User talk:LBM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my page
My pages
Home  • My talk page  • My contributions  • My numerous userboxes

My smiles


Archive
Archives
  1. January – March 2006
  2. April – June 2006


[edit] That's So Raven

Great job on the "That's So Raven" logo! I tried to find one online, but there weren't any. It must have taken a long time to completely recreate the logo. Keep up the good work! =D Jumping cheese Contact 22:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanxs for the first smile I ever got! Here's a smile for you. ^_^ Jumping cheese Contact 00:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied to on user page
Smile moved to top of page

[edit] That's So Raven

How could I have damaged the hard work of others? All I did was put a better image. Nationalboard 15:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] All That Template

You wanted an All That temlate, I made an All That template!!! Quasyboy 9:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Replied to on user page
No Problem ;) Quasyboy 9:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandals

user with IP address 24.198.209.111 has added silly and offensive text as well as tried to add a link to themselves that resulted in the 'Ancestry' portion of the Judy Garland article being removed - I have reverted this vandalism but am not sure how to "WARN" this person to stop doing such silly things - I and others including yourself have put tremendous effort into that article and although it has been removed from the GA list it is an excellent article that provides the most comprehensive overview of the subject and has the potential to be an exemplar of what a "Celbrity" bio should have i.e. it should show exactly why the subject is famous. Can you send a warning to this user? Vono 19:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Replied to on user page

[edit] Catherine hayes / Hayes

I created an article about the famous Irish opera Singer Catherine Hayes however initially I mispelled the surname on the article as 'hayes' using a lower case "H". The article titled 'Catherine hayes' with the lower case H should be deleted but I can't figure out how to do it. Can you help? sorryVono 15:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Replied to on user page


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:VH - 1.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VH - 1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 00:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] where to find the lions

Hi LBM, you've done an amazing job on the MGM lions article, its been invaluable for me to find the lions for an art piece i'm making.
As requested i've uploaded screeshots here: [Leo the lion discussion]

The images are all my screenshots from DVDs

thanks, --Superfine 22:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Replied to on user page

[edit] Judy Garland Article

Hi LBM - 2 more sectoions have been added to the Garland article - Myths and Rumours - I beleive that these 2 sections are unseless and can jeopardise teh article's value or re classification as a Good article - which I think it is - Myths and Rumours should not be allowed in my opinion unless teh source of the myth and/or rumour is cited in a refeerence - the Rumour listed particularly irritates me as I have done a trmendous amount of research on garland and have read every biography and literally thousands of articles and never came across any 'rumour' that Garland used 'Street Drugs' is there any way that Wikipedia can make the decision whether or not this rumour stays? I do not want to delete it and begin some type of editing war that can damage the integrity of teh article that is one of teh best of its type- providing for teh most part comprehensive factual data however if Wikipedia can rule it useless or irrlevant that would solve the issue. Aren't articles supposed to only contain 'factual' verifiable info? RegardsVono 07:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Replied to on user page
Well Myths has been put back into the article - I guess at least the "Rumours" section has remained deleted - the next thing we will see is a "Trivia" section that will further undermine the quality of the article and allow every looney to add silly and useless statements as is seen in the Liza Minnelli article I do not understand why that anecdote that Garland did tell on the Jack Parr show requires a seperate heading of "Myths" it could have been worked into another section - perhaps under Movie star as something like this "In later years Garland would often tell humourous stories about the filming of the Wizard of Oz, such as the 3 main characters crowding her out during dance sequences on the yellowbrick road that required the Director to intervene." Or somethign like that which can be referenced from any of the biographies written about- regards vono 86.12.250.117 07:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Slats and goldwyn logo

LBM do you have any idea where i could find a film with either Slats or the original Goldwyn logo on them. I'm using video clips to form an artwork and am trying to get every mgm lion

thankyou --Superfine 15:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Replied to on user page

[edit] Why did you get rid of sonny?

He has been confirmed as coming on December 22nd,http://uk.news.yahoo.com/02122006/344/new-love-interest-corrie-girl.html and has been reported in the subsequent spoilers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.12.245.107 (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC).

Replied to on user page


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:That's So Raven - test 2.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:That's So Raven - test 2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Di talk 13:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Coronation Street

I didn't notice that someone had added the 'Senior Cast Members' bit to the infobox. Thanks for removing it! Ben 18:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Replied to on user page

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:That's So Raven logo1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:That's So Raven logo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:M Queens 2001 - v1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M Queens 2001 - v1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 03:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mahotella Queens 2006.jpg has been tagged for the same reason. ShadowHalo 03:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Coronation Street - Featured Article Candidate

I thought I'd let you know that I have put Coronation Street forward as a FAC, hopefully it will be promoted back to FA status. Why not pop along to the FAC page and have a look? Ben 14:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)