Left anarchism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Left anarchism is a term used almost exclusively by opponents of traditional anarchism to denominate philosophies that oppose capitalism (private ownership of the means of production). This term thus encompasses libertarian socialism, anarcho-communism, and anarcho-syndicalism. In the post-leftist schema the polemical element is "left anarchism's" adherence to a political plane of action. In the pro-market schema the polemical element is "left anarchism's" anti-market views.

As a polemical term, the subject of its polemic is more properly examined under Libertarian socialism, this page primarily deals with what some people believe to be "left anarchism."

Contents

[edit] Use in Post-left anarchist polemics

Post-left anarchists, who also oppose capitalism, use the term "left anarchism" to label mainstream anarchism. In the conception of post-left anarchists the phrase "left anarchy" is an insult. This can be broken down into two post-leftist trends. The first is a libertarian socialist tendency which claims that "leftism" in general is a bourgeois and liberalist phenomena, pointing to the Social Democratic movement as an example. This tendency affirms that it is for communism and the working class; but rapidly proceeds to dismantle these terms due to their political limitations. The second post-leftist tendency is a more lifestylist one, which sees "leftism" as part of a denegrated political domain. This second tendency generally favours personal and immediate activity, on the scale of lifestylism.

[edit] Use in pro-market polemics

Pro-market anarchists concentrate their polemic against anti-capitalist anarchists along traditional lines of pro-liberal and anti-socialist polemics. To this extent the controversy over pro- or anti- capitalist anarchism can be seen as part of the larger debate surrounding criticisms of socialism. Anarcho-capitalism is regarded as right anarchism in this scheme.

[edit] Responses by anti-market anarchists

The factual accuracy and usefulness of the phrase "left anarchism" is challenged by many anarchists, who consider anarchist ideas to be exclusively opposed to capitalist relations, and point out that all historical anarchist upheavals and movements have been distinctly anti-capitalist. They argue that the recent groups referring to themselves as "right anarchists" are so small and unaccepted among anarchists, that making such a distinction can serve only to amplify a false sense of importance and activity that is almost non-existent outside of academic circles. The very act of defining a "left" and "right" within the movement is thus considered by many mainstream anarchists as politically motivated: it legitimises the existence of a right wing emboding pro-market views. For that matter, many anarcho-capitalists and other pro-market libertarians reject the label of "right" for themselves, feeling that their viewpoint transcends the traditional left-right political spectrum.

The term is not used by most communist or syndicalist anarchists. One exception is Ulrike Heider, who claims to be syndicalist. In Anarchism: Left, Right and Green Heider produces three categories of anarchism: left anarchism, right anarchism (anarcho-capitalism), and green anarchism. Heider's work has been strongly criticised by some academics for the allegedly poor quality of its research and presentation. Heider has also been attacked by the left and the right for the political content of her work.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

Heider, Ulrike. Anarchism: Left, Right and Green San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1994.
In other languages