User talk:Ldxar1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Ldxar1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Strothra 01:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your RFM
Should yourself and the other involved party agree, I have decided to take the case. Could you please indicate your acceptance on the mediation page (end of page)? Thanks much! KillerChihuahua?!? 22:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, now waiting for your input here. Please watchlist this page so you are aware when new developments occur, thanks much! KillerChihuahua?!? 11:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Brevity being desirable, and your position statement being long, I wish to reduce it by either your editing or mine for clarity and focus. If you can do so, please do. If you wish me to attempt, I will of course do so with the understanding that you have final say in whther the statement is accurate or not. thanks - KillerChihuahua?!? 23:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks much - we're now waiting for Guardian sickness to weigh in. FYI, you may find this guideline helpful in how to format numbered lists so the numbering doesn't break. I have tidied the list and read the linked articles. Let me know if you have any questions, or if you think there is anything else we could start addressing on the page while waiting for GS. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Brevity being desirable, and your position statement being long, I wish to reduce it by either your editing or mine for clarity and focus. If you can do so, please do. If you wish me to attempt, I will of course do so with the understanding that you have final say in whther the statement is accurate or not. thanks - KillerChihuahua?!? 23:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moved post
This still doesn't explain why CARF's account of the origins of Asian gangs in Glasgow is not relevant when Bashir Maan's comments on policing of Asian gangs ostensibly is.
Source 1 which is a mainstream source clearly shows that the view that the view of (wrongly) suspected gang membership is still debated in the mainstream.
Further, such grounds is compatible with racial *aggravation*. I haven't denied that the case is racially *aggravated* in the sense meant in British law; I'd problematise the inference from this to "racially motivated" or "primarily racist".
cf: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/26012007/325/teens-guilty-racist-murder-taxi-driver.html in which the police state that racial *aggravation* occurred because racist language was used during the murder, but that the main *motive* was gang retribution based on wrongful identification.
-Ldxar1 04:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ldxar1, please stop commenting on everything GS posts. I have moved your most recent commentary here. I know it is hard not to comment, but you two have tried working together directly and been unable to resolve the problem, so please give the mediation a chance and try not to treat the mediation page like the article talk page - a change of scenery won't help if the argument goes the same, ok? KillerChihuahua?!? 09:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
