Talk:Latham & Watkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is disputable about the existing page? It is completely accurate.

  • Accuracy is one thing; the article must conform to Wikipedia style and standards also. It does not. It is not properly formatted to WikiStyle. It has information that does not need to be there. You can have links, but you don't need to go on about third party information in that article, it should be done in the appropriate article.

Also, don't remove notices, it is not up to you to remove a notice placed by another WikiUser against text that you have entered.

WikiDon 05:01, 8 September 2005 (UTC)


How about a source for that "largest" claim? Frankly, it reads like an ad. Al 14:03, September 8, 2005 (UTC)


  • I agree. This entry reads like an ad, by using terms such as "largest", "most respected law firms in the world", "a major business-law firm" and "author of the most widely recognized treatise Uniform Commercial Code" without citing sources.

In fact, it makes me even suspect as to if a lawyer wrote this entry... =P Tmblweed 20:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


  • Should remove AveryIndex cite, as it's just a derivative of the Law.com rankings.