Talk:Lake Margaret Power Station, Tasmania
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, here we have a NPOV issue - the story as found read like, either the ABC report on the issue of about 2 months ago, or possibly from a Hydro insider. Also avoiding mentioning the mayor of the west coast council might be good legal sense - it sure makes it seem to be a 'local issue' and not the wider one of heritage. There are people in other parts of Tasmania,' and on the mainland who know of the place and or area who think it's criminal that the hydro should have the right to close it down.
OK so Mt Lyell locked people out of the place -consequently limiting the number of people who might see it or experience it for all of its time in charge, and now there's a potential tourist heritage site the hydro want to can it?
Put it this way the Hydro get's its newer constructions further down the range on to the national heritage register, nothing less, and it wants to scrap a potential tourism/heritage button in its cap - if it had the imagination. But then it did dam pedder. vcxlor 08:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think I understand your point, but then I don't know anything about the subject outside of what's in this article, either. --Scott Davis Talk 05:24, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- This article is about Lake Margaret and not the hydro, they are the villains of the piece!~ Its not a pr article for them! (unsigned)