Talk:Lars Ohly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	The article on Lars Ohly is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Why is this removed:

When he did the test at http://www.politicalcompass.org/, he scored:

Economic Left/Right: -9.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.00

--

That is premiere information about his views and opitions - imagine if every politican took that test! I say it should be put back! Does anyone have anything against that?

Where did this information come from? I'd say it needs a reference. — Nowhither 05:25, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Ohly is not a revolutionist ..."

I have deleted the last sentence of this article, the original version of which was added by 80.217.161.77 in the 13:05, 28 April 2005 edit. The sentence, in its most recent form, read as follows:

However, Ohly is not a revolutionist, and his idea on communist is more of classical social democratic transformation of society.

I deleted it because it reads like an opinion of the writer, rather than a NPOV factual statement. It also does not seem to fit well with the text preceding it (or if it does, I don't see how). And, of course, it needs some rewording, although I could have fixed that part.

Adding this information back into the article is fine with me, as long as it can be presented in a NPOV manner and in a way that fits with the rest of the controversy subsection. — Nowhither 05:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)