Talk:Laos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ญ | This article is about a person, place, or concept whose name is originally rendered in the Thai script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Thai script. For more information, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Thai). |
http://www.mekong-protected-areas.org/lao_pdr/n_report.htm says 21% of land area is NBCA
Lao should not redirect to Laos because Lao is also an ethnic group (to the tune of 30 million people) that resides in Thailand.
When is this page going to be wikied into the wiki country style???
let's make this like other wiki country pages
I have just created the List of Laos-related topics. Please add all pages I forgot or did not find, or those which you start into that list. andy 11:58 Apr 8, 2003 (UTC)
Lao unicode doesn't work. Let's just use Thai. Lao people have no problem reading it.
- What is the problem with Lao unicode? I can see the characters working - however what seems to be broken is the posing of the vocals above and below and in front the characters, something which works fine with Thai. But this is not a problem of unicode nor a problem of Wikipedia, it's just that the OS does not know about it. A western Win2000 handles Thai fine, but not Lao. Probably older Windows will have problem with handling Thai as well pr might not even include a font to render it, and maybe future OS will handle Lao correctly - I don't about other OS like MacOS or Linux how much these are prepared for non-latin languages. Some totally nonsense Lao: ຍີຽໃຜັ andy 09:05 Apr 14, 2003 (UTC)
Interesting. I can't read it. Only see empty boxes. I'm running 2000
- Then it's a font issue - I have one nearly complete unicode font (24MB) containing the japanese, chinese and koreanish characters as well, seems like that one adds the Laotian characters, too. Sadly, this font is no longer available from the Microsoft website, it was a free add-on to Office. However, at http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/fonts.html it has an alternative which only contain the Lao characters - and with that font even the placement is correct. andy 07:46 Apr 15, 2003 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Lao (ethnic group)
This isn't strictly about the Laos page, but I don't think there's a better place to mention it. I have a draft article on the Lao ethnic group at User:Markalexander100/Lao: is there any objection to putting it on Lao, which currently redirects here? The alternative (as far as I can see) is to put it on Lao (ethnic group) and have Lao as a disambig page. Markalexander100 09:27, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Why does the article say that Laos only has electricity in a few urban areas? From my experience I thought that Laos has elecricity in all urban areas and in fact has electricity in all of the villages that I saw. Admittedly I haven't seen very many villages, but in any event I think that the phrase "Electricity is available only in a few urban areas" is misleading.
[edit] citation request
A citation request was made for:
"Laos was ordered in the late 1970s by Vietnam to end relations with China which cut the country off from trade with any country but Vietnam [citation needed]."
I dont see this as needing a citation. There is nothing obscure about:
- Laos cutting off relations with China after Vietnam and China fell out with each other. - The fact that this decision effectively isolated Laos economically. Thailand was already closed. Insurgencies made Burma impossible and Cambodia was ruled by Vietnam. That only left China and the break in relations cut that off.
- A citation request is nothing to do with obscurity, it has to do with verifiability. I suspect the questioner's concern is with the 'ordered' rather than with the actual effects. HenryFlower 09:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
You obviously won't be able to find a citation for Vietnam "ordering" Laos to do anything. As I discuss at my two History of Laos articles, the Lao communists don't need to be "ordered" to do things by the Vietnamese communists, to whom they have always been willing subordinates. Laos always follows Vietnam's lead in foreign policy, both because Laos is still largely dependent on Vietnam (and was even more so in 1979) and because the Lao leaders believe the Vietnamese leadership is always right. Adam 10:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- I refuse to entertain the fiction that the Laos government in the late 1970's was an independent government making its own decisions. There was no independent Laos government until the Vietnamese army and the Vietnamese political advisors left the country. There were no Laos reasons for cutting relations with China. The country that had the problem at that time with China was Vietnam. The point of the original text was that the action was done for Vietnamese reasons, that it was harmful to Laos and it left Laos even more dependent on Vietnam as a side-effect. If the word "ordered" is a problem, I'm willing to consider alternatives that preserve the the original point.
Please stop posting anonymous comments. Adam 01:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Image...Si Saket vs. That Luang
Gentleman two simple google image searches for "That Luang" and "Wat Sisaket" reveal that this is indeed a picture of Wat Sisaket. From what I can see, the temple in the article's image looks nothing like any structure in the That Luang compound. The image uploader and Mr. Fowler are correct so Mr. annonymous IP, please stop changing the caption.--WilliamThweatt 19:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not Sisaket
The image whose caption was changed is, with all due respect, not Wat Sisaket. It is a view of the Wat Luang Nua (or Neua) located on the north side of the That Luang complex. There is also a Wat Luang Tai temple building to the south. The photograph in question appears to have been taken by someone who had entered through the main That Luang entrance and then turned 90 degrees to their left. In the photograph one can see the inner couryard area of That Luang as well as (in the bottom right corner) the sloping edge of the That Luang stupa itself. As an imperfect reference see the following image which appears to have been taken from a location about a 100 meters behind, and a little to the right of, the location of the photo in question (http://www.orientalarchitecture.com/vientiane/THATLUANG02.htm). One can clearly see the That Luang stupa as well as the top of Wat Luang Nua on the left of the frame.
