Talk:Leningrad Cowboys Go America

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article upgrading needed: You can help. WP:IA 

 Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions

To contribute in upgrading this stub article to start class, the following requirements must be met:

  • Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
  • Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
  • Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image; non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible
  • Plot summary
  • Cast section
  • At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, references in popular culture, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
  • Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))

 Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF

Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to start class and this template will be removed automatically.

This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Unknown
This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.

[edit] I think this needs to be restructured

Currently the article is structured like this:

  1. A brief introductory paragraph
  2. Stuff about the Leningrad Cowboys in other films
  3. "Plot"
  4. "Trivia"

I find the "Plot" section particularly problematic. This is not a normal Hollywood movie. By itself the plot tells us nothing. You have to consider plot, style, language etc. together to get an idea of what it is like and why it is widely regarded as an important movie. Having a separate "Plot" section makes this difficult and therefore I think the article needs to be restructured.

For example, off the top of my head I know of two things that don't fit easily into the article as it is. One is that it was shot in Kaurismäki's characteristic deadpan style. The other is that all the speech of the "Russian" characters, which is subtitled into English (at least on the VHS copy I got hold of in the UK), is in fact Finnish, with the exception of the genuine Russian word "da". Unfortunately I don't have ready access to newspaper reviews of the film or academic papers about it (although I am sure there must be some) or I would rewrite the article myself. FWIW I personally consider the movie to be a study of blackness in which "blackness" is defined as everything that isn't WASP, including African Americans, Mexicans, Russians and Finns. Unfortunately I don't know whether anybody has written any papers about this. Ireneshusband 04:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)