Talk:Lesser of two evils principle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

FYI: The phrase, "Logicians sometimes consider the lesser of two evils principle to be an instance of the false dichotomy fallacy, and that this fallacy is particularly severe among those advocating third parties," makes no sense, either logically or grammatically (redundancy). -- Anon.

[edit] The plural of "coup d'etat"

The expression means "state coup". Therefore, "coups d'etat" sounds (at least to me) far more logical than "coup d'etats"... Jancikotuc 09:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This article is too US-centered

I doubt anyone has ever measured where the "lesser of two evils" principle is more used for anyone to claim the U.S. is particularly fond of it.

[edit] Shaky?

Is there any justification for referring to the democratically elected government of Chile as "shaky?" If so, it should be cited.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../l/e/s/Talk%7ELesser_of_two_evils_principle_7e36.html"