Wat Sisaket, on the other hand, is located a couple of kilometers away from That Luang (at the intersection of Lane Xang Blvd and Sethatirat Rd). Wat Sisaket has an aged brown and yellow appearance, unlike the pink and gold building seen in the photograph. A simple Google image search will provide multiple examples (although some images of neighboring Hor Phra Kheo also appear to come up).
Another difference, the inner coutyard of Wat Sisaket is covered in brick or tile (see "http://www.orientalarchitecture.com/vientiane/WATSISAKET08.htm"), while the inner courtyard of That Luang (as seen in the disputed photograph) is covered with grass.
I live in Laos and visited both of these sights just a couple of weeks ago, so my memory is pretty fresh.
- I've only seen one of them, so I express no opinion either way. However, it seems to me that this argument is irrelevant: the picture is included as an example of a wat, so which one it is is neither here nor there. HenryFlower 18:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- A good solution for now, but in the interest of thoroughness, I think it should only be considered a temporary solution until we can get this figured out. Maybe we should scrap the pic and find one of a temple we can all agree on.
[edit] My PD Laos photos
Sabaidee, folks: here are some new photos for you. Perhaps you should use one of Wat That Luang, since it's the national shrine. Adam 03:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
That Luang is too atypical to be a good example of Lao religious architecture in general; I'd go for something more conventional, but without a bloody great tree in the way - perhaps Image:Luang_Prabang_Xieng_Tong.jpg. 08:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
It's my attempt to be artistic. I will find you one without the tree. Adam 09:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
I also have photos of Wat Xieng Thong in LP, IMHO the most beautiful wat in Lao, if you are interested. Adam 10:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
The new pic looks perfect- do you remember which one it is? HenryFlower 10:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Do you mean, is it Wat Sisaket or Ho Phra Kaeo? It's Ho Phra Kaeo - you can tell them apart because Ho Phra Kaeo has those curved black nagas at the entrance. Adam 11:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Excellent pictures. Although not typical of Lao temple architecture, an image of That Luang might be a good idea to place somewhere in the article. It is very much the national symbol. The temples themselves vary quite a bit. I think that Hor Phra Keao is the most beautiful building in Vientiane, while Wat Sisaket has the claim to being the oldest continually standing structure. I'll agree with Adam though and say that Wat Xieng Thong in Luang Prabang is absolutely the most stunning piece of architecture in the country.
- I took an executive decision and inserted Ho Phra Kaeo, since it's a better picture than the Xieng Thong one, and a rather more typical building. HenryFlower 20:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Coat of Arms
Someone seems to have added the older picture of the code of arms, I have no idea why did they do this but please change it back.
And to the person that mentioned that the Thai font should be use instead of the Lao font, please try not to create hostilites or you would likely see massive complaints and comments from Laotians that view this page. The comment that you made was a big insult and offensive to the Laotian people.
[edit] Formatting
Can anybody fix the huge white space problem at the beginning of the history section? The country-info-box extending into the section causes the text to begin at the bottom of the info box, leaving about a half-page of white space between the "History" header and the beginning of the text. It's very unsightly. The 2nd section ("Naming") appears correctly, starting right after the intro and entirely to the right of the info box. I took a cursory look but couldn't figure out why the "history" section doesn't do the same.--WilliamThweatt 16:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think I figured it out. The image at the top of the History section was forcing the text to begin after the image. I moved the image syntax to after the third paragraph of the history section which allowed the text to begin immediately after the header. Not sure how it will affect other brosers but it looks a lot better in mine.--WilliamThweatt 16:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Userboxes
I have created a Userbox for Wikipedians living in Vientiane. Add this template to your userpage:
{{User Vientiane}}
The Userbox will automatically add your name to Category:Wikipedians in Vientiane and create a box that looks like the one below.
This user lives in Vientiane |
Who wants to make a userbox for Laos? Most other countries in Asia have one. See Category:Nation of origin user templates and Wikipedia:Userboxes/Location/Asia. Cheers. APB-CMX 05:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed WikiProject
In my ongoing efforts to try to include every country on the planet included in the scope of a WikiProject, I have proposed a new project on Southeastern Asia at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Southeastern Asia whose scope would include Laos. Any interested parties are more than welcome to add their names there, so we can see if there is enough interest to start such a project. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Youtube Video Links
I've removed the paragraph and the links to the YouTube Videos, under the Politics paragraph. The paragraph didn't fit in, and the links were not appropriate for the section anyway. Devtrash 01:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: B-Class Southeast Asia articles | Unknown-importance Southeast Asia articles | Articles needing Thai script | Wikipedia CD Selection | Wikipedia Version 0.5 | Wikipedia CD Selection-0.5 | Wikipedia Release Version | B-Class Version 0.5 articles | Geography Version 0.5 articles | B-Class Version 0.7 articles | Geography Version 0.7 articles