Talk:Larry Pinkney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
It is worth noting that significant statements based on public records have been edited out of this entry, leading one to believe that the principal author of this article is either Larry Pinkney, or someone operating directly on his behalf. It is unfortunate that a public, democratic media source cannot meet the expectations of rigorous scrutiny and therefore be considered a valid and objective source of information. This is perhaps one reason why information obtained from Wikipedia is not considered a viable source for print news and other media publications.
Contrary to the above assertion, Wikipedia is very much considered by many to be a, not the only, "valid and objective source of information..." The above statement assigning responsibility to "Larry Pinkney, or someone operating directly on his behalf..." is itself based upon innuendo and subjectivity, and reeks of racism. In the real world an enormous amount of people have access to the internet through various means.
The information referred to and contained on the following links, neglects to mention that the trial by judge of black activist Larry Pinkney in Minneapolis, MN, in 1995, selectively excluded black people, having a white prosecuting attorney, a white supposed defense attorney, and a white judge; assuring that Larry Pinkney would not receive a fair hearing.
It is also noteworthy that nothing whatever is mentioned about the fact that witnesses and evidence critical to the defense of Larry Pinkney, were disallowed by the all white Minnesota court. Additionally, it is worth being cognizant that no mention is made in the following links, to the belated retractions by the news media of its crucial and damaging false information about Larry Pinkney. These kinds of oversights appear to be the tactics being utilized by the person or persons making the obviously disingenuous neutrality argument.
Also, it should be noted that it was in fact activist Larry Pinkney, who of his own volition, in an effort to stop or at least slow down the discreditation actovities against him; made it a matter of legal record that he would not be on Minnesota college campuses. Activist Larry Pinkney could have refused to agree to the staying away from Minnesota college campuses stipulation, but did so in an effort to expose the efforts to maliciously discredit him; which is also not delineated in the following links.
Larry James Pinkney, b. 4/27/1950, was convicted on two counts of sexual assault in 1995, in Minneapolis, MN. He is currently on probation until 2009. He is not allowed within 1500 feet of any college campus. There have been other reports of incidents of rape and sexual assault, but due to lack of evidence (no witnesses), no other charges have been made. Here are some links to fact-check this:
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS CX-95-1869 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Larry James Pinkney, Appellant. Filed June 18, 1996
http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/ctapun/9606/cx951869.htm
Reported Incidents at Macalester College, St. Paul, MN, October 2005
http://wcco.com/topstories/local_story_289143421.html
I am personally acqainted with one of his assault victims.
141.140.120.31 03:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding the POV Check tag:
I agree with the editor at the top of this page.
After posting the above information, I studied the changes made to the article and find it likely that despite the verifiability of the information that was removed as "libelous," the article itself is being edited by someone promoting Larry Pinkney, rather than someone dedicated to providing full and accurate information about him.
Furthermore, many of the statements made regarding the convictions are not exactly neutral, nor are they verifiable.
Thank you,
DevinMcGevin 04:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
It should be noted that Wikipedia's "Devin McGevin" is apparently Devin FOSTER, who is a student at none other than Macalester College, Minnesota; and is not in any way "neutral" in this matter. Also, Ms. Devin Foster is a native of Bellingham, Washington, which is well known as one of the most white racist domains in the state of Washington, where she has enjoyed enormous white economic and social privilege.
With respect to black activist Larry Pinkney, long standing and continuing FBI COINTELPRO discreditation activities, the collusion of the media in spreading false published stories against Larry Pinkney, and the connection to a Wikipedia "editor" (who is also apparently a Macalester College student in Minnesota) and a native of Bellingham, Washington; research has determined the following relevant information with respect to efforts to discredit black activist Larry Pinkney using false sex allegations in Bellingham, Washington:
It has been ascertained that not coincidentally, and as a result
strenuous legal and political follow-up, The Bellingham Herald news-
paper (of Bellingham, Washington) was compelled to come clean and
and publish, in relevant part, concerning its own previously
published stories that, "Larry Pinkney, was arrested Thursday,
on an FBI warrant charging him with unlawful flight to avoid prosecu-
tion, NOT on a charge of a sexual offense as previously reported...
