupac's birth name 2 RFC/discussion of article Tupac Shakur 3 why 4 3RR on The Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory 5 ok 6 look 6.1 March 2007 7 Your edit to All Eyez on Me

[edit] Tupac's birth name

Please stop changing his birth name. His official website (click on the 2Pac) says that Tupac is his birth name, and unless you provide a more verifiable source, I'm going to revert it. Besides, other websites that state his birth name is the unnofficial one state that it's Lesane Parish, not Parish Lesane. -Mysekurity 04:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it has been discussed, but I believe there was no consensus. The 7 internet sources Jowan2005 cited are not nearly notable enough to be a verifiable source. Tupac's own official website says nothing about his "Crooks" identity, and the research I have done into the non-verifiabe websites is that the information seems to be based on a rumor about Afeni changing the name immediately following birth, but this appears to be false too. If this continues, I'm going to ask for a request for comment. -Mysekurity 22:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

It's not an official book. It wasn't released by his family. And the story's still open. On the Amazon page, it says "with the cooperation of Tupac's family"—Not "released by Tupac's family as an official biography". Let's cut this rumor off here and now. -Mysekurity 02:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. -Mysekurity 05:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFC/discussion of article Tupac Shakur

Hello, License2Kill. As a prominent contributor to Tupac Shakur, you may want to be aware that a request for comments has been filed about it. The RFC can be found by the article's name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:Tupac Shakur, in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions. -- Mysekurity 06:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you think of the compromise to include LPC as an alias? -Mysekurity 01:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] why

why was my song list removed and why was my disses removed there all real y the fuck is the problem its all factuall

[edit] 3RR on The Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on The Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. You and MJukmix need to discuss it on the talk page. I'm not going to warn you again. -Mysekurity 07:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

He is the one that is reverting a cited fact. License2Kill 02:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but it is still in violation of the 3RR. Would you like me to protect the page until you both can work it out on the talk page? -Mysekurity 02:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll tell you what I told him: If either of you revert one more time, I will block you. Please use the talk page to discuss this issue. If it isn't solved by March 18 (UTC), I will protect the page. -Mysekurity 02:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

He's still reverting a cited fact just because he doesn't believe it. That would be like me removing the sentence that states Eminem has sold 70 million albums. It is sited so there is no reason to remove it License2Kill 02:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but he seems to have reason to believe the cite is incorrect. Regardless, you both need to work it out on the talk page. Please stop logging out and using your ip address to re-add the content. It's still considered a violation of the 3RR, and as a result, I am blocking that ip from editing for the next 48 hours. -Mysekurity 03:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by engaging in an edit war without discussing it adequately.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. -Mysekurity 02:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ok

ok ok but that is the bulk of them i got most of the list off other websites and plus i have heard all of them so far...... that list was not finished yet but thats nearly two thirds of them .. i dont no why u had to delete it u can at least help me with it would that not be better cause there is alot of people out there who wants to no what songs ar left that u can get ur hands on.... and you toke off the stuff on Disses i added evenn do there all correct and if you dont belive me listen to the songs ......... P.S i joined Wikipedia just to help out with the 2pac site dont ruin it on me please —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TrueDaz (talk • contribs) 07:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] look

look mate get tat into ur head that is the bulk of them, i think people want to now wats still unreleased , not wats left but wats unreleased . alrite so just help me with it

[edit] March 2007

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Tupac Shakur. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. —Ocatecir ^Talk 00:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I feel I have to continually tell you this. If you don't stop your belligerent behavior, I will block you again. -Mysekurity 21:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I would like to talk with you over e-mail or IRC. Your e-mail isn't set up with Wikipedia, but please feel free to e-mail me (my username @ gmail). Thank you. -Mysekurity 21:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

If you have Gmail or Google Talk, I am available via that, or I'm also (rarely) on AIM as mysekurity. -Mysekurity 03:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Can we please discuss this over e-mail first? I will be quite busy lately, and have little time for AIM... -Mysekurity 04:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Nice talking to you. -Mysekurity 04:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Now that isn't nice. If you have a problem with me, let me know. I've been more than willing to look at the book, save for the fact that Borders is closed when I am available to go. You have my word I'll check it out next week, when I'll be available. Don't work too hard, and try to get some sleep. -Mysekurity 04:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

But I haven't excluded any facts. I've put them in with the book as a citation, in addition to the alternative viewpoint in accordance with Wikipedia's neutrality policy. As I have said over and over, we do not have official confirmation from the family (despite what you say), and therefore this is unverifiable. I said it before, and I'll say it again. I'm quite busy this week, but you have my word I'll check out the book as soon as I can (and hell, if it looks good, I may even buy it). Happy editing, Mysekurity 04:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to All Eyez on Me

Your recent edit to All Eyez on Me (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)