The FBI INCORRECTLY informed the Whatcom County Sherriff's Office re-
garding the sexual offense."
Of course, as intended by the media in Bellingham, Washington and the FBI, the damage against black activist Larry Pinkney had already been done.
The Wikipedia "editor" (and apparent Macalester College, Minnesota student) from Bellingham, Washington, who has been piously calling for "neutrality" and "full disclosure" has failed to heed her own advice, by not forthrightly and openly disclosing in this Wikipedia "discussion" that she is herself apparently a Macalester student, that her last name is not "McGevin," and that she is a native of Bellingham, Washington, whose media and white community actively sought to use false information to discredit internationally known black activist Larry Pinkney. None of this is coincidental.
Furthermore, any allegations and/or convictions against black political activists in the United States have repeatedly been shown to be attempts to discredit said activists. Particularly is this clear in the case of black political activist Larry Pinkney, whose American FBI file is quite clear as to some of the tactics used to frame and discredit him using "sex and drug" allegations. What is also clear is that this has nothing whatever to do with so-called "neutrality," but rather is an ongoing discreditation vendetta by certain individuals, possibly working in collusion with the FBI or some similar agency or organization in an effort to misinform the public as to Larry Pinkney's political background and accomplishments.
Not only is the article in Wikipedia "neutral," its contents are in fact verified by, among other things, United Nation's records and American FBI files; apparently being ignored by those claiming that they are allegedly interested in "neutrality." The very term "neutrality" in this context is nothing more than a smoke screen for an ongoing and racist vendetta against Larry Pinkney. As usual, in a de facto racist society such as the United States of America, every possible effort will be made to discredit, libel, misinform, and (as the FBI files themselves indicate) "neutralize" black political activists such as Larry Pinkney. Read those FBI files, and stop pretending that"neutrality" is being sought after.
Larry Pinkney has also been accused of being a political "terrorist," which like the "sex and drug" allegations are false and contrived with the intent of discrediting and "neutralizing" him. Court records are deliberately misleading, especially since they OMIT the FBI files and concomitant records re the past and ongoing attempts to use false "sex and drug" allegations to discredit Larry Pinkney.
Larry Pinkney is not a rapist, a drug dealer, or a terrorist; nor are these the issues. Rather, he is a black politcal activist whom certain individuals (including apparently a Wikipedia editor)are attempting to discredit. "Accurate" information about Larry Pinkney is obviously what said individuals seek to avoid, which is why he has been libeled in Wikipedia in the past, and efforts continue to, at all costs, ignore (among other things) the details of the COINTELPRO records of the American FBI itself, regarding Larry Pinkney.
Whether the convictions were false or not, they still happened and are on record, and this should be included in the interest of full disclosure. Shall we request arbitration?
DevinMcGevin 20:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The fact that "the convictions" of Larry Pinkney were "false" are extremely relevant.
The interests of "full disclosure" are not what this is about. Instead, it is the continued white racist predilection with sex which makes COINTELPRO-type "sex and drug" discreditation sting operations against black political activists as Larry Pinkney, so hideous and insidiously effective in the United States of Amerikkka. It is self-evident that "full disclosure" is being used as a veneer for discreditation against Larry Pinkney, and by design, other black political activists. Whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the politics of Larry Pinkney, his political actions have benefited many thousands of people around the world, while having simultaneously incurred the wrath of powerful components of the American Government, and that of many individual open and closet racists in this country who remain adamant in their efforts to discredit him.
The fact that "sex and drug" allegations against black activist Larry Pinkney are already directly and specifically referred to in the existing Wikipedia article is quite sufficient. There is no need for arbitration in this matter, which appears to look increasingly like a racist and extremely biased witch hunt.
This alleged "discussion" has nothing whatever to do with Wikipedia neutrality or even arbitration. Rather, it has everything to do with active discreditation tactics and grudges against black activists, as those who have studied COINTELPRO well know.
